Literature DB >> 34761861

Selective Capture of Anti-N-glucosylated NTHi Adhesin Peptide Antibodies by a Multivalent Dextran Conjugate.

Antonio Mazzoleni1,2, Feliciana Real-Fernandez2, Francesca Nuti2, Roberta Lanzillo3, Vincenzo Brescia Morra3, Paolo Dambruoso4, Monica Bertoldo5, Paolo Rovero6, Jean-Maurice Mallet1, Anna Maria Papini2.   

Abstract

Tentacle-like polymers decorated with several copies of peptide antigens can be interesting tools for increasing the ability to capture circulating antibodies in patient sera, using cooperative effects for stronger avidity. We previously showed that antibodies from multiple sclerosis (MS) patient sera preferentially recognize hyperglucosylated adhesin protein HMW1ct of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi). We selected the C-terminal HMW1ct(1347-1354) minimal epitope and prepared the diglucosylated analogue Ac-KAN(Glc)VTLN(Glc)TTG-K(N3 )-NH2 to graft a 40 kDa dextran scaffold modified with glycidyl-propargyl moieties to perform a copper catalyzed alkyne-azide coupling reaction (CuAAC). Quantitative NMR measurements allowed the characterization of the peptide loading (19.5 %) on the multivalent dextran conjugate. This novel polymeric structure displayed optimal capturing properties of both IgG and, more interestingly, IgM antibodies in MS sera. Specific antibodies from a representative MS serum, were successfully depleted using a Sepharose resin bearing the new glucosylated multivalent conjugate, as confirmed by ELISA. These results may offer a promising proof-of-concept for the selective purification of high affinity autoantibodies from sera of autoimmune patients, in general, and of specific high affinity antibodies against a minimally glcosylated epitope Asn(Glc) from sera of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, in particular.
© 2021 The Authors. ChemBioChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ELISA; antibody caption; dextran conjugates; multivalence; peptides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34761861      PMCID: PMC9300045          DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202100515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chembiochem        ISSN: 1439-4227            Impact factor:   3.461


Introduction

Peptides mimicking relevant epitopes, once conjugated to tentacle‐like polymer scaffolds, can benefit of synergistic physicochemical multivalent interactions favoring antibody recognition. Therefore, suitable polymers grafted with peptide epitopes constitute a promising class of soft materials potentially useful for a multitude of innovative and elegant applications.[ , ] Historically, polymeric scaffolds based on carbohydrate epitopes have been used as immunosorbents, acting as “autoantibody scavengers” to remove pathogenic antibodies, particularly IgMs, from patient sera.[ , , ] Various grafting strategies enable control of the overall architecture of the final grafted polymer, integrating precise chemical structures with diverse functionalities, yielding novel synthetic polymeric multivalent conjugates. The stability and processability of these bioinspired polymers enable their use as surrogates of the mimicked molecules, featuring similar functions and occasionally exceeding the performance because of multivalent presentation. The era of “click”‐type chemistries,[ , ] i. e., copper catalyzed alkyne‐azide coupling reaction (CuAAC), oxime, Staudinger ligation, thiol‐ene, Glaser reaction, and many more bioorthogonal and biomimetic coupling reactions, promoted the access to complex and well‐defined peptide‐polymer conjugates. Exploitation of peptides and in particular glycopeptides reproducing antigens recognizing antibodies, holds the great potential to answer many unsolved questions in chemical immunology. In fact, thanks to the ability of peptides to mimic specific portions of protein antigens, several examples of “peptide mimics” have been used as synthetic immunological probes. In this perspective, the development of synthetic probes interacting with high affinity specific autoantibodies, biomarkers of autoimmune diseases, can contribute to set up diagnostic/prognostic peptide‐based immunoassays particularly useful to guide therapeutic treatments. Moreover, microarchitectures displaying peptide antigens as multivalent antibody ligands at high density can act as molecular “baits” to fish out specific autoantibodies from patient sera. Therefore, multivalent peptide conjugates can be efficient stationary phases for specific immunoaffinity columns to deplete specific autoimmune antibodies from sera. Branched polymers with a predefined structure are usually based on repetitive addition of glycopeptides to a central core molecule. Therefore, this backbone can be exploited as scaffold to produce tentacle‐like three‐dimensional structures (3D) presenting linear peptide antigens in a multivalent fashion. These conjugated structures reproduce “natural” peptide antigen presentation, thus increasing antibody recognition for IgM antibodies. In fact, while IgG‐type antibodies can be conveniently purified by affinity chromatography, IgM purification still presents unsolved problems, mostly due to IgMs pentameric spatial orientation. To the best of our knowledge, no specific peptide ligands able to capture IgMs from autoimmune patient sera have been described, particularly when both IgG‐ and IgM‐isotype antibodies are present. This is possibly because of the highest affinity of IgGs for antigens. This issue could be overcome exploiting IgMs higher avidity thanks to their pentameric structure. Consequently, the development of a tentacle‐like structure presenting peptide antigens able to recognize circulating antibodies in sera may constitute a promising strategy to face the unmet need of diagnostic and prognostic tools, and for autoantibody removal in most of the immune‐mediated diseases. Additionally, the quantification of IgMs can improve the stratification of patients in an early stage of the disease, hypothesizing to be reminiscent of bacterial infection triggering an immune response before the onset of the disease. Novel materials, exposing multiple copies of peptide antigens in a suitable 3D orientation, will be propaedeutic to develop selective apheresis techniques to deplete pathogenic antibodies in patients affected by autoimmune diseases. In this context, we previously developed a synthetic multiple antigenic peptide, carrying the minimal glucosylated epitope Asn(Glc) anchored to a 19‐atoms PEG‐based spacer, as probe to reveal specific and high affinity anti‐Asn(Glc) antibodies in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Since the simple Asn(Glc) moiety is not represented in the human glycoproteome repertoire, we turned our attention to bacteria, in particular to non‐typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi), which was reported to express cell‐surface adhesins including N‐Glc, to establish a connection between NTHi infection and MS. In fact, we found that antibodies to anti‐hyperglucosylated NTHi adhesin protein HMW1ct(N‐Glc) (bearing multiple glucosylated epitopes on asparagine residues) were present in a subpopulation of MS patients. This was the first insight that a native multivalent Asn‐glucosylated bacterial antigen was involved in MS. As a result of this ground‐breaking finding, we aimed to develop a novel peptide‐based dextran conjugate derived from NTHi HMW1ct(N‐Glc) to detect and possibly to capture antibodies in patient sera. To fulfill this goal, the dendrimer scaffold should meet some essential requirements. Dextran is a high molecular weight, inert, water‐soluble polymer that has been widely used in a variety of biomedical applications.[ , , , ] It is mainly constituted of linear α(1‐6)linked glucopyranosides with minor amount of α(1‐3) linkages accounting for dextran branching. Therefore, the remaining free hydroxyl functions can be easily functionalized to bind peptide epitopes by either direct attachment or through a linker. The synthetic strategy for the construction of dextran‐based tentacles requires three steps: 1) functionalization of the polymer with moieties able to yield a selective bioorthogonal reaction; 2) functionalization of the relevant peptide epitopes with a complementary reactive partner motif; 3) coupling reaction between the two components. We report herein a general and efficient method to produce a tentacle‐like dextran‐based polymer functionalized with NTHi glucopeptides, showing high affinity toward anti‐Asn(Glc) antibodies, taking advantage of avidity effect. In particular, we describe the synthesis and characterization of a peptide antigen‐based dendrimer containing capturing‐tentacles and its antibody (IgM and IgG) binding capacity and capturing properties.

