Literature DB >> 34765415

Patient understanding of diagnostic ultrasound examinations in an Australian private radiology clinic.

Amy Starcevich1, Paul Lombardo1, Michal Schneider1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine patient understanding and expectations of ultrasound imaging and its safety, sources of examination information and levels of examination anxiety.
METHODS: 1070 consecutive patients presenting to a private, regional radiology practice in New South Wales, Australia between 16th May and 14th June 2019, were invited to complete a survey while waiting for their non-interventional ultrasound examination. The survey included questions on demographic characteristics, knowledge such as examination risks and safety, ultrasound expectations such as dissemination of results, sources of examination information and levels of participant anxiety. Data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis tests (SPSS v. 25) to determine statistical associations between participant demographic factors, knowledge, anxiety level and the main source of examination information.
RESULTS: A total of 215/1070 (20%) patients voluntarily participated in the study. Most were female (74%, 159/215), with a median (range) age of 55 (18-92) years. Participant's median (range) score of ultrasound imaging knowledge was 3 (0-5) scored out of six and indicated uncertainty regarding the ultrasound procedure, result dissemination and ultrasound safety. Participants with previous personal experience had significantly higher levels of ultrasound imaging knowledge than those whose primary information source was their referring doctor (P = 0.0005) or the internet (P = 0.026). Significantly higher levels of ultrasound examination knowledge were also associated with lower self-reported levels of anxiety (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Participants had incomplete ultrasound examination knowledge, including misconceptions regarding safety and result dissemination, some of which could be clarified by the sonographer at the beginning of the ultrasound examination.
© 2020 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; patient knowledge; patient understanding; ultrasound

Year:  2020        PMID: 34765415      PMCID: PMC8412012          DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 1836-6864


  22 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review on physician's knowledge about radiation doses and radiation risks of computed tomography.

Authors:  Lucian Krille; Gaël P Hammer; Hiltrud Merzenich; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Patients and doctors--evolution of a relationship.

Authors:  Robert D Truog
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Brain Surface Heating After Exposure to Ultrasound: An Analysis Using Thermography.

Authors:  Michal E Schneider; Paul Lombardo
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Information about radiation dose and risks in connection with radiological examinations: what patients would like to know.

Authors:  Leila Ukkola; Heljä Oikarinen; Anja Henner; Hilkka Honkanen; Marianne Haapea; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The Internet as a potential source of information about radiological procedures for patients.

Authors:  K M Horton; M R Garland; E K Fishman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  A snapshot of patients' awareness of radiation dose and risks associated with medical imaging examinations at an Australian radiology clinic.

Authors:  N Singh; A Mohacsy; D A Connell; M E Schneider
Journal:  Radiography (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-17

7.  Syrian women's perceptions and experiences of ultrasound screening in pregnancy: implications for antenatal policy.

Authors:  Hyam Bashour; Raghda Hafez; Asmaa Abdulsalam
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2005-05

8.  Shared decision-making: is it time to obtain informed consent before radiologic examinations utilizing ionizing radiation? Legal and ethical implications.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 9.  Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.

Authors:  Michael Jefford; Rosemary Moore
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Assessing local patients' knowledge and awareness of radiation dose and risks associated with medical imaging: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Ho-kwan Sin; Chun-Sing Wong; Bingsheng Huang; Ka-ling Yiu; Wai-lam Wong; Yiu Ching Tiffany Chu
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 1.735

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.