| Literature DB >> 34768534 |
Xue Dong1,2, Ruxin Zhang3, Simon Zhornitsky2, Thang M Le2, Wuyi Wang2, Chiang-Shan R Li2,4,5, Sheng Zhang2.
Abstract
Internet addiction is associated with a range of psychological risk factors such as childhood trauma and depression. Studies have also suggested sex differences in internet and other behavioral addictions. However, it remains unclear how childhood trauma, depression and internet addiction inter-relate differently between the sexes. A total of 1749 adolescents and young adults aged 12-27 participated in a survey of sociodemographic characteristics and standardized assessments to evaluate internet addiction (Internet Addiction Test), childhood trauma (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire) and depression (Beck Depression Inventory). Mediation and path analyses were used to examine the relationship between childhood trauma, depression and internet addiction. Internet-addicted females relative to males showed more severe depression but the control participants showed the opposite. Childhood trauma was associated with depression for both internet-addicted males and females; however, internet-addicted females but not males showed significant associations between depression and the severity of internet addiction as well as between childhood trauma and the severity of internet addiction. Further, in females, depression mediated the correlations between all types of childhood trauma and the severity of internet addiction. A path analysis suggested that sexual abuse and emotional neglect contributed most significantly to internet addiction when all types of childhood trauma were examined in one model. The findings suggest sex differences in the relationship between childhood trauma, depression and internet addiction. Childhood trauma contributes to internet addiction through depression only in females. The findings may guide future prevention and intervention strategies of internet addiction.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; childhood trauma; depression; internet addiction; young adults
Year: 2021 PMID: 34768534 PMCID: PMC8584624 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Flowchart of the selection of study participants.
Figure 2Mean and error bar (SD) plot of the BDI, IAT and CTQ totals and subscores shown separately for internet-addicted males, internet-addicted females, control males and control females. Significant group effects by sex interaction are represented by the cross lines between the internet–addicted males–control males and the internet–addicted females–control females.
Sociodemographic and clinical variables in the internet-addicted (IA) and control groups.
| Characteristic | Male IA | Female IA | Male Control | Female Control | Group | Sex | Group * Sex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 18.68 ± 1.78 | 18.01 ± 1.82 | 18.49 ± 1.94 | 18.39 ± 1.83 | F = 0.81 | F = 13.21 | F = 7.19 |
| Race | |||||||
| Han ethnicity | 178 (91.3%) | 188 (95.9%) | 633 (92.8%) | 627 (92.8%) | χ2 = 0.31 | χ2 = 0.65 | χ2 = 3.53 |
| Other ethnicity | 17 (8.7%) | 8 (4.1%) | 49 (7.2%) | 49 (7.2%) | |||
| Academic success | |||||||
| Very good | 18 (9.2%) | 7 (3.6%) | 54 (7.9%) | 46 (6.8%) | χ2 = 25.17 | χ2 = 33.59 | χ2 = 61.61 |
| Good | 57 (29.2%) | 64 (32.7%) | 261 (38.3%) | 276 (40.8%) | |||
| Moderate | 78 (40.0%) | 100 (51.0%) | 280 (41.1%) | 319 (47.2%) | |||
| Poor | 42 (21.5%) | 25 (12.8%) | 87 (12.8%) | 35 (5.2%) | |||
| IAT | 57.40 ± 6.53 | 58.67 ± 6.93 | 35.91 ± 6.38 | 34.01 ± 5.07 | F = 4496.04 | F = 0.86 | F = 21.28 |
| BDI | 23.88 ± 12.91 | 26.53 ± 11.87 | 6.75 ± 9.71 | 3.92 ± 3.28 | F = 1592.42 | F = 0.033 | F = 30.27 |
| CTQ | 61.80 ± 11.56 | 58.20 ± 11.06 | 37.16 ± 10.21 | 33.23 ± 5.87 | F = 2263.62 | F = 52.18 | F = 0.100 |
| EA | 10.92 ± 3.79 | 10.80 ± 3.94 | 6.70 ± 2.26 | 6.39 ± 1.79 | F = 861.57 | F = 2.04 | F = 0.400 |
| PA | 11.34 ± 3.48 | 8.89 ± 2.47 | 5.91 ± 1.72 | 5.35 ± 1.07 | F = 1679.31 | F = 190.19 | F = 74.97 |
| SA | 10.86 ± 4.18 | 9.48 ± 3.61 | 5.84 ± 2.19 | 5.27 ± 1.19 | F = 1113.39 | F = 48.97 | F = 8.50 |
| EN | 16.31 ± 3.75 | 16.70 ± 3.70 | 9.80 ± 3.77 | 8.45 ± 2.41 | F = 1520.52 | F = 6.55 | F = 21.15 |
| PN | 12.78 ± 2.94 | 12.71 ± 2.54 | 8.91 ± 3.18 | 7.77 ± 2.54 | F = 727.81 | F = 13.90 | F = 10.67 |
Values are mean ± SD or the actual number (percentage %); IAT = Internet Addiction Test; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; CTQ = Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; EA = emotional abuse subscale; PA = physical abuse subscale; SA = sexual abuse subscale; EN = emotional neglect subscale; PN = physical neglect subscale; statistically significant difference: p < 0.05 *; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.001 ***.
Figure 3Linear regression of the BDI, IAT and CTQ totals and subscores shown separately for the internet-addicted males and females with age as a covariate. Each data point represents the residual after accounting for age. Green (crosses) and orange (circles) show the data points and regression lines for males and females, respectively.
Figure 4Mediation analysis of the BDI, IAT and CTQ totals (A) and subscores (B–F) in internet-addicted females. The p-values associated with mediation are for the path “a × b” (see Section 2.4). All models are significant, suggesting that the BDI mediated the relationship between the CTQ total/subscores and the IAT score. Specifically, the relationships of the CTQ total and the EA, PA and PN scores with the IAT were completely mediated by the BDI score.
Figure 5Path analysis of childhood trauma (CTQ subscores), the severity of depression (BDI score) and internet addiction (IAT score) for female internet-addicted individuals. EA = emotional abuse subscale; PA = physical abuse subscale; SA = sexual abuse subscale; EN = emotional neglect subscale; PN = physical neglect subscale. e1 and e2 represent the error terms of the BDI and IAT scores. The value on each path indicates the standardized coefficient. ***: p < 0.001; **: p < 0.01; *: p < 0.05.