Results and Discussion

Epitope selection

We previously demonstrated that N‐Glc containing epitopes in non‐typeable Haemophilus influenzae adhesin C‐terminal portion HMW1ct(1205–1526) are essential for high‐affinity antibody binding in a subpopulation of MS patients. With the aim of developing shorter peptide probes maintaining binding to these antibodies, we developed and tested differently glucosylated peptide analogs of the minimal fragment HMW1ct(1347–1354). In particular, we showed that the di‐N‐glucosylated adhesin peptide Ac‐KAN(Glc)VTLN(Glc)TT‐NH2 is able to inhibit high‐avidity binding of IgM antibodies to the parent glucosylated bacterial adhesin. This peptide contains two spatially close N‐glucosylation sites and an additional lysine residue at the N‐terminus (Table 1, Peptide 1). We also synthesized three glucosylated analogs bearing: i) N‐Glc moiety linked to Asn1348 (Table 1, Peptide 1’A) ii) N‐Glc moiety linked to Asn1352 (Table 1, Peptide 1’B), and iii) two N‐Glc moieties, on both glucosylation sites (Table 1, Peptide 1’A,B). Moreover, we modified Peptide 1’A,B elongating the sequence at C‐terminus with GK(N3) to obtain the Peptide 1′A,BGK(ϵN3) (Ac‐KAN(Glc)VTLN(Glc)TTGK(N3)‐NH2), containing an azide moiety to allow grafting to an alkyne functionalized dextran backbone by a selective bioorthogonal copper catalyzed alkyne‐azide coupling reaction (CuAAC). We extended the sequence of Peptide 1′A,B with G1355 to obtain a short spacer between the glucosylated sites and the grafting moiety. All peptides were synthesized in solid‐phase by a microwave‐assisted Fmoc/tBu strategy.
Table 1

Peptide sequences.

