Literature DB >> 10696601

The Internet as a potential source of information about radiological procedures for patients.

K M Horton1, M R Garland, E K Fishman.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine what percentage of patients in a typical radiology outpatient setting own or have access to a computer with internet capabilities and how many of these patients would find an educational radiology website useful. During a 3-month period, surveys were given to all adult outpatients undergoing computed tomography. The survey asked 4 questions: (1) Do you own a computer?, (2) If you own a computer, does it have Internet access?, (3) If you do not own a computer, do you have access to a computer with Internet capabilities?, and (4) If we provide helpful information regarding preparation for and the conduct of various radiological procedures on the Internet, would you use it? Four hundred surveys were collected. Two hundred one of the respondents (50.3%) owned a computer; 189 of the 201 (94.0%) had Internet access on their computer or had access to another computer with Internet capabilities. One hundred ninety-nine of the 400 respondents (49.8%) did not own a computer, 57 of these (28.6%) had access to a computer and the Internet. Of the 246 of those with Internet access, 205 (83.3%) indicated that they would use a website that provided helpful information regarding radiological examinations. The Internet is an excellent resource for educational information for patients about various radiological procedures. This study showed that 61.5% of patients had access to the Internet, and 83.3% of these would use such a site. It is likely that these numbers will increase with the rapid growth of the Internet and the steadily increasing number of homes with computers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10696601      PMCID: PMC3453431          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  Radiology uses of the Internet.

Authors:  H Krug; D Cheng
Journal:  Radiol Manage       Date:  1995

Review 2.  Teaching radiology on the internet.

Authors:  A C Downie
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Inside BrighamRAD: providing radiology teaching cases on the Internet.

Authors:  G L Mammone; B L Holman; R A Greenes; J A Parker; R Khorasani
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  A World-Wide Web radiology teaching file server on the Internet.

Authors:  M L Richardson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.959

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  How much interest is the Internet to patients?

Authors:  J Ross; C Chapman; C Murray; M Stevenson; D Natin; K Rogstad
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Patient understanding of diagnostic ultrasound examinations in an Australian private radiology clinic.

Authors:  Amy Starcevich; Paul Lombardo; Michal Schneider
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-11-29

3.  The internet--friend or foe? A questionnaire study of orthopaedic out-patients.

Authors:  C M Gupte; A N A Hassan; I D McDermott; R D Thomas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Characterization of Patient Interest in Provider-Based Consumer Health Information Technology: Survey Study.

Authors:  Joseph Featherall; Brittany Lapin; Alexander Chaitoff; Sonia A Havele; Nicolas Thompson; Irene Katzan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Three-Factor Structure of the eHealth Literacy Scale Among Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Outpatients: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

Authors:  Lisa L Hyde; Allison W Boyes; Tiffany-Jane Evans; Lisa J Mackenzie; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2018-02-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.