Literature DB >> 26855459

False discovery rate regression: an application to neural synchrony detection in primary visual cortex.

James G Scott1, Ryan C Kelly2, Matthew A Smith3, Pengcheng Zhou4, Robert E Kass4.   

Abstract

Many approaches for multiple testing begin with the assumption that all tests in a given study should be combined into a global false-discovery-rate analysis. But this may be inappropriate for many of today's large-scale screening problems, where auxiliary information about each test is often available, and where a combined analysis can lead to poorly calibrated error rates within different subsets of the experiment. To address this issue, we introduce an approach called false-discovery-rate regression that directly uses this auxiliary information to inform the outcome of each test. The method can be motivated by a two-groups model in which covariates are allowed to influence the local false discovery rate, or equivalently, the posterior probability that a given observation is a signal. This poses many subtle issues at the interface between inference and computation, and we investigate several variations of the overall approach. Simulation evidence suggests that: (1) when covariate effects are present, FDR regression improves power for a fixed false-discovery rate; and (2) when covariate effects are absent, the method is robust, in the sense that it does not lead to inflated error rates. We apply the method to neural recordings from primary visual cortex. The goal is to detect pairs of neurons that exhibit fine-time-scale interactions, in the sense that they fire together more often than expected due to chance. Our method detects roughly 50% more synchronous pairs versus a standard FDR-controlling analysis. The companion R package FDRreg implements all methods described in the paper.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26855459      PMCID: PMC4743052          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2014.990973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  21 in total

Review 1.  Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges.

Authors:  Emery N Brown; Robert E Kass; Partha P Mitra
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  A nonparametric empirical Bayes framework for large-scale multiple testing.

Authors:  Ryan Martin; Surya T Tokdar
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Stimulus dependence of neuronal correlation in primary visual cortex of the macaque.

Authors:  Adam Kohn; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Comparison of recordings from microelectrode arrays and single electrodes in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Ryan C Kelly; Matthew A Smith; Jason M Samonds; Adam Kohn; A B Bonds; J Anthony Movshon; Tai Sing Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. I. The single spike train.

Authors:  D H Perkel; G L Gerstein; G P Moore
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A framework for evaluating pairwise and multiway synchrony among stimulus-driven neurons.

Authors:  Ryan C Kelly; Robert E Kass
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 7.  General anesthesia, sleep, and coma.

Authors:  Emery N Brown; Ralph Lydic; Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Cognitive and perceptual functions of the visual thalamus.

Authors:  Yuri B Saalmann; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Neural synchrony in cortical networks: history, concept and current status.

Authors:  Peter J Uhlhaas; Gordon Pipa; Bruss Lima; Lucia Melloni; Sergio Neuenschwander; Danko Nikolić; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-30

10.  Spatial and temporal scales of neuronal correlation in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Matthew A Smith; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  12 in total

1.  Adjusted regularization of cortical covariance.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vinci; Valérie Ventura; Matthew A Smith; Robert E Kass
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  ADJUSTED REGULARIZATION IN LATENT GRAPHICAL MODELS: APPLICATION TO MULTIPLE-NEURON SPIKE COUNT DATA.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vinci; Valérie Ventura; Matthew A Smith; Robert E Kass
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Double Empirical Bayes Testing.

Authors:  Wesley Tansey; Yixin Wang; Raul Rabadan; David M Blei
Journal:  Int Stat Rev       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Covariate adaptive familywise error rate control for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Huijuan Zhou; Xianyang Zhang; Jun Chen
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  DeepLINK: Deep learning inference using knockoffs with applications to genomics.

Authors:  Zifan Zhu; Yingying Fan; Yinfei Kong; Jinchi Lv; Fengzhu Sun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  MultipleTesting.com: A tool for life science researchers for multiple hypothesis testing correction.

Authors:  Otília Menyhart; Boglárka Weltz; Balázs Győrffy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Data-driven hypothesis weighting increases detection power in genome-scale multiple testing.

Authors:  Nikolaos Ignatiadis; Bernd Klaus; Judith B Zaugg; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Using controls to limit false discovery in the era of big data.

Authors:  Matthew M Parks; Benjamin J Raphael; Charles E Lawrence
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Fast and covariate-adaptive method amplifies detection power in large-scale multiple hypothesis testing.

Authors:  Martin J Zhang; Fei Xia; James Zou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Accurate error control in high-dimensional association testing using conditional false discovery rates.

Authors:  James Liley; Chris Wallace
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 1.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.