Sequence

Short name

ANVTLNTT

HMW1ct(1347–1354)

Ac‐KANVTLNTT‐NH2

[Ac‐Lys1346]HMW1ct(1346–1354)‐NH2

Peptide 1

Ac‐KAN(Glc)VTLNTT‐NH2

[Ac‐Lys1346;Asn(Glc)1348]HMW1ct(1346–1354)‐NH2

Peptide 1’A

Ac‐KANVTLN(Glc)TT‐NH2

[Ac‐Lys1346;Asn(Glc)1352]HMW1(1346–1354)‐NH2

Peptide 1’B

Ac‐KAN(Glc)VTLN(Glc)TT‐NH2

[Ac‐Lys1346; Asn(Glc)1348;Asn(Glc)1352]HMW1ct(1346–1354)‐NH2

Peptide 1’A,B

Ac‐KAN(Glc)VTLN(Glc)TTG‐K(N3)‐NH2

[Ac‐Lys1346;Asn(Glc)1348;Asn(Glc)1352;Lys(N3)1356]HMW1ct(1346–1356)‐NH2

Peptide 1′A,BGK(ϵN3)

Peptide sequences. Sequence Short name ANVTLNTT HMW1ct(1347–1354) Ac‐KANVTLNTT‐NH2 [Ac‐Lys1346]HMW1ct(1346–1354)‐NH2 Peptide 1 Ac‐KAN(Glc)VTLNTT‐NH2 [Ac‐Lys1346;Asn(Glc)1348]HMW1ct(1346–1354)‐NH2 Peptide 1’A Ac‐KANVTLN(Glc)TT‐NH2 [Ac‐Lys1346;Asn(Glc)1352]HMW1(1346–1354)‐NH2 Peptide 1’B Ac‐KAN(Glc)VTLN(Glc)TT‐NH2 [Ac‐Lys1346; Asn(Glc)1348;Asn(Glc)1352]HMW1ct(1346–1354)‐NH2 Peptide 1’A,B Ac‐KAN(Glc)VTLN(Glc)TTG‐K(N3)‐NH2 [Ac‐Lys1346;Asn(Glc)1348;Asn(Glc)1352;Lys(N3)1356]HMW1ct(1346–1356)‐NH2 Peptide 1′A,BGK(ϵN3)

Dextran functionalization

Dextran is a versatile biopolymeric scaffold that can be functionalized with several reactive moieties to link different types of biologically active cargoes, i. e., peptides, proteins, cyclodextrins, and small molecules.[ , , ] Dextran is composed of α‐1,6 glucose units. This bond (with the primary alcohol of glucose) gives great flexibility to the polysaccharide chain even in large molecules. This particular characteristic induces unstructured conformation and gives impressive solubility in water, compared to polysaccharides of the same size but other linkages. Dextran is therefore well suited to act as an active cargo. In particular, 40 KDa dextran has an average degree of polymerization of 250 (40000/162) and taking into account 4.6 Å per glucosyl moiety (C1–O6 distance), the maximum length range is approximately 1150 Å. This length can be considered large enough to cover many/all IgM paratopes. We selected the CuAAC reaction to generate in the biopolymer a multivalent presentation of N‐Glc moieties, fundamental for antibody binding in Multiple Sclerosis. In particular, the azide‐containing diglucosylated Peptide 1’N3 was grafted to the glycidyl‐propargyl functionalized dextran (Dex40‐GP). Dex40‐GP was obtained by functionalization with alkynyl moieties by an epoxide opening reaction of glycidyl propargyl ether (GPE) in aqueous basic solution, according to a previously described procedure. The glycidyl linker provides a suitable distance between the grafted peptides and dextran without affecting solubility. Moreover, the ether bond is hydrolytically stable. Basic water solution is used as a solvent to avoid homopolymerization of GPE, which is used in excess to overcome a competing hydrolysis. Approximating dextran as a linear polymer composed of α‐1,6 linked glucose units, GPE is possibly reacting with one out of the three free hydroxyl functions (O2, O3, O4). The precise hydroxyl function involved in the new ether bond formation is the object of an open debate.[ , , ] The less hindered position is O3, however the H1 chemical shift of the newly modified units likely corresponds to O2/O4 functionalized glucose. The hydroxyl at position 2 of the glucose unit is generally shown to be the most substituted in these conditions. It is the most acidic, and thus more deprotonated by sodium hydroxide and more alkylated. Nevertheless, for simplicity's sake, the modified dextran is always represented as a homogeneously O2‐modified construct (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1

Functionalization of 40 kDa dextran with glycidyl‐propargyl moieties.

