Manish Raj1, S P S Gill2, Sunil Kumar Sheopaltan2, Pulkesh Singh3, Jasveer Sigh3, Prateek Rastogi4, L N Mishra5. 1. Lecturer, Department of Orthopaedics, Uttar Pradesh Rural Institute of Medical Sciences and Research , Saifai, Etawah, U.P, India . 2. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Uttar Pradesh Rural Institute of Medical Sciences and Research , Saifai, Etawah, U.P, India . 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Uttar Pradesh Rural Institute of Medical Sciences and Research , Saifai, Etawah, U.P, India . 4. Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Uttar Pradesh Rural Institute of Medical Sciences and Research , Saifai, Etawah, U.P, India . 5. Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, UPRIMSR (Uttar Pradesh rural Institute of Medical Sciences and Research , Saifai, Etawah, U.P, India .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The application of controlled levels of negative or sub atmospheric pressure for a prolonged period of time on a wound had shown to accelerate removal of excess fluid and promote hyperaemia, which eventually promote wound healing. AIM: The study was conducted with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) therapy for soft tissue injury in open musculoskeletal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty cases of complex musculoskeletal wound involving different parts of body were included in this progressive randomized study. In patients, aggressive debridement was done before the application of VAC therapy. Controlled negative pressure was uniformly applied to the wound. Dressings were changed after every 4 to 5 days. The evaluation of results included healing rate of the wound, eradication of infection, complication rate, and number of secondary procedures. RESULTS:VAC therapy over the wound was administered for an average of 20.4 days ±6.72 days (range 14 to 42 days). There was decrease in wound size attained by VAC therapy ranged from 2.6 to 24.4cm(2), with an average reduction of 10.55 cm(2). Three wounds were infected at the start of VAC therapy. However, all patients were cleared of bacterial infection by the end of VAC therapy. CONCLUSION:VAC therapy using negative pressure promote Wound healing by increasing local capillary perfusion and increased rate of granulation tissue formation, decreases the duration of wound healing and requires fewer painful dressing change.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The application of controlled levels of negative or sub atmospheric pressure for a prolonged period of time on a wound had shown to accelerate removal of excess fluid and promote hyperaemia, which eventually promote wound healing. AIM: The study was conducted with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) therapy for soft tissue injury in open musculoskeletal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty cases of complex musculoskeletal wound involving different parts of body were included in this progressive randomized study. In patients, aggressive debridement was done before the application of VAC therapy. Controlled negative pressure was uniformly applied to the wound. Dressings were changed after every 4 to 5 days. The evaluation of results included healing rate of the wound, eradication of infection, complication rate, and number of secondary procedures. RESULTS: VAC therapy over the wound was administered for an average of 20.4 days ±6.72 days (range 14 to 42 days). There was decrease in wound size attained by VAC therapy ranged from 2.6 to 24.4cm(2), with an average reduction of 10.55 cm(2). Three wounds were infected at the start of VAC therapy. However, all patients were cleared of bacterial infection by the end of VAC therapy. CONCLUSION: VAC therapy using negative pressure promote Wound healing by increasing local capillary perfusion and increased rate of granulation tissue formation, decreases the duration of wound healing and requires fewer painful dressing change.
Authors: T E Philbeck; K T Whittington; M H Millsap; R B Briones; D G Wight; W J Schroeder Journal: Ostomy Wound Manage Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Susan Haidari; Frank F A IJpma; Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Wies Maarse; H Charles Vogely; Alex J Ramsden; Martin A McNally; Geertje A M Govaert Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 3.411