Literature DB >> 16565994

Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term.

T M Eggebø1, L K Gjessing, C Heien, E Smedvig, I Økland, P Romundstad, K A Salvesen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether engagement of the fetal head or cervical length in women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term, are associated with time from PROM to delivery or need for operative delivery.
METHODS: A transperineal ultrasound examination was performed in 152 women with a single live fetus in cephalic presentation after PROM (at > 37 gestational weeks). The shortest distance from the outer bony limit of the fetal skull to the skin surface of the perineum was measured in a transverse view, and the cervical length was measured in a sagittal view. The time from PROM to delivery was tested in a Cox regression analysis with ultrasound measurements, parity, maternal age, body mass index and birth weight as possible predictive factors.
RESULTS: The head-perineal distance was associated with the time from PROM to delivery (log rank test, P < 0.001). Thirty-six hours after PROM, 32% (95% CI, 15-49) of women with a short head-perineal distance (< 45 mm) and 43% (95% CI, 24-62) of women with a long distance (> or = 45 mm) were still in labor. Women with a short head-perineal distance had fewer Cesarean sections, less use of epidural analgesia and a shorter time in active labor, and their babies had a higher pH in the umbilical artery. The measured cervical length was not associated independently with time to delivery.
CONCLUSION: Transperineal ultrasound measurements of fetal head engagement may help clinicians to predict the course of labor in women with PROM. Copyright 2006 ISUOG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16565994     DOI: 10.1002/uog.2744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  11 in total

1.  Sonographic parameters for diagnosing fetal head engagement during labour.

Authors:  Yaw A Wiafe; Bill Whitehead; Heather Venables; Alexander T Odoi
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-02-07

2.  Transperineal ultrasound in routine uterine cervix measurement.

Authors:  David Krief; Arthur Foulon; Ambre Tondreau; Momar Diouf; Fabrice Sergent; Jean Gondry; Julien Chevreau
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Time to delivery based on sonographic assessment prior to forceps and vacuum.

Authors:  Sana Usman; Birgitte Kahrs; Helen Barton; Kjell Salvesen; Torbjorn Moe Eggebo; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-01-21

Review 4.  Intrapartum ultrasound: A useful method for evaluating labor progress and predicting operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Ki Hoon Ahn; Min-Jeong Oh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2014-11-20

5.  Pre-induction translabial ultrasound measurements in predicting mode of delivery compared to bishop score: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Soghra Khazardoost; Fahimeh Ghotbizadeh Vahdani; Sahar Latifi; Sedighe Borna; Maryam Tahani; Mohammad Ali Rezaei; Masoomeh Shafaat
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Benefits and pitfalls of the use of intrapartum ultrasound.

Authors:  Sana Usman; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

7.  The JNU-IFM dataset for segmenting pubic symphysis-fetal head.

Authors:  Yaosheng Lu; Mengqiang Zhou; Dengjiang Zhi; Minghong Zhou; Xiaosong Jiang; Ruiyu Qiu; Zhanhong Ou; Huijin Wang; Di Qiu; Mei Zhong; Xiaoxing Lu; Gaowen Chen; Jieyun Bai
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2022-02-02

8.  Using transperineal ultrasound to predict labor onset.

Authors:  Fanghua Peng; Yang Yu; Yanan Sun; Shan Jiang; Yun Han; Zhikun Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

9.  Automatic evaluation of progression angle and fetal head station through intrapartum echographic monitoring.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Ernesto Casciaro; Giulia Soloperto; Emanuele Perrone; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Antonio Perrone
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 10.  Three-dimensional/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: clinical utility and future prospects.

Authors:  Ginevra Salsi; Ilaria Cataneo; Gaia Dodaro; Nicola Rizzo; Gianluigi Pilu; Mar Sanz Gascón; Aly Youssef
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.