Functionalization of 40 kDa dextran with glycidyl‐propargyl moieties. The degree of substitution (DS) on the hydroxyl groups of dextran was calculated by q1H‐NMR analysis. The percentage of propargyl moieties per glucose unit in dextran were calculated as the integral ratio of alkyne proton (2.98 ppm) and anomeric protons (5.60‐4.95 ppm range) resulting 29 % (see Supporting Information for details). The DS of the modified dextran units is 0.31, calculated as ratio of the new H1 signals of modified glucoses and total anomeric protons area. Moreover, the area of the signal at 4.29 ppm (methylene protons of propargyl group) and the total area of peaks between 4.15–3.35 ppm are both higher than expected (Figure 1). This unreported outcome was ascribed to the minor presence of GPE oligomers and alkyne‐alkyne coupling (Scheme S1 in the Supporting Information). The average oligomerization degree, calculated by the ratio between the signal at 4.28 ppm due to the CH2 of all propargyl moieties and the signal of the anomeric protons of the functionalized glucose units in dextran was 1.8. According to our calculations, out of the 246.9 glucose units in each dextran molecules, 170.4 units remain as simple α‐1.6 glucoses (MW=162 Da) and 76.5 units are α‐1,6 glucoses modified with 1.8 GP groups (MW=366 Da) each on average. Among these, 71.6 terminal alkyne protons are present. In conclusion, the estimated molecular weight of Dex40‐GP is 55.2 kDa (see Supporting Information, section 2.3.2).
Figure 1

1H‐NMR overlaid spectra of the commercially available 40 kDa dextran (blue spectrum) and GPE functionalized Dex40‐GP (red spectrum): new signals appearance that were assigned to the corresponding protons of the GP‐functionalized glucose units are indicated by colored circles.

1H‐NMR overlaid spectra of the commercially available 40 kDa dextran (blue spectrum) and GPE functionalized Dex40‐GP (red spectrum): new signals appearance that were assigned to the corresponding protons of the GP‐functionalized glucose units are indicated by colored circles.

Conjugation of Dex40‐GP to Peptide 1’N3

Peptide 1′A,BGK(ϵN3) was used for conjugation to Dex40‐GP by CuAAC in a DMSO/water mixture (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2

CuAAC promoted reaction between the diglucosylated peptide 1′A,BGK(ϵN3) and Dex40‐GP, leading to the multivalent peptide‐dextran conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1.

CuAAC promoted reaction between the diglucosylated peptide 1′A,BGK(ϵN3) and Dex40‐GP, leading to the multivalent peptide‐dextran conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1. After a thorough work‐up for copper removal, the obtained Dex40‐Peptide 1’ was characterized by NMR spectroscopy. To facilitate peaks assignment and spectra interpretation, 1H and 13C‐NMR of peptide 1′A,BGK(ϵN3) were also recorded (see Experimental Section for further information). The characteristic peak at 8.10 ppm in the 1H‐NMR spectrum of Dex40‐Peptide 1’ provides clear evidence of the presence of 1,4‐disubstituted 1,2,3‐triazole ring as amide bond surrogate, linking Dex40 to Peptide 1’ (Figure 2). The integral value of the proton signal (8.10 ppm) of the formed triazolyl moiety is in the expected ratio with other isolated signals originating from Peptide 1′A,BGK(ϵN3) protons, such as Hβ of valine (2.18 ppm), methyl protons of the N‐terminal acetamide, as well as characteristic signals of threonine, leucine, and valine residues thus indicating that the intact peptide is covalently linked to the dextran backbone (Figure 2). This evidence is important to prove that no peptide in the sample is simply absorbed by the polymer.
Figure 2

1H‐NMR of Dex40‐Peptide 1’. Signals and areas assignments characterizing the novel multivalent peptide‐dextran conjugate are reported in colored circles.

1H‐NMR of Dex40‐Peptide 1’. Signals and areas assignments characterizing the novel multivalent peptide‐dextran conjugate are reported in colored circles. Peptide 1 linking through triazole bridges is also evidenced by the shift of Hϵ signal of Lys(N3) from 3.35 ppm to 1.98 ppm. Instead, the signal due to methylene protons of propargyl group (4.29 ppm) decreases in intensity without disappearing, while the new signal of triazole‐linked methylene appears at 4.50 ppm. Terminal alkynes signal (2.98 ppm) also decreases without disappearing completely, as expected (see the Experimental Section for further information). Most importantly, using the isolated triazole proton as reference signal, the degree of substitution of dextran in peptide molecules was calculated by comparing it with integrals of relevant peaks/ranges, such as H1 proton of modified dextran units. The peptide loading in dextran was calculated to be ∼0.20 peptide mol/glucoside units, meaning that 31 % mol of terminal alkynes initially present on dextran remain unreacted (residual alkynes on dextran DS=0.1) and can be exploited for future applications (see Experimental Section for further information). According to these considerations, each molecule of Dex40‐Peptide 1’ carries on average 48 peptide branches and thus it has a final estimated MW of ≈129 kDa (Table 2).
Table 2

Estimated molecular weights (MW) and units of compounds DEX40, DEX40‐GP, and DEX40‐Peptide 1’.

