| Literature DB >> 34802453 |
Sheng Zheng1,2,3, Jiafeng Wang4,3, Ning Ding1,2,3, Wenwen Chen1,2,3, Hongda Chen4,3, Meng Xue1,2,3, Fei Chen1,2,3, Jiaojiao Ni1,2,3, Zhuo Wang1,2,3, Zhenghua Lin1,2,3, Haiping Jiang5, Xiangrui Liu6,7,8, Liangjing Wang9,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) remains unsatisfactory owing to distant metastasis and resistance to concurrent systemic therapy. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), as essential participators in the tumor microenvironment (TME), play a vital role in tumor progression. Thus, CAFs-targeting therapy is appealing for remodeling TME and sensitizing GC to conventional systemic therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer-associated fibroblasts; Gastric cancer; Polymeric prodrug; SN38; Triptolide; Tumor microenvironment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34802453 PMCID: PMC8607732 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-01127-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Scheme 1Schematic overview of the composition and synergistic mechanisms for the co-delivery nanoparticles in the fibroblast-enriched microenvironment of gastric cancer (GC). a A scheme illustrating the preparation of PSN38@TPL-nsa nanoparticles, including self-assembling and drug loading. b Schematic illustration of PSN38@TPL-nsa for synergistic therapy against GC by inactivation cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and sensitized GC cells to SN38
Fig. 1Characterization of PSN38 and PSN38@TPL-nsa nanoparticles. a Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of PSN38 nanoparticles. b Representative TEM images of PSN38@TPL-nsa nanoparticles. c Zeta potential of PSN38 and PSN38@TPL-nsa nanoparticles. d Hydrodynamic diameters and polydispersity index (PDI) of PSN38. e Hydrodynamic diameters, PDI and drug encapsulation efficiency of PSN38@TPL-nsa. aEE (encapsulation efficiency) and DLE (drug loading efficiency) of TPL-nsa were determined via HPLC. f TPL-nsa release profiles in PBS with/without porcine liver esterase
Fig. 2Role of CAFs in GC. a, b The RNA expression of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) between GC samples and normal gastric tissues using TCGA cohort data using unpaired (a) and paired (b) Student’s T test, respectively. c, d Kaplan–Meier overall survival analysis of GC patients in relation to FAP expression levels in TCGA cohort (c) and ACRG cohort (d). e, f The mRNA expression (e) and Kaplan–Meier overall survival (f) analysis of FAP in the GC and normal tissues using Zhejiang university cohort data. g Protein expression of FAP in 12 pairs of GC and adjacent normal gastric tissues by western blot analysis. (***p < 0.001)
Fig. 3Low dose of TPL inactivated CAFs and inhibited CAFs-induced cell proliferation, migration and chemotherapy resistance of gastric cancer cells. a Representative image of bright photo, Oil Red staining and immunofluorescence staining of FAP and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) analysis of CAFs in each group. b Statistical analysis of apoptotic CAF proportion treated with TPL for 48 h. c The proliferative abilities of CAFs after treatment with 12.5 nM or 25 nM TPL determined by CCK-8 assay. d Quantitative analysis of Oil red staining for CAFs treated with different concentrations of TPL for 48 h. e Western Blot analysis of FAP, α-SMA and NF-κB/p65 in CAFs. f The mRNA expression of FAP, α-SMA and genes (TGF-β1, SMAD2,3,4,6) involved in the TGF-β pathway of CAFs treated with 12.5 nM or 25 nM TPL. *, control versus 12.5 nM TPL treatment; #, control versus 25 nM TPL treatment. g The diagram of MKN45 and BGC-823 cells incubated with conditioned medium (CM) derived from CAFs or TPL-treated CAFs. h Proliferation of MKN45 and BGC-823 cells incubated with CM derived from CAFs or TPL-treated CAFs was assessed by CCK-8 assay. i, j Migration of MKN45 and BGC-823 cells incubated with CM derived from CAFs or TPL-treated CAFs. Representative images were shown (i) and migrated cells were counted (j) via Photoshop CC2019 software. k In vitro antitumor efficiency of SN38 against MKN45 and BGC-823 cells, with simultaneous 48 h incubations of CM derived from CAFs or TPL-treated CAFs. All data were presented as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used to analyze the statistical difference. (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 4TPL sensitized GC cells to SN38 and reversed the SN38 resistance induced by co-culture with CAFs. a Cell viability of MKN45, BGC-823 and CAFs after treated with different concentrations of SN38 combined with/without 12.5 nM TPL for 48 h. b Combination index (CI) analysis of TPL and SN38 combinational therapy in MKN45, BGC-823 and CAFs. c, d Cell cycle distributions of MKN45 and BGC-823 cells after treated with TPL, SN38 or a combination of TPL and SN38 for 24 h. e Western Blot assay of cyclin D1 and cyclin B1 of MKN45 and BGC-823 with different treatments. f Illustration of mono-culture and co-culture models. In the mono-culture model, GC cells were cultured individually. Transwell chambers were utilized in the co-culture model: CAFs were cultured in the upper chamber; whereas, GC cells were cultured in the lower chamber. g, h Apoptotic analysis of BGC-823 and MKN45 cells after the treatment of TPL, SN38 or a combination of SN38 and TPL for 24 h in the co-culture and mono-culture model, respectively. i Western Blot analysis of PARP, cleaved PARP and NF-κB/p65 in the BGC-823 and MKN45 cells which were treated with TPL, SN38 or a combination of TPL and SN38 for 24 h in the co-culture model. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Unpaired student’s t-test was used to analyze the data. (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 5PSN38@TPL-nsa antitumor efficiency in the CAFs-containing intraperitoneal tumor model. a Establishment of CAFs-containing intraperitoneal tumor model and schedule of in vivo antitumor experiments. b In vivo bioluminescence imaging of the mice after intravenous injections of PBS, TPL-nsa, PSN38, PSN38 + TPL-nsa and PSN38@TPL-nsa (n = 4). White dotted lines and arrows indicated the tumor nodules. c Quantitative analysis of bioluminescence imaging intensity on Day 12. d Body weight variation in the tumor-bearing mice during the experimental period (n = 4). e Western blotting analysis of PARP, caspase-3 and BAX family proteins of tumors in the different groups at the end of experiments. f Dissected intraperitoneal tumor nodules after humanitarian execution (n = 4). g, h The intraperitoneal tumor weights (g) and nodule numbers (h) in each group were statistically analyzed. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data. (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 6The antitumor efficiency of PSN38@TPL-nsa in GC PDX model. a Therapeutic schedule of treatments of mice with GC PDX model. b The tumor growth curves after intravenous injection of PBS, TPL-nsa, PSN38, PSN38 + TPL-nsa and PSN38@TPL-nsa (n = 8). c Images of the excised tumor in the different groups at the end of in vivo antitumor evaluation (n = 8 for each group). d The average tumor weight of excised tumors in each group at the experimental endpoint. e Western blot assay of FAP and α-SMA of tumor tissues at the end of in vivo antitumor evaluation. f Body weight variation in the tumor-bearing mice during the experimental period (n = 8). All data are presented as mean ± SD. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data. (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 7PSN38@TPL-nsa remodeled GC microenvironment in vivo. a Representative image of H&E staining, IHC staining (Ki67), Masson's trichrome and Immunofluorescence staining (FAP and α-SMA) of tumors at the experimental endpoint. b–e Quantitative analysis of collagen content, Ki67, FAP and α-SMA using Image J from 3 to 5 randomly selected microscopic fields, respectively. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the data. (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)