| Literature DB >> 34759324 |
Wei Chen1, Maaike Schilperoort2,3,4, Yihai Cao5, Jinjun Shi6, Ira Tabas7,8,9, Wei Tao10.
Abstract
Nanotechnology could improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and contribute to the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to further reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Macrophages have key roles in atherosclerosis progression and, therefore, macrophage-associated pathological processes are important targets for both diagnostic imaging and novel therapies for atherosclerosis. In this Review, we highlight efforts in the past two decades to develop imaging techniques and to therapeutically manipulate macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques with the use of rationally designed nanoparticles. We review the latest progress in nanoparticle-based imaging modalities that can specifically target macrophages. Using novel molecular imaging technology, these modalities enable the identification of advanced atherosclerotic plaques and the assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of medical interventions. Additionally, we provide novel perspectives on how macrophage-targeting nanoparticles can deliver a broad range of therapeutic payloads to atherosclerotic lesions. These nanoparticles can suppress pro-atherogenic macrophage processes, leading to improved resolution of inflammation and stabilization of plaques. Finally, we propose future opportunities for novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and provide solutions to challenges in this area for the purpose of accelerating the clinical translation of nanomedicine for the treatment of atherosclerotic vascular disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34759324 PMCID: PMC8580169 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-021-00629-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol ISSN: 1759-5002 Impact factor: 49.421
Fig. 1Role of macrophages in the progression and regression of atherosclerosis.
a | Atherosclerosis development is initiated by the retention and aggregation of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins (apoB-LPs) in the subendothelial space. ApoB-LPs activate endothelial cells, resulting in the upregulation of adhesion molecules (such as intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1)) that mediate monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells and migration into the arterial vessel wall. In the arterial intima, monocytes differentiate into macrophages, which engulf lipoprotein-derived cholesterol, leading to foam cell formation. Macrophages that cannot process the large amounts of cholesterol undergo cholesterol-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis. b | If circulating apoB-LP levels remain elevated and the pro-inflammatory state persists, monocyte infiltration and macrophage apoptosis continue, producing so-called ‘vulnerable’ atherosclerotic plaques with large necrotic cores and thin fibrous caps. Vulnerable plaques are prone to rupture, which can lead to thrombus formation, arterial occlusion and sudden cardiac death. c | However, if the plasma cholesterol level is sufficiently lowered and/or the pro-inflammatory state subsides and resolution processes are activated, atherosclerosis regression is possible. Regressing atherosclerotic lesions are characterized by a high cholesterol efflux from macrophages to HDL, large numbers of pro-resolving macrophages that clear apoptotic cells through efferocytosis, reduced plaque necrosis and a thick protective fibrous cap. Regressing atherosclerotic plaques are relatively stable and less likely to rupture than vulnerable plaques and, most importantly, are associated with a lower risk of coronary artery disease in humans.
Fig. 2Macrophage-targeted nanoplatforms and non-invasive diagnostic imaging of atherosclerosis.
Non-invasive bioimaging technologies facilitate the visualization of high-risk atherosclerotic plaques with high spatiotemporal resolution. a | The unique epitopes expressed on the macrophage surface can be recognized with the use of targeted nanoparticle-based imaging agents. Targeted nanoparticles have been designed to improve the delivery of imaging agents to inflammatory macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques, thereby improving imaging contrast. b | Various non-invasive bioimaging modalities, advantages, disadvantages and the associated nanoparticle-based imaging contrast agents for plaque visualization. The arrows and arrowheads show areas of high agent uptake. Nanoparticle-facilitated non-invasive bioimaging can provide insights into atherosclerotic plaque biology as well as help to quantify atherosclerosis burden and evaluate the efficacy of therapies at the molecular, cellular and functional levels. FI, fluorescence imaging; ICG, indocyanine green; LOX1, lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor 1; MARCO, macrophage receptor MARCO; MMR, macrophage mannose receptor; OPN, osteopontin; PAI, photoacoustic imaging; PS, phosphatidylserine. MRI image adapted with permission from ref.[92], Elsevier. CT image adapted from ref.[100], Springer Nature Limited. PET image adapted from ref.[107], CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). FI image adapted with permission from ref.[79], American Chemical Society. PAI image adapted with permission from ref.[112], American Chemical Society.