Compound

Estimated MW

Estimated units

DEX40

40 KDa

247 α‐1,6‐Glc units/molecule

DEX40‐GP

55 KDa

170 unmodified α‐1,6‐Glc units/molecule 77 GP‐linked α‐1,6‐Glc units/molecule (31 %) 1.8 GP groups/unit 72 terminal reactive alkyne groups/molecule (29 %)

Dex40‐Peptide 1’

139 KDa

170 unmodified α‐1,6‐Glc units/molecule 24 reactive alkynes/molecule (9.5 %) 48 peptides/molecule (19.5 %)

Estimated molecular weights (MW) and units of compounds DEX40, DEX40‐GP, and DEX40‐Peptide 1’. Compound Estimated MW Estimated units DEX40 40 KDa 247 α‐1,6‐Glc units/molecule DEX40‐GP 55 KDa 170 unmodified α‐1,6‐Glc units/molecule 77 GP‐linked α‐1,6‐Glc units/molecule (31 %) 1.8 GP groups/unit 72 terminal reactive alkyne groups/molecule (29 %) Dex40‐Peptide 1’ 139 KDa 170 unmodified α‐1,6‐Glc units/molecule 24 reactive alkynes/molecule (9.5 %) 48 peptides/molecule (19.5 %) The estimated glucose/peptide ratio of 5/1 lead to a calculated distance between antigens (in an idealized extended dextran with regular antigen space) of 23 Å (4.6×5). Although not easy to go further in conjugate characterization, we expect a good complementarity of both macromolecules. Since the distance of paratopes is ca 120 Å in one monomeric immunoglobulin molecule, these conjugates are thus potentially able to link several paratopes at the same time, acting as tentacles able to trap antibodies (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Schematic representation of the novel conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1’, carrying HMW1ct(1347–1354) diglucosylated epitopes shared by Peptide 1’A,B. On the right, main features of dextran and dextran derivatives, based on NMR characterization, are summarized.

Schematic representation of the novel conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1’, carrying HMW1ct(1347–1354) diglucosylated epitopes shared by Peptide 1’A,B. On the right, main features of dextran and dextran derivatives, based on NMR characterization, are summarized.

Application of multivalent peptide‐dextran conjugate to antibody detection and capture

To assess the ability of the novel peptide‐dextran conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1’ to identify anti‐hyperglucosylated adhesin antibodies in MS patient sera, we performed competitive ELISA experiments. To this purpose, five representative patient sera were selected based on their anti‐HMW1ct(N‐Glc) antibody titers. MS1 and MS2 sample sera presented high IgG and low IgM titer. Conversely, MS4 and MS5 sample sera showed lower IgG titer compared to IgM one. Finally, MS6 sample serum was selected because of its high titer of both IgG and IgM antibodies.

Competitive ELISA

The aim of this experiment was to compare the affinities of IgG and IgM antibodies to the new multivalent peptide‐dextran conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1’ with those toward the parent hyperglucosylated adhesin protein. Therefore we performed competitive ELISA using HMW1ct(N‐Glc) as coating antigen and measuring the ability of Dex40‐Peptide 1’, added in solution, to inhibit IgG and IgM binding to the coated antigen. In addition, we also tested the starting materials based on dextran, Dex40, its alkyne‐functionalized analogue, Dex40‐GP, and, only for IgM, Peptide 1’AB and unglucosylated adhesin, HMW1ct. The results, showed in Figure 4, clearly indicate that anti‐HMW1ct(N‐Glc) antibody affinity toward Dex40‐Peptide 1’ is higher than that toward the hyperglucosylated protein. In particular, the multivalent peptide‐dextran conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1’ displayed an IC50 1.56 and 1.96 log units lower for IgGs and IgMs, respectively (Table 3). At variance, the starting polymer, Dex40, and its alkyne‐functionalized analogue, Dex40‐GP, do not compete for antibody binding. Therefore, antibody recognition can be ascribed only to the presence of Peptide 1’ linked to Dex40.
Figure 4

Competitive ELISA obtained coating the hyperglucosylated protein antigen HMW1ct(N‐Glc). Inhibition curves of anti‐HMW1ct(N‐Glc) IgG (A) and IgM (B) antibodies using Dex40, its alkyne‐functionalized analogue Dex40‐GP, and the novel peptide‐dextran conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1’. Results show the inhibition activity % (ordinate axis) of a representative serum MS1 for IgG (A) and of a representative serum MS4 for IgM (B) vs antigen concentrations on a logarithmic scale (abscissas axis).

Table 3

Calculated pIC50 values of anti‐HMW1ct(N‐Glc) IgG and IgM antibodies to HMW1ct(N‐Glc) and Dex40‐Peptide 1’. Values are reported as 95 % confidence interval for the calculated mean pIC50±the standard error (SEM) in representative sera MS1 (IgG) and MS4 (IgM).

