Literature DB >> 32894338

Clinical feasibility and impact of fully automated multiparametric PET imaging using direct Patlak reconstruction: evaluation of 103 dynamic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scans.

Ole L Munk1,2, Lars C Gormsen3,4, André H Dias1, Mette F Pedersen1, Helle Danielsen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Functional imaging by standard whole-body (WB) 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is an integrated part of disease diagnostics. Recently, a clinical dynamic whole-body (D-WB) FDG PET/CT scanning protocols has been developed allowing for quantitative imaging of tissue metabolic rate of FDG (MRFDG). It was the purpose of this retrospective study to evaluate whether MRFDG imaging is feasible in a clinical setting and whether it improves lesion detectability.
METHODS: One hundred nine patients representing a broad range of referral indications for FDG PET/CT were invited to undergo a D-WB FDG PET/CT scan. Two sets of images were produced: parametric images and standard static SUV images. Both sets of images were reviewed visually, and 310 individual lesions were quantitatively analysed using the target-to-background (TBR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) metrics.
RESULTS: One hundred three out of 109 patients completed the D-WB FDG PET/CT scan. There was no difference in the number of pathological lesions identified visually on the MRFDG and the SUV images, whereas MRFDG images yielded 4 fewer false positives than the SUV images. Quantitatively, MRFDG TBR was significantly higher than SUV TBR in 299/310 lesions, and better MRFDG CNR was found to facilitate the challenging reading of lesions with low SUV TBR.
CONCLUSION: D-WB FDG PET/CT is feasible in a clinical setting and produces MRFDG images of good visual quality and superior lesion contrast. In addition, MRFDG images complement the standard SUV images providing better quantification and enhanced image reading. However, although MRFDG also reduced the number of false-positive findings, no additional malignant lesions were identified. The technique therefore appears to be best suited for select patient groups or possibly treatment response evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical; Dynamic whole-body PET; FDG; Oncology; Parametric imaging; Patlak

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32894338     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05007-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  25 in total

1.  Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage.

Authors:  Joseph A Thie
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Positron-emission tomography and assessment of cancer therapy.

Authors:  Malik E Juweid; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Monitoring chemotherapy and radiotherapy of solid tumors.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber; Hinrich Wieder
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Assessing the Effect of Various Blood Glucose Levels on 18F-FDG Activity in the Brain, Liver, and Blood Pool.

Authors:  Ismet Sarikaya; Ali Sarikaya; Prem Sharma
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2019-06-10

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography as an imaging biomarker.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value?

Authors:  J W Keyes
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Roberto Delgado-Bolton; Wim J G Oyen; Francesco Giammarile; Klaus Tatsch; Wolfgang Eschner; Fred J Verzijlbergen; Sally F Barrington; Lucy C Pike; Wolfgang A Weber; Sigrid Stroobants; Dominique Delbeke; Kevin J Donohoe; Scott Holbrook; Michael M Graham; Giorgio Testanera; Otto S Hoekstra; Josee Zijlstra; Eric Visser; Corneline J Hoekstra; Jan Pruim; Antoon Willemsen; Bertjan Arends; Jörg Kotzerke; Andreas Bockisch; Thomas Beyer; Arturo Chiti; Bernd J Krause
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Effects of blood glucose level on 18F-FDG uptake for PET/CT in normal organs: A systematic review.

Authors:  Clarice Sprinz; Stephan Altmayer; Matheus Zanon; Guilherme Watte; Klaus Irion; Edson Marchiori; Bruno Hochhegger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Early Diagnosis of Murine Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy Using Dynamic PET/CT Imaging and Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Tianxing Zhu; Jiayi Jiang; Yitai Xiao; Duo Xu; Zibin Liang; Lei Bi; Min Yang; Mingzhu Liang; Dan Li; Yong Lin
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  First results on kinetic modelling and parametric imaging of dynamic 18F-FDG datasets from a long axial FOV PET scanner in oncological patients.

Authors:  Hasan Sari; Clemens Mingels; Ian Alberts; Jicun Hu; Dorothee Buesser; Vijay Shah; Robin Schepers; Patrik Caluori; Vladimir Panin; Maurizio Conti; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Kuangyu Shi; Lars Eriksson; Axel Rominger; Paul Cumming
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Total-Body PET Multiparametric Imaging of Cancer Using a Voxelwise Strategy of Compartmental Modeling.

Authors:  Guobao Wang; Lorenzo Nardo; Mamta Parikh; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Elizabeth Li; Benjamin A Spencer; Jinyi Qi; Terry Jones; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 11.082

4.  Improved Clinical Workflow for Whole-Body Patlak Parametric Imaging Using Two Short Dynamic Acquisitions.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Ying Miao; Wenjing Yu; Gan Zhu; Tao Wu; Xuefeng Zhao; Guangjie Yuan; Biao Li; Huiqin Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Normal values for 18F-FDG uptake in organs and tissues measured by dynamic whole body multiparametric FDG PET in 126 patients.

Authors:  Ole L Munk; Lars C Gormsen; André H Dias; Allan K Hansen
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.138

6.  Clinical validation of a population-based input function for 20-min dynamic whole-body 18F-FDG multiparametric PET imaging.

Authors:  André H Dias; Anne M Smith; Vijay Shah; David Pigg; Lars C Gormsen; Ole L Munk
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-09-08

7.  Motion correction and its impact on quantification in dynamic total-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Yaping Wu; Wei Wei; Fangfang Fu; Nan Meng; Hongzhao Chen; Xiaochen Li; Yan Bai; Zhenguo Wang; Jie Ding; Debin Hu; Chaojie Chen; Zhanli Hu; Dong Liang; Xin Liu; Hairong Zheng; Yongfeng Yang; Yun Zhou; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-09-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.