Fig. 3Approaches for atherosclerosis treatment with macrophage-targeting nanotherapeutics.
a | Monocyte recruitment to the atherosclerotic lesion areas can be reduced by delivering therapeutics to monocytes or to vascular endothelial cells by nanoparticles. b | The proliferation of inflammatory macrophages can be inhibited by nanoparticle-assisted delivery of therapeutics to the lesional macrophages. c | The restoration of efferocytosis in macrophages by nanotherapeutics can help to remove dead cells from atherosclerotic plaques, prevent secondary necrosis and elicit the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ). d | Inflammation can be ameliorated by modulating the functions of lesional macrophages via nanotherapeutics, increasing the secretion of pro-resolving cytokines (such as IL-10 and TGFβ) or inhibiting the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6, IL-1β and TNF) from lesional macrophages. e | Induction of macrophage apoptosis by local heating or by toxic agents can reduce macrophage burden in atherosclerotic lesions. However, this strategy is suitable only for early lesions. In late atherosclerotic lesions, the impaired phagocytic clearance of apoptotic macrophages might lead to secondary necrosis of these cells and a pro-inflammatory response. f | Promotion of cholesterol efflux from the cholesterol-laden macrophage by nanotherapeutics can reduce foam cell formation.
Examples of preclinical-stage macrophage-targeted nanomedicine for atherosclerosis treatment
| Nanoparticle platform | Active pharmaceutical ingredients | Animal model | Treatment frequency/method | Therapeutic outcomes | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reconstituted HDL nanoparticles | Small-molecule inhibitor of CD40–TRAF6 signalling | Four treatments for 1 week | Decreased macrophage burden and inflammation in atherosclerotic plaques | [ | |
| Twice per week for 6 weeks | Reduced plaque sizes, increased collagen cap areas and attenuated the initiation of atherosclerosis | [ | |||
| PLGA nanoparticles | Pitavastatin | Once per week for 4 weeks | Reduced macrophage burden and MMP9 and CCL2 levels in atherosclerotic plaques, decreased plaque area and plaque destabilization and rupture, and increased fibrous cap area in the brachiocephalic artery | [ | |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | Five siRNAs targeting key adhesion molecules | Once per week for 3 weeks | Reduced macrophage and neutrophil burden and necrotic core area in atherosclerotic plaques, decreased plaque area, increased fibrous cap area and decreased protease activity in the aortic root | [ | |
| Reconstituted HDL nanoparticles | Simvastatin | Four treatments for 1 week | Decreased macrophage burden in atherosclerotic plaques | [ | |
| Twice per week for 12 weeks | Reduced macrophage burden in atherosclerotic plaques and reduced plaque sizes | [ | |||
| Cyclodextrin-based phospholipid nanoparticles | Simvastatin | Twice per week for 4 weeks | Decreased atherosclerotic plaque size in aortic roots, aortic arches and brachiocephalic arteries | [ | |
| SWNTs | Small-molecule inhibitor of antiphagocytic CD47–SIRPα | Once per week for 9 weeks | Increased macrophage-associated apoptotic cells and reduced inflammation burden in atherosclerotic plaques and decreased plaque area and necrotic core area | [ | |
| S2P receptor-targeted PLGA-PEG nanoparticles | Twice per week for 4 weeks | Increased fibrous cap thickness and macrophage-associated apoptotic cells in atherosclerotic plaques and decreased necrotic core area | [ | ||
| Collagen IV-targeted PLGA nanoparticles | The inflammation-resolving protein IL-10 | Once per week for 4 weeks | Increased fibrous cap thickness and lesional efferocytosis and decreased necrotic core area and ROS levels in advanced atherosclerotic lesions | [ | |
| Collagen IV-targeted PLGA nanoparticles | Ac2-26 pro-resolving peptide | Once per week for 5 weeks | Increased fibrous cap thickness and decreased necrotic core area and ROS levels in advanced atherosclerotic lesions | [ | |
| Platelet-derived extracellular vesicles | NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor | Nine treatments during 3 weeks | Decreased local inflammation and macrophage and T cell burdens in atherosclerotic plaques and reduced plaque size | [ | |
| PLGA nanoparticles | Pioglitazone | Once per week for 4 weeks | Decreased circulating inflammatory Ly6Chigh monocytes, reduced activity of MMP and cathepsins in brachiocephalic arteries, and increased fibrous cap area | [ | |
