Literature DB >> 22356720

A qualitative approach to recovery after open tibial fracture: the road to a novel, patient-derived recovery scale.

R W Trickett1, Elizabeth Mudge, Patricia Price, Ian Pallister.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to describe how patients perceive their recovery following open tibial fractures using a qualitative approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following the appropriate ethical approval, adult patients with a diagnosis of open tibial fracture were recruited after completion of their surgical treatment and discharge from Morriston Hospital, a centre with orthoplastic surgical care. A purposive sampling method was employed to ensure that a range of injuries as well as clinical outcomes were included. All patients took part in an in-depth semi-structured interview, exploring aspects of their injury, treatment, rehabilitation and psychosocial and financial situations. Interviews were completed with two interviewers present and were recorded for verbatim transcription. Interview transcripts were analysed to identify items important to patients during their recovery.
RESULTS: Nine patients with a mean injury to interview interval of 2.3 years were interviewed. A total of 538 items were identified and subsequently mapped onto 18 categories: pain; mobility; flexibility; temperature (effects on symptoms); fear; appearance; sleep; diet/weight; employment; social; finance; impact on others; self-care; recovery (patient perceptions of recovery); frustration; goal setting (by patients and health-care providers); and adaptation (both physical and mental).
CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of factors that our cohort found important during their recovery from open tibial fracture. Despite being considered as 'healed' by the medical staff, patients did not report a corresponding full recovery and return to pre-injury normality. The categories identified will enable the development of a patient-reported recovery scale to be used in lower-limb trauma.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22356720     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  12 in total

1.  What Is Important to Patients Who Are Recovering From an Open Tibial Fracture? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Jessica Nightingale; Kyle Lin Shu'an; Brigitte E Scammell; Paul Leighton; Ben J Ollivere
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 2.  Exploring what is important to patients with regards to quality of life after experiencing a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  H Leggett; A Scantlebury; A Byrne; M Harden; C Hewitt; G O'Carroll; H Sharma; C McDaid
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Patient-reported Outcome Instruments in Lower Extremity Trauma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; A Jordan Grier; E Hope Weissler; Matthew J Carty; Andrea L Pusic; Scott T Hollenbeck; Mark J Gage
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-03

4.  Patient experience of long-term recovery after open fracture of the lower limb: a qualitative study using interviews in a community setting.

Authors:  Sophie Rees; Elizabeth Tutton; Juul Achten; Julie Bruce; Matthew L Costa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Successful recovery following musculoskeletal trauma: protocol for a qualitative study of patients' and physiotherapists' perceptions.

Authors:  N Middlebrook; N R Heneghan; D Falla; L Silvester; A B Rushton; A A Soundy
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Treatment of severely open tibial fractures, non-unions, and fracture-related infections with a gentamicin-coated tibial nail-clinical outcomes including quality of life analysis and psychological ICD-10-based symptom rating.

Authors:  Nike Walter; Daniel Popp; Viola Freigang; Michael Nerlich; Volker Alt; Markus Rupp
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Measuring recovery after open lower limb fractures: combined objective functional tests and global perceived recovery outperform narrower metrics and a standard generic patient reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Ian Pallister; Gregory Jack Handley; Sharon Maggs; Ann-Marie Davies; Amanda Kyle; Owen Bodger; Hywel Dafydd
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Co-producing a multi-stakeholder Core Outcome Set for distal Tibia and Ankle fractures (COSTA): a study protocol.

Authors:  Nathan A Pearson; Elizabeth Tutton; Alexander Joeris; Stephen Gwilym; Richard Grant; David J Keene; Kirstie L Haywood
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Diagnostic support for selected neuromuscular diseases using answer-pattern recognition and data mining techniques: a proof of concept multicenter prospective trial.

Authors:  Lorenz Grigull; Werner Lechner; Susanne Petri; Katja Kollewe; Reinhard Dengler; Sandra Mehmecke; Ulrike Schumacher; Thomas Lücke; Christiane Schneider-Gold; Cornelia Köhler; Anne-Katrin Güttsches; Xiaowei Kortum; Frank Klawonn
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Systematic review of risk prediction studies in bone and joint infection: are modifiable prognostic factors useful in predicting recurrence?

Authors:  Maria Dudareva; Andrew Hotchen; Martin A McNally; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Matthew Scarborough; Gary Collins
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.