Literature DB >> 12477942

An analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after leg-threatening injuries.

Michael J Bosse1, Ellen J MacKenzie, James F Kellam, Andrew R Burgess, Lawrence X Webb, Marc F Swiontkowski, Roy W Sanders, Alan L Jones, Mark P McAndrew, Brendan M Patterson, Melissa L McCarthy, Thomas G Travison, Renan C Castillo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage for severe trauma has replaced amputation as the primary treatment in many trauma centers. However, long-term outcomes after limb reconstruction or amputation have not been fully evaluated.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study to determine the functional outcomes of 569 patients with severe leg injuries resulting in reconstruction or amputation. The principal outcome measure was the Sickness Impact Profile, a multidimensional measure of self-reported health status (scores range from 0 to 100; scores for the general population average 2 to 3, and scores greater than 10 represent severe disability). Secondary outcomes included limb status and the presence or absence of major complications resulting in rehospitalization.
RESULTS: At two years, there was no significant difference in scores for the Sickness Impact Profile between the amputation and reconstruction groups (12.6 vs. 11.8, P=0.53). After adjustment for the characteristics of the patients and their injuries, patients who underwent amputation had functional outcomes that were similar to those of patients who underwent reconstruction. Predictors of a poorer score for the Sickness Impact Profile included rehospitalization for a major complication, a low educational level, nonwhite race, poverty, lack of private health insurance, poor social-support network, low self-efficacy (the patient's confidence in being able to resume life activities), smoking, and involvement in disability-compensation litigation. Patients who underwent reconstruction were more likely to be rehospitalized than those who underwent amputation (47.6 percent vs. 33.9 percent, P=0.002). Similar proportions of patients who underwent amputation and patients who underwent reconstruction had returned to work by two years (53.0 percent and 49.4 percent, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with limbs at high risk for amputation can be advised that reconstruction typically results in two-year outcomes equivalent to those of amputation. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477942     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  144 in total

1.  Amputation and the assessment of limb viability: perceptions of two hundred and thirty two orthopaedic trainees.

Authors:  W G P Eardley; D M Taylor; P J Parker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Delayed short-course treatment with teriparatide (PTH(1-34)) improves femoral allograft healing by enhancing intramembranous bone formation at the graft-host junction.

Authors:  Masahiko Takahata; Edward M Schwarz; Tony Chen; Regis J O'Keefe; Hani A Awad
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  A systematic review of outcomes and complications of reconstruction and amputation for type IIIB and IIIC fractures of the tibia.

Authors:  Daniel Saddawi-Konefka; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Is Use of a Psychological Workbook Associated With Improved Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scores in Patients With Distal Radius Fracture?

Authors:  Stuart Goudie; Diane Dixon; Gail McMillan; David Ring; Margaret McQueen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Proximal tibial metaphyseal fractures with severe soft tissue injury: clinical and functional results at 2 years.

Authors:  James S Starman; Renan C Castillo; Michael J Bosse; Ellen J MacKenzie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  [Current concepts of polytrauma management: from ATLS to "damage control"].

Authors:  P F Stahel; C E Heyde; W Wyrwich; W Ertel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  A cost-utility analysis of amputation versus salvage for Gustilo type IIIB and IIIC open tibial fractures.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Daniel Saddawi-Konefka; Steven C Haase; Gautam Kaul
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Hip Fracture Care.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Joseph M Lane; Ting Jung Pan; Michael L Parks; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Psychosocial Factors Predict Pain and Physical Health After Lower Extremity Trauma.

Authors:  Kristin R Archer; Christine M Abraham; William T Obremskey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Compressive fatigue and fracture toughness behavior of injectable, settable bone cements.

Authors:  Andrew J Harmata; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Scott A Guelcher; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.