Literature DB >> 34790558

Change in granulation tissue coverage and bacteriological load using Low Cost Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in acute musculoskeletal wounds.

Siddharth Pathak1, Amit Srivastava1, Aditya N Aggarwal1, Manish Chadha1, Bineeta Kashyap2, N P Singh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low cost Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressings have been considered as an alternative to traditional daily dressings. There is scanty literature evaluating the change in the percentage area of wound covered by granulation tissue following application of low-cost NPWT. The change in the bacteriological flora following application of low-cost NPWT devices has also not been evaluated.
METHODS: Patients above the age of 18 years with acute musculoskeletal injuries of <3 weeks duration which underwent a surgical debridement and required subsequent wound coverage were included in the study. Area of the wound and the area covered by the granulation tissue as well as the bacteriological count were measured before and after application of NPWT. A low cost NPWT using wall mounted vacuum device was put on the patient giving a constant negative pressure of 125 mm of Hg for 2 days. The findings before and after application of NPWT were compared and analyzed using Wilcoxin Signed-rank test.
RESULTS: 21 patients with mean age of 35.52±15.075 were included. The pre-NPWT granulation tissue area ranged from 122 mm2 to 8483 mm2 with a mean of 1648.38 mm2 (SD = 1933.866). The post-NPWT granulation tissue area ranged from 234 mm2 to 7847 mm2 with a mean of 2364.48 mm2 (SD = 1857.716). The mean increase in granulation tissue was 716.1 mm2.The pre-NPWT wound area ranged from 422 mm2 to 10847 mm2 with a mean of 4009.62 mm2 (SD = 3026.209). The post-NPWT wound area ranged from 326 mm2 to 9143 mm2 with a mean of 3410.33 mm2 (SD = 2636.206). The mean reduction in wound size was 599.29 mm2.The pre-NPWT bacteriological count ranged from 3000/ml to 130000000/ml with a mean of 12616761.90/ml (SD = 29664589.37). The post-NPWT bacteriological count ranged from 1000/ml to 380000000/ml with a mean of 26401523.81/ml. The mean increase in bacteriological count was 13784761.91/ml.
CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant decrease in wound size (p = 0.001) and statistically significant increase in percentage area of granulation tissue coverage (p = 0.000) following low cost NPWT application. However there was no statistically significant increase in bacteriological clearance in these patients.
© 2021 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low cost; Musculoskeletal injuries; Negative pressure dressing; Negative pressure wound therapy; Open wounds; Vacuum assisted closure

Year:  2021        PMID: 34790558      PMCID: PMC8577446          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  25 in total

1.  Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Chantal M Mouës; Margreet C Vos; Gert-Jan C M van den Bemd; Theo Stijnen; Steven E R Hovius
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  The clinical efficacy of the vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the management of adult osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Y Tan; X Wang; H Li; Q Zheng; J Li; G Feng; Zhijun Pan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation.

Authors:  M J Morykwas; L C Argenta; E I Shelton-Brown; W McGuirt
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Evaluation of Vacuum Assisted Closure Therapy for Soft Tissue Injury in Open Musculoskeletal Trauma.

Authors:  Manish Raj; S P S Gill; Sunil Kumar Sheopaltan; Pulkesh Singh; Jasveer Sigh; Prateek Rastogi; L N Mishra
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

5.  A Simplified Vacuum Dressing System.

Authors:  Sandro Cilindro de Souza; Carlos Henrique Briglia; Reinaldo Miranda Cavazzani
Journal:  Wounds       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.546

6.  Bacterial reduction and shift with NPWT after surgical debridements: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Thorsten Jentzsch; Georg Osterhoff; Pawel Zwolak; Burkhardt Seifert; Valentin Neuhaus; Hans-Peter Simmen; Gerrolt N Jukema
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Negative pressure wound therapy reduces pseudomonas wound contamination more than Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Steven J Lalliss; Daniel J Stinner; Scott M Waterman; Joanna G Branstetter; Brendan D Masini; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 8.  Does negative-pressure wound therapy influence subjacent bacterial growth? A systematic review.

Authors:  Graeme E Glass; George R F Murphy; Jagdeep Nanchahal
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Low-cost Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Using Wall Vacuum: A 15 Dollars by Day Alternative.

Authors:  Benoit Chaput; Ignacio Garrido; Harold Eburdery; Jean Louis Grolleau; Jean Pierre Chavoin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-07-08

10.  Cost-effective Alternative for Negative-pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  Jeff J Kim; Mieczyslawa Franczyk; Lawrence J Gottlieb; David H Song
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.