Antigen

pIC50 (IgG)

pIC50 (IgM)

HMW1ct(Glc)

8.14±0.45

7.07±0.72

Dex40‐Peptide 1’

9.70±0.21

9.03±0.39

Competitive ELISA obtained coating the hyperglucosylated protein antigen HMW1ct(N‐Glc). Inhibition curves of anti‐HMW1ct(N‐Glc) IgG (A) and IgM (B) antibodies using Dex40, its alkyne‐functionalized analogue Dex40‐GP, and the novel peptide‐dextran conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1’. Results show the inhibition activity % (ordinate axis) of a representative serum MS1 for IgG (A) and of a representative serum MS4 for IgM (B) vs antigen concentrations on a logarithmic scale (abscissas axis). Calculated pIC50 values of anti‐HMW1ct(N‐Glc) IgG and IgM antibodies to HMW1ct(N‐Glc) and Dex40‐Peptide 1’. Values are reported as 95 % confidence interval for the calculated mean pIC50±the standard error (SEM) in representative sera MS1 (IgG) and MS4 (IgM). Antigen pIC50 (IgG) pIC50 (IgM) HMW1ct(Glc) 8.14±0.45 7.07±0.72 Dex40‐Peptide 1’ 9.70±0.21 9.03±0.39 This is the first insight that a tentacle‐like macromolecule decorated with multiple copies of the selected N‐glucosylated antigen Peptide 1’ is able to bind anti‐bacterial hyperglucosylated adhesin IgGs and, most importantly, IgMs from MS patient sera. Particularly in the case of IgMs, the differences in IC50 can be ascribed to an increased avidity because of a multivalent effect (Table 3). This hypothesis is strongly supported by the observation that the diglucosylated Peptide 1’ , containing the same epitope, lacks multivalent presentation of N‐glucosyl moieties. It is worth to note that Peptide 1’ is able to compete with a structure‐based designed monovalent antigenic probe, but not to inhibit anti‐HMW1ct(N‐Glc) IgM antibodies (Figure 4, panel B).

Solid‐phase ELISA

Antibody detection in patient sera using the tentacle‐like polymer Dex40‐Peptide 1’ has also been evaluated in solid‐phase ELISA (SP‐ELISA). At this purpose, preliminary tests were carried out to set‐up the optimal conditions for an SP‐ELISA screening of a larger collection of sera. Dex40‐Peptide 1’ coated on polystyrene ELISA plate efficiently detected both IgG and IgM antibodies. Since we have never observed a linear correlation between the antigen concentration in the coating solution and the observed signal, we coated both the peptide‐dextran conjugate and the glucopeptide at the same formal concentration. In the case of IgGs (Figure 5, panel A), similar antibody titers are observed using as coating antigen either the polymer or the diglucosylated Peptide 1’A,B. These data indicate that when the polymer is coated on the plate to detect IgGs, the multivalency is not an added value. In fact, the peptide‐bearing polymer and the free peptide behave similarly as coating antigens. At variance, when measuring IgMs in the three representative sera in which the IgM isotype is relevant, i. e., MS3, MS4, and MS5, Dex40‐Peptide 1’ was able to identify higher IgM antibody titers, as compared to the free glucopeptide (Figure 5, panel B). Therefore, IgM antibody identification significantly benefits of the tentacle‐like structure of Dex40‐Peptide 1, presenting multiple copies of Peptide 1’A,B. This result is in agreement with our previous observation that short N‐glucosylated sequences were able to detect IgG‐type antibodies, but clearly displayed a drop in IgM antibody recognition.
Figure 5

SP‐ELISA to detect IgG (A) and IgM (B) antibody titers in 5 representative Multiple Sclerosis sera samples using the diglucosylated Peptide 1’AB (red) and Dex40‐Peptide 1’ (blue) as antigens. Mean absorbance values were evaluated at 405 nm; standard deviation (SD) for n=3 independent measures evaluated at the same conditions are reported as error bars.

SP‐ELISA to detect IgG (A) and IgM (B) antibody titers in 5 representative Multiple Sclerosis sera samples using the diglucosylated Peptide 1’AB (red) and Dex40‐Peptide 1’ (blue) as antigens. Mean absorbance values were evaluated at 405 nm; standard deviation (SD) for n=3 independent measures evaluated at the same conditions are reported as error bars.

