R W Trickett1, Elizabeth Mudge, Patricia Price, Ian Pallister. 1. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK. ryan@trickett00.fsnet.co.uk
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to describe how patients perceive their recovery following open tibial fractures using a qualitative approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following the appropriate ethical approval, adult patients with a diagnosis of open tibial fracture were recruited after completion of their surgical treatment and discharge from Morriston Hospital, a centre with orthoplastic surgical care. A purposive sampling method was employed to ensure that a range of injuries as well as clinical outcomes were included. All patients took part in an in-depth semi-structured interview, exploring aspects of their injury, treatment, rehabilitation and psychosocial and financial situations. Interviews were completed with two interviewers present and were recorded for verbatim transcription. Interview transcripts were analysed to identify items important to patients during their recovery. RESULTS: Nine patients with a mean injury to interview interval of 2.3 years were interviewed. A total of 538 items were identified and subsequently mapped onto 18 categories: pain; mobility; flexibility; temperature (effects on symptoms); fear; appearance; sleep; diet/weight; employment; social; finance; impact on others; self-care; recovery (patient perceptions of recovery); frustration; goal setting (by patients and health-care providers); and adaptation (both physical and mental). CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of factors that our cohort found important during their recovery from open tibial fracture. Despite being considered as 'healed' by the medical staff, patients did not report a corresponding full recovery and return to pre-injury normality. The categories identified will enable the development of a patient-reported recovery scale to be used in lower-limb trauma.
AIM: The aim of this study was to describe how patients perceive their recovery following open tibial fractures using a qualitative approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following the appropriate ethical approval, adult patients with a diagnosis of open tibial fracture were recruited after completion of their surgical treatment and discharge from Morriston Hospital, a centre with orthoplastic surgical care. A purposive sampling method was employed to ensure that a range of injuries as well as clinical outcomes were included. All patients took part in an in-depth semi-structured interview, exploring aspects of their injury, treatment, rehabilitation and psychosocial and financial situations. Interviews were completed with two interviewers present and were recorded for verbatim transcription. Interview transcripts were analysed to identify items important to patients during their recovery. RESULTS: Nine patients with a mean injury to interview interval of 2.3 years were interviewed. A total of 538 items were identified and subsequently mapped onto 18 categories: pain; mobility; flexibility; temperature (effects on symptoms); fear; appearance; sleep; diet/weight; employment; social; finance; impact on others; self-care; recovery (patient perceptions of recovery); frustration; goal setting (by patients and health-care providers); and adaptation (both physical and mental). CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of factors that our cohort found important during their recovery from open tibial fracture. Despite being considered as 'healed' by the medical staff, patients did not report a corresponding full recovery and return to pre-injury normality. The categories identified will enable the development of a patient-reported recovery scale to be used in lower-limb trauma.
Authors: Jessica Nightingale; Kyle Lin Shu'an; Brigitte E Scammell; Paul Leighton; Ben J Ollivere Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: H Leggett; A Scantlebury; A Byrne; M Harden; C Hewitt; G O'Carroll; H Sharma; C McDaid Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Lily R Mundy; A Jordan Grier; E Hope Weissler; Matthew J Carty; Andrea L Pusic; Scott T Hollenbeck; Mark J Gage Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2019-05-03
Authors: N Middlebrook; N R Heneghan; D Falla; L Silvester; A B Rushton; A A Soundy Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Nathan A Pearson; Elizabeth Tutton; Alexander Joeris; Stephen Gwilym; Richard Grant; David J Keene; Kirstie L Haywood Journal: Trials Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Maria Dudareva; Andrew Hotchen; Martin A McNally; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Matthew Scarborough; Gary Collins Journal: J Bone Jt Infect Date: 2021-07-08