Literature DB >> 34795014

Total-Body PET Multiparametric Imaging of Cancer Using a Voxelwise Strategy of Compartmental Modeling.

Guobao Wang1, Lorenzo Nardo2, Mamta Parikh3, Yasser G Abdelhafez2, Elizabeth Li4, Benjamin A Spencer2,4, Jinyi Qi4, Terry Jones2, Simon R Cherry2,4, Ramsey D Badawi2,4.   

Abstract

Quantitative dynamic PET with compartmental modeling has the potential to enable multiparametric imaging and more accurate quantification than static PET imaging. Conventional methods for parametric imaging commonly use a single kinetic model for all image voxels and neglect the heterogeneity of physiologic models, which can work well for single-organ parametric imaging but may significantly compromise total-body parametric imaging on a scanner with a long axial field of view. In this paper, we evaluate the necessity of voxelwise compartmental modeling strategies, including time delay correction (TDC) and model selection, for total-body multiparametric imaging.
Methods: Ten subjects (5 patients with metastatic cancer and 5 healthy volunteers) were scanned on a total-body PET/CT system after injection of 370 MBq of 18F-FDG. Dynamic data were acquired for 60 min. Total-body parametric imaging was performed using 2 approaches. One was the conventional method that uses a single irreversible 2-tissue-compartment model with and without TDC. The second approach selects the best kinetic model from 3 candidate models for individual voxels. The differences between the 2 approaches were evaluated for parametric imaging of microkinetic parameters and the 18F-FDG net influx rate, K i
Results: TDC had a nonnegligible effect on kinetic quantification of various organs and lesions. The effect was larger in lesions with a higher blood volume. Parametric imaging of K i with the standard 2-tissue-compartment model introduced vascular-region artifacts, which were overcome by the voxelwise model selection strategy.
Conclusion: The time delay and appropriate kinetic model vary in different organs and lesions. Modeling of the time delay of the blood input function and model selection improved total-body multiparametric imaging.
© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET; compartmental modeling; image processing; parametric imaging; radiotracer tissue kinetics; total-body dynamic PET

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34795014      PMCID: PMC9364337          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   11.082


  32 in total

1.  Optimization algorithms and weighting factors for analysis of dynamic PET studies.

Authors:  Maqsood Yaqub; Ronald Boellaard; Marc A Kropholler; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Imaging radiotracer model parameters in PET: a mixture analysis approach.

Authors:  F O'Sullivan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Image derived input functions for dynamic High Resolution Research Tomograph PET brain studies.

Authors:  Jurgen E M Mourik; Floris H P van Velden; Mark Lubberink; Reina W Kloet; Bart N M van Berckel; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Parametric imaging of ligand-receptor binding in PET using a simplified reference region model.

Authors:  R N Gunn; A A Lammertsma; S P Hume; V J Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Dynamic PET of human liver inflammation: impact of kinetic modeling with optimization-derived dual-blood input function.

Authors:  Guobao Wang; Michael T Corwin; Kristin A Olson; Ramsey D Badawi; Souvik Sarkar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Hepatic blood perfusion measured by 3-minute dynamic 18F-FDG PET in pigs.

Authors:  Michael Winterdahl; Ole Lajord Munk; Michael Sørensen; Frank Viborg Mortensen; Susanne Keiding
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Combination of dynamic and integral methods for generating reproducible functional CBF images.

Authors:  A A Lammertsma; V J Cunningham; M P Deiber; J D Heather; P M Bloomfield; J Nutt; R S Frackowiak; T Jones
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow using dynamic nitrogen-13-ammonia PET studies and factor analysis of dynamic structures.

Authors:  H M Wu; C K Hoh; D B Buxton; W G Kuhle; H R Schelbert; Y Choi; R A Hawkins; M E Phelps; S C Huang
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  PET image reconstruction using kernel method.

Authors:  Guobao Wang; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Clinical feasibility and impact of fully automated multiparametric PET imaging using direct Patlak reconstruction: evaluation of 103 dynamic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scans.

Authors:  Ole L Munk; Lars C Gormsen; André H Dias; Mette F Pedersen; Helle Danielsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  2 in total

1.  Relating18F-FDG image signal-to-noise ratio to time-of-flight noise-equivalent count rate in total-body PET using the uEXPLORER scanner.

Authors:  Edwin K Leung; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Eric Berg; Zhaoheng Xie; Xuezhu Zhang; Reimund Bayerlein; Benjamin Spencer; Elizabeth Li; Negar Omidvari; Aaron Selfridge; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 2.  Total-body PET/CT - First Clinical Experiences and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Quinn Kwan-Tai Ng; Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari; Negar Omidvari; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Lorenzo Nardo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.802

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.