Antibody purification

The novel tentacle‐like antigen Dex40‐Peptide 1’ was therefore tested in a proof‐of‐concept experiment of specific antibody purification from MS sample sera. Firstly, we immobilized Dex40‐Peptide 1’ onto CNBr‐preactivated Sepharose resin beads, in order to set up the stationary phase for an immunoaffinity‐based column. In this conjugation step, the amine functions on side‐chain lysine residues react with the activated cyanate active ester on the Sepharose resin forming a stable isourea derivative. A solution of Dex40‐Peptide 1’ (1 mg/mL) was incubated with 100 mg of Sepharose resin beads in the coupling buffer (NaHCO3 0.1 M, NaCl 0.5 M at pH 8.3). Each diglucosylated peptide sequence (Ac‐KAN(Glc)VTLN(Glc)TT) grafted onto the dextran biopolymeric scaffold (bearing a total of 48 peptides according to the NMR analysis, Figure 2), contains an N‐terminal lysine residue. Therefore, ca. 0.4 μmol of primary amine function/mg of tentacle are available to link to Sepharose. Immobilization was verified by comparing UV spectra of the initial solution of Dex40‐Peptide 1’ with the eluted solution after incubation. Although analysis of the Dex40‐Peptide 1’ initial solution before coupling did not display a clear maximum intensity peak, the absorbance resulting after coupling dropped to zero. This allowed us to consider that the reaction was completed. Unreacted cyanate sites were blocked with a glycine solution and functionalized Sepharose beads were extensively washed and equilibrated. Diluted serum sample MS5 (FT1), selected for its high IgM antibody titer, was flowed through the functionalized Sepharose. Then, final flow‐through was collected (FT2). Retained antibodies were finally eluted from the column using acidic glycine solution (pH=2.3), which was immediately neutralized after elution, by addition of NaHCO3 buffer. The eluted solution containing the purified antibodies was exchanged with PBS and isotype antibody titer was evaluated by SP‐ELISA (Figure 6).
Figure 6

SP‐ELISA to detect IgG and IgM antibody titers after immunoaffinity purification of representative MS5 sample serum, on Sepharose column functionalized with Dex40‐Peptide 1’. The multivalent peptide‐dextran conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1’ was coated on the ELISA plate. Mean absorbances (±standard deviation for n=3 independent experiments) of IgG and IgM antibodies of the different fractions are plotted. MS5 (sample serum), FT1 (diluted sample serum), and FT2 (final flow‐through) were tested using same dilution ratio. Eluted antibodies were approximately 5 times more concentrated.

SP‐ELISA to detect IgG and IgM antibody titers after immunoaffinity purification of representative MS5 sample serum, on Sepharose column functionalized with Dex40‐Peptide 1’. The multivalent peptide‐dextran conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1’ was coated on the ELISA plate. Mean absorbances (±standard deviation for n=3 independent experiments) of IgG and IgM antibodies of the different fractions are plotted. MS5 (sample serum), FT1 (diluted sample serum), and FT2 (final flow‐through) were tested using same dilution ratio. Eluted antibodies were approximately 5 times more concentrated. Results showed that FT2 fractions displayed a remarkable decrease in antibody titer indicating that both IgG and IgM‐type antibodies were almost completely depleted. The slight decrease in IgM antibody titer in the eluted antibody fraction compared to the original titer in the initial MS5 sample serum, can be ascribed to lower stability of pentameric IgMs in the acidic conditions of the eluent that is required for eluting the antibodies from the Sepharose matrix. Moreover, residual IgMs have possibly remained strongly linked to Sepharose, because of the high affinity binding of IgMs to Dex40‐Peptide 1’. However, our results demonstrate that specific MS antibodies to bacterial diglucosylated adhesin peptide of non‐typeable Haemophilus influenzae, particularly of the IgM isotype, can be selectively captured by an immunoaffinity procedure based on the novel multivalent dextran conjugate Dex40‐Peptide 1’, bearing multiple copies of the relevant bacterial peptide epitope.

Conclusion

We reported here the synthesis and characterization of a new dextran‐peptide conjugate that holds great potential for future theragnostic and prognostic applications. The assembly of multiple N‐glucosylated peptide moieties grafted to a polymer backbone is crucial for the detection and capture of IgG and, most importantly, IgM antibodies in sera of MS patients. Peptide 1′A,BGK(ϵN3), containing the diglucosylated HMW1ct(1347–1354) epitope, was grafted onto an alkyne‐modified dextran by CuAAC promoted coupling (click chemistry). Quantitative NMR characterization allowed to measure the peptide loading of the polymer as 48 branches /mol per dextran chain. This novel grafted polymeric structure was shown to dramatically increase the binding capacity of IgGs and IgMs in MS sera. The effect of cooperativity resulted in an increase in antigenicity when compared to the free epitope by competitive ELISA tests. The natural evolution of this project points toward the exploitation of this synthetic polymer for the isolation and characterization of antibodies. In fact, a representative MS serum was successfully depleted from IgG and IgM antibodies that recognize diglycosylated HMW1ct antigen conjugated to a Sepharose column, as confirmed by SP‐ELISA. This preliminary achievement is a proof‐of‐concept of the selective capture of circulating autoantibodies that could hopefully lead to the development of a specific apheresis‐based device. Moreover, these results pave the way for future elaborations involving the production and characterization of new conjugates with different peptide loading (i. e., the degree of substitution) and polymer size (i. e., dextran molecular weight). Finally, it is important to note that CuAAC reaction between Peptide 1′A,BGK(ϵN3) and Dex40‐GP was intentionally driven to preserve a minor percentage of unreacted alkynes that could be useful for future applications. The use of 0.8 eq of azide (i. e., peptide)/alkyne group, results of Dex40‐Peptide 1’ containing 19.5 peptide chains and 9.5 terminal alkynes/molecule. Each peptide sequence contains a N‐terminal lysine carrying a primary ϵ‐amino function useful for bioconjugation purposes. In our preliminary attempts, we exploited the primary amine groups for the immobilization of Dex40‐Peptide 1’ to CNBr‐activated Sepharose beads. This approach allowed us to verify the efficacy of our conjugate for antibody removal from a patient serum sample. However, the reactivity of alkyne‐terminal groups is not restricted to the development of stationary phases for immunoaffinity purification. Several bioconjugation strategies can take advantage of the orthogonality between the alkyne and the amino groups. Indeed, the reaction with other molecules could in principle provide multifunctional architectures. For example, we can envisage the use of lipids for immunostimulation, thiol containing molecules for gold nanoparticle‐based delivery or gold surface functionalization in sensor chips,[ , ] as well as biotin, maleimide and many other functionally reactive derivatives that can be exploited for the detection and characterization of anti‐N(Glc) antibodies. In summary, Dex40‐Peptide 1’, containing unreacted alkynes and the primary ϵ‐amino function on the N‐terminal lysyl residue in the conjugated Peptide 1′A,B, is the relevant component of a technology platform that may enable the construction of more elaborate molecular systems amenable to new and exciting applications in chemical immunology.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supporting Information Click here for additional data file.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Gold nanoparticles in delivery applications.