| Cyclodextrin-based polysaccharide nanoparticles | Superoxide dismutase mimetic agent and hydrogen peroxide-scavenging compound | Twice per week for 8 weeks | Decreased systemic and plaque oxidative stress and inflammation, reduced cholesterol crystal levels, necrotic core area and plaque size, and increased fibrous cap area in aortic roots, aortic arches and brachiocephalic arteries | [ | |
| Crosslinked dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles | Photosensitizer | Carotid artery was stimulated with 650-nm laser light 24 h after one injection | Increased macrophage apoptosis and decreased macrophage burden in the carotid artery | [ | |
| PEG-SWNTs | Photothermal agent | Mice fed a high-fat diet and treated with streptozotocin, followed by carotid artery ligation | Carotid artery was excised and photothermally ablated with 808-nm laser light 48 h after one injection | Increased macrophage apoptosis and decreased macrophage burden in the carotid artery | [ |
| Cyclodextrin-derived and integrin-targeting nanoparticles | Anti-miR-33 | Two treatments in the first week and once per week thereafter for 2 months | Decreased cholesterol crystal levels, MMP expression and macrophage burden in atherosclerotic plaques, reduced plaque size in aortic roots, aortic arches and brachiocephalic arteries, and increased fibrous cap area | [ | |
| Collagen IV-targeted PLA nanoparticles | Liver X receptor agonist (GW3965) | Twice per week for 5 weeks | Decreased macrophage burden and increased | [ | |
MI, myocardial infarction; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; PEG, polyethylene glycol; PLA, polylactic acid; PLGA, poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid); ROS, reactive oxygen species; siRNA, small interfering RNA; SIRPα, signal-regulatory protein-α; SWNT, single-walled carbon nanotube.
Fig. 4Timeline of major developments in the field of atherosclerosis nanomedicine.
Milestones in the development of nanoparticle-based imaging contrast agents and therapeutics for atherosclerosis diagnosis and treatment. NP, nanoparticle; USPIO, ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide.
Examples of clinical trials on macrophage-targeted nanomedicine for atherosclerosis treatment and diagnosis
| Study name | Design | Cohort | Number of patients | Nanoparticle platform | Active pharmaceutical ingredients | Study objectives | Status/outcomes | Refs; trial numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Patients with stable CAD | 40 | LDL-like nanoparticles | Methotrexate | Safety and efficacy of LDL-like nanoparticles loaded with the anti-inflammatory agent methotrexate in reducing plaque volume and adverse characteristics | Ongoing, estimated completion in autumn 2023 | [ |
| PAC-MAN | Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Patients with stable CAD | 40 | LDL-like nanoparticles | Paclitaxel | Safety and efficacy of LDL-like nanoparticles loaded with the anti-proliferative agent paclitaxel in reducing plaque volume and adverse characteristics | Ongoing, estimated completion in summer 2021 | [ |
| AEGIS-II | Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Patients with acute coronary syndrome | 17,400 | CSL112 HDL-like nanoparticles | HDL-like nanoparticles | Efficacy and safety of CSL112 in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke) | Ongoing, estimated completion in spring 2023 | [ |
| TANGO | Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Patients with genetically determined very low levels of HDL cholesterol | 30 | CER-001 HDL-like nanoparticles | HDL-like nanoparticles | Efficacy of the HDL mimetic CER-001 in reducing vessel wall area and arterial wall inflammation | CER-001 treatment did not reduce carotid vessel wall dimensions or arterial wall inflammation | [ |
| MILANO-PILOT | Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Patients with recent acute coronary syndrome | 122 | MDCO-216 HDL-like nanoparticles | HDL-like nanoparticles | Efficacy of the HDL mimetic MDCO-216 in reducing coronary artery atherosclerosis progression | MDCO-216 treatment did not produce plaque regression in statin-treated patients following an acute coronary syndrome | [ |
| Gille et al. | Phase I, II and IIa, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Patients with stable atherosclerotic disease and healthy individuals | 57, 36 and 44 | CSL112 HDL-like nanoparticles | HDL-like nanoparticles | Efficacy of the HDL mimetic CSL112 in improving cholesterol efflux capacity | CSL112 treatment increased cholesterol efflux similarly in healthy individuals and in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease compared with untreated controls | [ |
