Literature DB >> 34779791

What Is Important to Patients Who Are Recovering From an Open Tibial Fracture? A Qualitative Study.

Jessica Nightingale1,2, Kyle Lin Shu'an2, Brigitte E Scammell1,2, Paul Leighton3, Ben J Ollivere1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open tibial fracture research has traditionally focused on surgical techniques; however, despite technological advances, outcomes from these injuries remain poor, with patients facing a sustained reduced quality of life. Research has rarely asked patients what is important to them after an open tibial fracture, and this question could potentially offer great insight into how to support patients. A qualitative study may assist in our understanding of this subject. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What common themes did patients who have experienced open tibial fractures share? (2) What stresses and coping strategies did those patients articulate? (3) What sources for acquiring coping strategies did patients say they benefited from?
METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with patients who had sustained an open tibial fracture between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2019. All participants were recruited from a Level 1 trauma center in England, and 26 participants were included. The mean age was 44 ± 17 years, and 77% (20 of 26) were men. The patients' injuries ranged in severity, and they had a range of treatments and complications. Transcripts were analyzed using framework analysis, with codes subsequently organized into themes and subthemes.
RESULTS: Four themes were identified, which included recouping physical mobility, values around treatment, fears about poor recovery, and coping strategies to reduce psychological burden. Coping strategies were important in mitigating the psychological burden of injury. Task-focused coping strategies were preferred by patients and perceived as taking a proactive approach to recovery. Healthcare practitioners, and others with lived experience were able to educate patients on coping, but such resources were scant and therefore probably less accessible to those with the greatest need.
CONCLUSION: Most individuals fail to return to previous activities, and it is unlikely that improvements in surgical techniques will make major improvements in patient outcomes in the near future. Investment in psychosocial support could potentially improve patient experience and outcomes. Digital information platforms and group rehabilitation clinics were identified as potential avenues for development that could offer individuals better psychosocial support with minimal additional burden for surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Copyright © 2021 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34779791      PMCID: PMC8747585          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.755


  22 in total

1.  Longitudinal relationships between anxiety, depression, and pain: results from a two-year cohort study of lower extremity trauma patients.

Authors:  Renan C Castillo; Stephen T Wegener; Sara E Heins; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Ellen J MacKenzie; Michael J Bosse
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Patient Experiences of Life Years After Severe Civilian Lower Extremity Trauma With Vascular Injury.

Authors:  K Bernhoff; M Björck; J Larsson; E Jangland
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 7.069

3.  Amputation versus reconstruction in traumatic defects of the leg: outcome and costs.

Authors:  R Hertel; N Strebel; R Ganz
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  An analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after leg-threatening injuries.

Authors:  Michael J Bosse; Ellen J MacKenzie; James F Kellam; Andrew R Burgess; Lawrence X Webb; Marc F Swiontkowski; Roy W Sanders; Alan L Jones; Mark P McAndrew; Brendan M Patterson; Melissa L McCarthy; Thomas G Travison; Renan C Castillo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Hope in orthopaedic trauma: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tutton; Kate Seers; Deborah Langstaff
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 6.  The epidemiology of open fractures in adults. A 15-year review.

Authors:  Charles M Court-Brown; Kate E Bugler; Nicholas D Clement; Andrew D Duckworth; Margaret M McQueen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  A qualitative study of recovery from type III-B and III-C tibial fractures.

Authors:  Melissa S Shauver; Maya S Aravind; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  A qualitative approach to recovery after open tibial fracture: the road to a novel, patient-derived recovery scale.

Authors:  R W Trickett; Elizabeth Mudge; Patricia Price; Ian Pallister
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Management on 12-Month Disability Among Adults With Severe Open Fracture of the Lower Limb: The WOLLF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Matthew L Costa; Juul Achten; Julie Bruce; Elizabeth Tutton; Stavros Petrou; Sarah E Lamb; Nick R Parsons
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Patient experience of long-term recovery after open fracture of the lower limb: a qualitative study using interviews in a community setting.

Authors:  Sophie Rees; Elizabeth Tutton; Juul Achten; Julie Bruce; Matthew L Costa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What Is Important to Patients Who Are Recovering From an Open Tibial Fracture? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Brett D Crist
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.