Literature DB >> 34803516

Covariate adaptive familywise error rate control for genome-wide association studies.

Huijuan Zhou1, Xianyang Zhang2, Jun Chen3.   

Abstract

The familywise error rate has been widely used in genome-wide association studies. With the increasing availability of functional genomics data, it is possible to increase detection power by leveraging these genomic functional annotations. Previous efforts to accommodate covariates in multiple testing focused on false discovery rate control, while covariate-adaptive procedures controlling the familywise error rate remain underdeveloped. Here, we propose a novel covariate-adaptive procedure to control the familywise error rate that incorporates external covariates which are potentially informative of either the statistical power or the prior null probability. An efficient algorithm is developed to implement the proposed method. We prove its asymptotic validity and obtain the rate of convergence through a perturbation-type argument. Our numerical studies show that the new procedure is more powerful than competing methods and maintains robustness across different settings. We apply the proposed approach to the UK Biobank data and analyse 27 traits with 9 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms tested for associations. Seventy-five genomic annotations are used as covariates. Our approach detects more genome-wide significant loci than other methods in 21 out of the 27 traits.
© 2020 Biometrika Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EM algorithm; External covariate; Familywise error rate; Multiple testing

Year:  2020        PMID: 34803516      PMCID: PMC8598971          DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asaa098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrika        ISSN: 0006-3444            Impact factor:   2.445


  17 in total

1.  Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments.

Authors:  Richard Bourgon; Robert Gentleman; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  False Discovery Control in Large-Scale Spatial Multiple Testing.

Authors:  Wenguang Sun; Brian J Reich; T Tony Cai; Michele Guindani; Armin Schwartzman
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.488

3.  Mixed-model association for biobank-scale datasets.

Authors:  Po-Ru Loh; Gleb Kichaev; Steven Gazal; Armin P Schoech; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Covariate-modulated local false discovery rate for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Rong W Zablocki; Andrew J Schork; Richard A Levine; Ole A Andreassen; Anders M Dale; Wesley K Thompson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  False discovery rate regression: an application to neural synchrony detection in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  James G Scott; Ryan C Kelly; Matthew A Smith; Pengcheng Zhou; Robert E Kass
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Genome-Wide Significance Levels and Weighted Hypothesis Testing.

Authors:  Kathryn Roeder; Larry Wasserman
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.901

7.  Optimal multiple testing under a Gaussian prior on the effect sizes.

Authors:  Edgar Dobriban; Kristen Fortney; Stuart K Kim; Art B Owen
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.445

8.  Data-driven hypothesis weighting increases detection power in genome-scale multiple testing.

Authors:  Nikolaos Ignatiadis; Bernd Klaus; Judith B Zaugg; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  A direct approach to estimating false discovery rates conditional on covariates.

Authors:  Simina M Boca; Jeffrey T Leek
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Fast and covariate-adaptive method amplifies detection power in large-scale multiple hypothesis testing.

Authors:  Martin J Zhang; Fei Xia; James Zou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  LinDA: linear models for differential abundance analysis of microbiome compositional data.

Authors:  Huijuan Zhou; Kejun He; Jun Chen; Xianyang Zhang
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 17.906

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.