Literature DB >> 34760547

Time to delivery based on sonographic assessment prior to forceps and vacuum.

Sana Usman1,2, Birgitte Kahrs3,4, Helen Barton1, Kjell Salvesen3,4, Torbjorn Moe Eggebo3,4, Christoph Lees1,2,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To compare the duration of vacuum and forceps delivery in relation to ultrasound assessment of fetal head position and station.
METHODS: A prospective single-centre cohort study in nulliparous women at term with prolonged second stage of labour. Fetal head position was determined using transabdominal ultrasound and station as head-perineum distance (HPD) from transperineal ultrasound prior to an instrument. The primary outcome was duration of vacuum and forceps to vaginal delivery and was analysed as survival expressed by hazard ratio (HR). Secondary outcomes were delivery mode and immediate neonatal outcome.
RESULTS: In the study population of 54 women, the primary instrument was vacuum for 36 and forceps for 18. Four women were delivered by Caesarean section. Estimated median duration for forceps deliveries was 5 min (95% CI 4.0-6.0) vs. 9 min (95% CI 7.3-10.6) for vacuum deliveries (P = 0.17; Log-rank test). The HR for vaginal delivery was 2.02 (95% CI 1.04-3.91, P = 0.038) after adjusting for HPD, maternal age and BMI. OP position had minor influence on the primary outcome (HR changed from 2.02 to 2.08). The first instrument failed in 11/31 (35.5%) where HPD > 35 mm vs. 2/21 (9.5%) where HPD ≤ 35 mm (P < 0.05). There were no cases of Apgar score <7 at 5 min or umbilical artery pH < 7.1.
CONCLUSION: In prolonged second stage, delivery with forceps was achieved more quickly than by vacuum when matched for ultrasound determined head station. Irrespective of which was the primary instrument, the failure rate was greater at higher head stations.
© 2019 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean delivery; labour; transabdominal ultrasound; transperineal ultrasound

Year:  2019        PMID: 34760547      PMCID: PMC8411762          DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 1836-6864


  20 in total

Review 1.  Indications for caesarean section.

Authors:  Z Penn; S Ghaem-Maghami
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.237

2.  Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position.

Authors:  S Akmal; E Tsoi; N Kametas; R Howard; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2002-09

Review 3.  Role of operative vaginal deliveries in prevention of cesarean deliveries.

Authors:  Adi Hirshberg; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the risk of subsequent premature birth.

Authors:  Stephen L Wood; Selphee Tang; Susan Crawford
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor.

Authors:  B Tutschek; E A Torkildsen; T M Eggebø
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Forceps delivery is associated with increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse and muscle trauma: a cross-sectional study 16-24 years after first delivery.

Authors:  I Volløyhaug; S Mørkved; Ø Salvesen; K Å Salvesen
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term.

Authors:  T M Eggebø; L K Gjessing; C Heien; E Smedvig; I Økland; P Romundstad; K A Salvesen
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Births: Final Data for 2015.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman; Anne K Driscoll; T J Mathews
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2017-01

Review 9.  Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.

Authors:  R B Johanson; B K Menon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

10.  Benefits and pitfalls of the use of intrapartum ultrasound.

Authors:  Sana Usman; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.