| Literature DB >> 34769239 |
Janet Juarez-Escobar1, Esaú Bojórquez-Velázquez1, Jose M Elizalde-Contreras1, José A Guerrero-Analco2, Víctor M Loyola-Vargas2, Martín Mata-Rosas3, Eliel Ruiz-May1.
Abstract
Embryogenesis is the primary developmental program in plants. The mechanisms that underlie the regulation of embryogenesis are an essential research subject given its potential contribution to mass in vitro propagation of profitable plant species. Somatic embryogenesis (SE) refers to the use of in vitro techniques to mimic the sexual reproduction program known as zygotic embryogenesis (ZE). In this review, we synthesize the current state of research on proteomic and metabolomic studies of SE and ZE in angiosperms (monocots and dicots) and gymnosperms. The most striking finding was the small number of studies addressing ZE. Meanwhile, the research effort focused on SE has been substantial but disjointed. Together, these research gaps may explain why the embryogenic induction stage and the maturation of the somatic embryo continue to be bottlenecks for efficient and large-scale regeneration of plants. Comprehensive and integrative studies of both SE and ZE are needed to provide the molecular foundation of plant embryogenesis, information which is needed to rationally guide experimental strategies to solve SE drawbacks in each species.Entities:
Keywords: angiosperms; gymnosperms; metabolomics; proteomics; somatic embryogenesis; zygotic embryogenesis
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34769239 PMCID: PMC8583726 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Visual representation of plant embryogenesis. Schematic representation of stereotypical morphological stages of zygotic embryo development in angiosperms and gymnosperms (A) Dicots of the Onagrad (Brassicaceae) type in Arabidopsis thaliana (a); monocots based on maize (Poaceae, (b) and gymnosperms (conifers, (c)). Embryo structures are not drawn to scale. Cells with dark nuclei at early stages contribute to the embryo, while cells without drawn nuclei contribute to the suspensor. Proembryo formation in dicots comprises polarity specification and formation of the suspensor and embryo proper; in monocots the suspensor region arises from irregular cell divisions of the three-celled structure; and in gymnosperms, it comprises the divisions before the suspensor elongation. Embryo development involves embryonic tissue and organ system establishment at the globular to heart-torpedo transition, or globular to scutellar stage, in dicots and monocots respectively (in nongrass monocots, the embryo has neither the coleoptile nor the coleorhiza); and the suspensor elongation and polar meristems formation in gymnosperms. Col, coleoptile; L, leaf; scu, scutellum; su, suspensor. (Own adaptation from [15,16,17]). Schematic representation of common morphological stages of somatic embryogenesis in angiosperms and gymnosperms (B). dicots, shown for A. thaliana (a); monocots shown for Z. mays (b); gymnosperms (c), shown for Norway spruce. In b, leaf primordia (LP); in c, proembryogenic masses (PEMs). The embryo structures are not drawn to scale. We show the major molecular events needed to achieve the somatic-to-embryogenic cell transition which also represent the most frequently faced problems during the induction and proliferation phase, while during maturation it is the programming of the somatic embryo conversion potential to plantlet.
Figure 2Tree Map of biological process of proteins overaccumulated in EC or NEC based on available proteomics approaches. The gene ontology enrichment of proteins was carried out with DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 and Revigo (http://revigo.irb.hr/, accessed on 27 September 2021) for reduced visual gene ontology terms. Visual representation of data related to dicots (A), monocots (B) and gymnosperms (C). Numbers in figure: negative regulation of long-day photoperiodism, flowering (1), positive regulation of gene expression (2), metabolic process (3), DNA ligation involved in DNA repair (4), vitamin E biosynthesis (5), microtubule-based process (6), protein refolding (7), biosynthetic process (8), unidimensional cell growth (9), seed coat development (10), photorespiration (11), pyrimidine nucleobase metabolism (13), photosynthesis (14), ‘de novo’ GDP-L-fucose biosynthetic process (15), ‘de novo’ pyrimidine nucleobase biosynthetic process (16), wax biosynthesis (17), cell wall pectin metabolism (18), response to other organism (19), amylopectin biosynthesis (20), starch biosynthesis (21), DNA replication (22), transcription by RNA polymerase I (23), chromosome segregation (24), carbohydrate metabolism (25), protein folding (26), ATP metabolic process (27), selenium compound metabolism (28), glycerol-3-phosphate metabolism (29), one-carbon metabolism (30), cellular amino acid biosynthesis (31), cell plate assembly (32), actin filament bundle assembly (33), positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assembly (34), protein targeting to chloroplast (35), calcium ion transmembrane transport (36), glycosyl compound metabolism (37), cortical microtubule organization (38), intra-Golgi vesicle-mediated transport (39), cell redox a homeostasis (40), amino sugar metabolism (41), dTDP-rhamnose biosynthesis (42), glycoside Catabolism (43), L-ascorbate biosynthesis (44), (R)-2-hydroxy-alpha-linolenate biosynthesis (45), mRNA splicing, via spliceosome (46), heterochromatin organization (47), heterochromatin organization (48).
Figure 3Enrichment analysis of available metabolomics data in EC and NEC in dicots (A), monocots (B) and gymnosperms (C). We computed KEGG annotations in metaboanalyst 5.0 bioinformatic platform (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/, accessed on 27 September 2021). We used the library of 1072 sub chemical class metabolite sets.
Figure 4Flavonoids, L-tryptophan, indole-3-acetate and cytokinin-O-glucosides pathways-based plant metabolic pathways data based (https://plantcyc.org/, accessed on 27 September 2021). For P. americana, Arabidopsis homologs were used. We used fold change values and spot intensities of proteins and concentration of metabolites reported in each study. We used KEGG annotation for metabolite analysis.
Figure 5Visual representation of gluconeogenesis, and sucrose biosynthetic metabolic pathways highlighting the maturation stage of somatic and zygotic embryos. We used Arabidopsis homolog proteins for J. curcas, A. platanoides, S. officinarum and O. sativa. We built the metabolic pathways as indicated in Figure 4.
Figure 6Number of publications on zygotic and somatic embryogenesis in angiosperms and gymnosperms using proteomic and/or metabolomic approaches in the last decade. Bubble and illustration size are proportional to the number of reviewed publications and plant group, respectively.