Literature DB >> 34777832

BOIN: a novel Bayesian design platform to accelerate early phase brain tumor clinical trials.

Ying Yuan1, Jing Wu2, Mark R Gilbert2.   

Abstract

Despite decades of extensive research, the progress in developing effective treatments for primary brain tumors lags behind that of other cancers, largely due to the unique challenges of brain tumors (eg, the blood-brain barrier and high heterogeneity) that limit the delivery and efficacy of many therapeutic agents. One way to address this issue is to employ novel trial designs to better optimize the treatment regimen (eg, dose and schedule) in early phase trials to improve the success rate of subsequent phase III trials. The objective of this article is to introduce Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) designs as a novel platform to design various types of early phase brain tumor trials, including single-agent and combination regimen trials, trials with late-onset toxicities, and trials aiming to find the optimal biological dose (OBD) based on both toxicity and efficacy. Unlike many novel Bayesian adaptive designs, which are difficult to understand and complicated to implement by clinical investigators, the BOIN designs are self-explanatory and user friendly, yet yield more robust and powerful operating characteristics than conventional designs. We illustrate the BOIN designs using a phase I clinical trial of brain tumor and provide software (freely available at www.trialdesign.org) to facilitate the application of the BOIN design.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian adaptive designs; Bayesian optimal interval design; biological optimal dose; maximum tolerated dose; model-assisted design

Year:  2021        PMID: 34777832      PMCID: PMC8579094          DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurooncol Pract        ISSN: 2054-2577


  35 in total

1.  Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding in drug-combination trials.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  BOIN12: Bayesian Optimal Interval Phase I/II Trial Design for Utility-Based Dose Finding in Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Yanhong Zhou; Fangrong Yan; Daniel Li; Ying Yuan
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-11-16

3.  STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Carlos Gomez-Roca; L Rhoda Molife; Bhavesh Anghan; Antonin Levy; Ian Judson; Johann De Bono; Jean-Charles Soria; Stan Kaye; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A hierarchical Bayesian design for phase I trials of novel combinations of cancer therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Shufang Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Continual reassessment method for partial ordering.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Ping Liu; Yisheng Li; B Nebiyou Bekele
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  A Bayesian Dose-finding Design for Oncology Clinical Trials of Combinational Biological Agents.

Authors:  Chunyan Cai; Ying Yuan; Yuan Ji
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.864

Review 9.  Early phase clinical trials to identify optimal dosing and safety.

Authors:  Natalie Cook; Aaron R Hansen; Lillian L Siu; Albiruni R Abdul Razak
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  A comprehensive comparison of the continual reassessment method to the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme in Phase I dose-finding studies.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Andrew S Wilton; Elyn R Riedel; Venkatraman E Seshan; David R Spriggs
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.