Literature DB >> 34782973

Symptomatic Recurrence and Survival Outcomes After Curative Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Does Intensive Follow-up Evaluation Improve Survival?

Thiago Pereira Diniz1, Wilson L da Costa1,2, Camila Couto Gomes1, Victor Hugo F de Jesus3, Tiago C Felismino3, Silvio Melo Torres1, Héber S C Ribeiro1, Alessandro L Diniz1, André Luís de Godoy1, Igor Correia de Farias1, Emmanuel Dias-Neto4, Maria Paula Curado5, Felipe J F Coimbra6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intensive surveillance after treatment of gastric cancer patients with curative intent may lead to an earlier diagnosis of disease recurrence, but its impact on survival is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether early diagnosis of disease recurrence among asymptomatic patients was associated with long-term survival.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed patients with stages 1 to 3C gastric adenocarcinoma treated between 1999 and 2018. All recurrence events were classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic (detected by follow-up tests), and their clinicopathologic characteristics, patterns of recurrence, and survival were analyzed.
RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 669 patients treated with a total gastrectomy in 48.6% and a D2-lymphadenectomy in 88.8% of the cases. Most of the tumors were pT3-4 (46.5%), with 45.5% involving lymph node metastases and 42.3% manifesting a diffuse histology. During a median follow-up period of 80.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.3-84.8 months), 166 patients had recurrences (24.8%), 65.7% of which were symptomatic. The peritoneum was the main site of recurrence (37.2%), and peritoneal recurrence was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95%CI, 1.2-2.37). The median disease-free, post-recurrence survival, and OS periods in the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups were respectively 13.4 versus 17.2 months (p = 0.04), 11.9 versus 4.7 months (p < 0.001), and 29.9 versus 26.4 months (p = 0.21). When OS was analyzed among the patients with non-peritoneal recurrence, no difference was observed between the two groups (31.3 vs 31.1 months; p = 0.46).
CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis of asymptomatic disease recurrence did not affect the OS of the gastric cancer patients treated with curative intent. The use of intensive surveillance strategies in this scenario still requires further evidence.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curative treatment; Follow-up; Gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; Recurrence; Survival outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34782973     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10724-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

1.  Follow-up surveillance for recurrence after curative gastric cancer surgery lacks survival benefit.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kodera; Seiji Ito; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Yoshinari Mochizuki; Michitaka Fujiwara; Kenji Hibi; Katsuki Ito; Seiji Akiyama; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Early detection of nonperitoneal recurrence may contribute to survival benefit after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujiya; Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Noriyuki Nishiwaki; Hayato Omori; Wataru Takagi; Fumiko Hirata; Makoto Hikage; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  A systematic review of patient surveillance after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a brief review.

Authors:  Roberta Cardoso; Natalie G Coburn; Rajini Seevaratnam; Alyson Mahar; Lucy Helyer; Calvin Law; Simron Singh
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Effect of More vs Less Frequent Follow-up Testing on Overall and Colorectal Cancer-Specific Mortality in Patients With Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer: The COLOFOL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Peer Wille-Jørgensen; Ingvar Syk; Kenneth Smedh; Søren Laurberg; Dennis T Nielsen; Sune H Petersen; Andrew G Renehan; Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó; Lars Påhlman; Henrik T Sørensen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Intensive follow-up strategies improve outcomes in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer patients after curative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Pita-Fernández; M Alhayek-Aí; C González-Martín; B López-Calviño; T Seoane-Pillado; S Pértega-Díaz
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Follow-up after surgery for gastric cancer: how to do it.

Authors:  Daniela Zanotti; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Arianna Coniglio; Borzoueh Mohammadi; Silvia Ministrini; Muntzer Mughal; Guido A M Tiberio; Khaled Dawas
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-03-26

7.  Value of intensive follow-up of patients after curative surgery for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Ing Tuan Tan; Bok Yan Jimmy So
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 8.  Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Tamaki Noie; Manabu Ohashi; Koji Oba; Yutaka Takahashi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Di M Jiang; Chihiro Suzuki; Osvaldo Espin-Garcia; Charles H Lim; Lucy X Ma; Peiran Sun; Hao-Wen Sim; Akina Natori; Bryan A Chan; Stephanie Moignard; Eric X Chen; Geoffrey Liu; Carol J Swallow; Gail E Darling; Rebecca Wong; Raymond W Jang; Elena Elimova
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The LncRNA DUXAP10 Could Function as a Promising Oncogene in Human Cancer.

Authors:  Junjie Zhao; Lixia Xu; Zihui Dong; Yize Zhang; Junhua Cao; Jie Yao; Jiyuan Xing
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.