Authors:  Partha Ghosh; Gang Han; Mrinmoy De; Chae Kyu Kim; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Facile synthesis of beta-cyclodextrin-dextran polymers by "click" chemistry.

Authors:  Thorbjørn Terndrup Nielsen; Véronique Wintgens; Catherine Amiel; Reinhard Wimmer; Kim Lambertsen Larsen
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  Selective in vivo removal of pathogenic anti-MAG autoantibodies, an antigen-specific treatment option for anti-MAG neuropathy.

Authors:  Ruben Herrendorff; Pascal Hänggi; Hélène Pfister; Fan Yang; Delphine Demeestere; Fabienne Hunziker; Samuel Frey; Nicole Schaeren-Wiemers; Andreas J Steck; Beat Ernst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Synthesis of the t [beta-D-Gal-(1 goes to 3)-alpha-D-GalNAc]-antigenic determinant in a form useful for the preparation of an effective artificial antigen and the corresponding immunoadsorbent.

Authors:  R M Ratcliffe; D A Baker; R U Lemieux
Journal:  Carbohydr Res       Date:  1981-06-16       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 5.  Growing applications of "click chemistry" for bioconjugation in contemporary biomedical research.

Authors:  Kido Nwe; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.099

Review 6.  Peptide/protein-polymer conjugates: synthetic strategies and design concepts.

Authors:  Marc A Gauthier; Harm-Anton Klok
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Hyperglucosylated adhesin-derived peptides as antigenic probes in multiple sclerosis: Structure optimization and immunological evaluation.

Authors:  Antonio Mazzoleni; Feliciana Real-Fernandez; Maud Larregola; Francesca Nuti; Olivier Lequin; Anna Maria Papini; Jean-Maurice Mallet; Paolo Rovero
Journal:  J Pept Sci       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 1.905

8.  Label-free method for anti-glucopeptide antibody detection in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Feliciana Real-Fernández; Giada Rossi; Francesco Lolli; Anna Maria Papini; Paolo Rovero
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2015-03-12

9.  Fine Mapping of Glutamate Decarboxylase 65 Epitopes Reveals Dependency on Hydrophobic Amino Acids for Specific Interactions.

Authors:  Niccolò Valdarnini; Bettina Holm; Paul Hansen; Paolo Rovero; Gunnar Houen; Nicole Trier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  2 in total

1.  Role of Helical Structure in MBP Immunodominant Peptides for Efficient IgM Antibody Recognition in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Staśkiewicz; Michael Quagliata; Feliciana Real-Fernandez; Francesca Nuti; Roberta Lanzillo; Vincenzo Brescia-Morra; Hendrik Rusche; Michal Jewginski; Alfonso Carotenuto; Diego Brancaccio; Rina Aharoni; Ruth Arnon; Paolo Rovero; Rafal Latajka; Anna Maria Papini
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.545

2.  Selective Capture of Anti-N-glucosylated NTHi Adhesin Peptide Antibodies by a Multivalent Dextran Conjugate.

Authors:  Antonio Mazzoleni; Feliciana Real-Fernandez; Francesca Nuti; Roberta Lanzillo; Vincenzo Brescia Morra; Paolo Dambruoso; Monica Bertoldo; Paolo Rovero; Jean-Maurice Mallet; Anna Maria Papini
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.461

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.