Literature DB >> 28602266

Does negative-pressure wound therapy influence subjacent bacterial growth? A systematic review.

Graeme E Glass1, George R F Murphy2, Jagdeep Nanchahal3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Negative-pressure wound therapy is a ubiquitous wound management resource. The influence of NPWT on the bacterial bioburden of the subjacent wound remains unclear. We sought to examine the evidence. DATASOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched for articles quantitatively evaluating bacterial load under NPWT.
RESULTS: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria including 4 randomised controlled trials, 8 clinical series and 12 experimental studies. Twenty studies evaluated conventional NPWT, while 4 evaluated infiltration-based NPWT. While 8 studies using conventional NPWT failed to demonstrate an observable effect on bacterial load, 7 studies reported that NPWT was inherently bacteriostatic and 5 others reported species selectivity with suppression of non-fermentative gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB), including Pseudomonas spp. Simultaneously, there was some evidence of enhanced proliferation of gram-positive cocci where the niche was cleared of NFGNB. Two of the 4 studies using infiltration-based NPWT also reported selectively impaired proliferation of Pseudomonas spp.
CONCLUSION: The assumption that NPWT suppresses bacterial proliferation is oversimplified. There is evidence that NPWT exhibits species selectivity, suppressing the proliferation of NFGNB. However, this may depopulate the niche for exploitation by gram-positive cocci. This, in turn, has implications for the use of NPWT where highly virulent strains of gram-positive cocci have been isolated and the duration of NPWT therapy and frequency of dressing changes.
Copyright © 2017 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial bioburden; Instillation therapy; NPWT; Negative-pressure wound therapy; Non-fermentative gram-negative bacilli

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28602266     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Change in granulation tissue coverage and bacteriological load using Low Cost Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in acute musculoskeletal wounds.

Authors:  Siddharth Pathak; Amit Srivastava; Aditya N Aggarwal; Manish Chadha; Bineeta Kashyap; N P Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-27

2.  The effect of NPWT in wound healing and bacterial count on deep dermal burn injury model: An experimental study.

Authors:  Reagan Resadita; M Rosadi Seswandhana; Eko Purnomo; Sharfan Anzhari; Gita Christy Gabriela; Ishandono Dachlan; Teguh Aryandono; Yohanes Widodo Wirohadidjojo
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-12

3.  Integra dermal regeneration template as the nidus of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Santiago R Gonzalez; James C Yuen
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Negative pressure wound therapy reduces the motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enhances wound healing in a rabbit ear biofilm infection model.

Authors:  Wang Guoqi; Li Zhirui; Wang Song; Li Tongtong; Zhang Lihai; Zhang Licheng; Tang Peifu
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.271

5.  Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection Model.

Authors:  Guoqi Wang; Zhirui Li; Tongtong Li; Song Wang; Lihai Zhang; Licheng Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Surgical Site Infections Complicating the Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Renal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Susanna Lam; Ngee-Soon Lau; Jerome Martin Laurence; Deborah Jean Verran
Journal:  Case Rep Transplant       Date:  2019-09-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.