| NANOM-FIM | Multicentre, randomized, double-blind, observational | Patients with CAD and angiographic SYNTAX score ≤22 | 180 | Silica–gold nanoparticles | Gold nanoparticles | Efficacy and safety of silica–gold nanoparticles in inducing plaque regression by plasmonic photothermal therapy | Reduction of plaque burden; 5-year follow-up study showed high safety with lower mortality, fewer major adverse cardiovascular events and less target-lesion revascularization compared with sirolimus-eluting stenting control | [ |
| CARAT | Phase II, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Patients with acute coronary syndrome and high plaque burden receiving statin therapy | 293 | CER-001 HDL-like nanoparticles | HDL-like nanoparticles | Effect of the HDL mimetic CER-001 on coronary artery atherosclerosis progression | No regression of coronary atherosclerosis | [ |
| CHI- SQUARE | Phase II, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Patients with acute coronary syndrome | 507 | CER-001 HDL-like nanoparticles | HDL-like nanoparticles | Effect of the HDL mimetic CER-001 on coronary atherosclerosis progression | CER-001 infusions did not reduce coronary atherosclerosis measured by intravascular ultrasonography and quantitative coronary angiography | [ |
| Nissen et al. | Pilot, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Patients with acute coronary syndromes | 123 | ETC-216 HDL-like nanoparticles | HDL-like nanoparticles | Efficacy of the HDL mimetic ETC-216 in reducing atheroma burden | Regression of coronary artery atherosclerosis as measured by intravascular ultrasonography imaging | [ |
| SILENCE | Phase I/II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Patients with severe inflamed carotid or aortic atherosclerosis | 30 | Liposomes | Prednisolone | Efficacy of long-circulating liposomal glucocorticoids in reducing vessel wall inflammation | Plaque-accumulated liposomal prednisolone had no anti-inflammatory effect | [ |
| LOCATION | Observational, single group | Patients with atherosclerotic carotid artery disease (>50% stenosis) | 8 | 89Zr-labelled CER-001 HDL-like nanoparticles | 89Zr | Evaluation of the delivery efficacy of the HDL mimetic CER-001 to carotid plaques, assessed by PET–CT imaging | Infusion of CER-001 increased plasma cholesterol efflux capacity; CER-001 targeted plaque regions | [ |
| Zheng et al. | Observational | Patients with peripheral artery disease | 18 | Carboxymethyl-dextran-coated USPIO nanoparticles (ferumoxytol) | USPIO nanoparticles | Non-invasive assessment of whether delivery efficacy of nanoparticles depends on plaque permeability | Quantitative USPIO-enhanced MRI demonstrated that ferumoxytol accumulated in atherosclerotic plaques after systemic infusion | [ |
| Smits et al. | Observational | Patients with carotid artery stenosis >30% | 9 | Carboxymethyl-dextran-coated USPIO nanoparticles (ferumoxytol) | USPIO nanoparticles | Relationship between USPIO nanoparticle uptake and plaque burden in atherosclerotic plaques, assessed by MRI | Ferumoxytol was taken up by atherosclerotic plaques and might be used for carotid USPIO-enhanced MRI | [ |
| ATHEROMA | Observational, double-blind | Patients with carotid stenosis >40% assessed by duplex ultrasonography | 47 | Dextran-coated USPIO nanoparticles (ferumoxtran-10) | USPIO nanoparticles | Effect of atorvastatin therapy on carotid plaque inflammation as assessed by USPIO-enhanced MRI | Reduction of USPIO-defined inflammation after high-dose atorvastatin treatment | [ |
| Tang et al. and Howarth et al. | Observational | Patients with carotid stenosis | 20 | Dextran-coated USPIO nanoparticles (ferumoxtran-10) | USPIO nanoparticles | Differences in the degree of MRI-defined inflammation between patients with symptomatic carotid artery atherosclerosis and patients with asymptomatic carotid artery atherosclerosis | Plaques in symptomatic patients had a much greater degree of signal loss, indicating higher inflammation, than plaques from asymptomatic patients | [ |
| Schmitz et al. | Phase III, multicentre, observational | Patients with unenhanced and SPIO-enhanced MRI of the pelvis were included for retrospective analysis | 20 | Dextran-coated SPIO nanoparticles (ferumoxtran-10) | SPIO nanoparticles | Incidentally found SPIO nanoparticle uptake in aortic and arterial wall | Infusion of SPIO nanoparticles enhanced the contrast of atherosclerotic plaques in MRI | [ |
CAD, coronary artery disease; NA, not applicable; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide; USPIO, ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide.