Literature DB >> 34754432

Association of leukocyte telomere length with chronic kidney disease in East Asians with type 2 diabetes: a Mendelian randomization study.

Resham L Gurung1, Rajkumar Dorajoo2, Yiamunaa M1, Ling Wang2, Sylvia Liu1, Jian-Jun Liu2, Yi Ming Shao1, Yuqing Chen3, Xueling Sim3, Keven Ang1, Tavintharan Subramaniam4, Wern Ee Tang5, Chee Fang Sum4, Jian-Jun Liu2, Su Chi Lim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and increases the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular diseases. Shorter leukocyte telomere length (LTL) is associated with CKD in patients with T2D. We previously reported single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with LTL in an Asian population. In this study, we elucidated the association of these SNPs with CKD in patients with T2D using the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.
METHODS: The cross-sectional association of 16 LTL SNPs with CKD, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, was assessed among 4768 (1628 cases and 3140 controls) participants in the Singapore Study of Macro-angiopathy and Micro-vascular Reactivity in T2D and Diabetic Nephropathy cohorts. MR analysis was performed using the random-effect inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, the weighted median, MR-Egger and Radial MR adjusted for age and sex-stratified by cohorts and ethnicity (Chinese and Malays), then meta-analyzed.
RESULTS: Genetically determined shorter LTL was associated with increased risk of CKD in patients with T2D (meta-IVW adjusted odds ratio = 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.12-2.12, P = 0.007, Phet  = 0.547). Similar results were obtained following sensitivity analysis. MR-Egger analysis (intercept) suggested no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy (β = 0.010, P = 0.751).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that genetically determined LTL is associated with CKD in patients with T2D. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the causal role of telomere length in CKD progression.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mendelian randomization analysis; chronic kidney disease; telomere length; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2021        PMID: 34754432      PMCID: PMC8573005          DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfab067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Kidney J        ISSN: 2048-8505


INTRODUCTION

Telomeres are DNA–protein structures at the ends of chromosomes that protect the genome from damage [1]. In most somatic tissues, telomeres shorten progressively with cell division [2]. When telomere lengths are critically short, it triggers apoptosis or replicative senescence [3, 4]. Therefore, telomere length is recognized as a biomarker for cellular aging [5]. Leukocyte telomere length (LTL), predominantly measured in epidemiological studies, is correlated with telomere length in multiple tissues in humans, including kidney tissues [6-8], and is inversely associated with risk of aging-related diseases including cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality [9-11]. Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a leading cause of renal failure, cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) [12-15]. Observational studies have demonstrated inverse associations between LTL and risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with T2D [16-19]. However, observational studies are prone to reverse causation and confounding factors. Moreover, LTL is modulated by oxidative stress as well as inflammation, obesity, and genetic and environmental factors [20, 21]. Therefore, it is uncertain whether shorter LTL is causally associated with DKD. The Mendelian randomization (MR) approach uses single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are robustly associated with a risk factor to estimate the causal relationship between a risk factor and a disease [22]. Given that germline genetic variants are randomly assorted at meiosis, the MR approach is less prone to residual biases, confounding and reverse causation. For inferencing causality, it is essential that the assumptions of MR are satisfied. These are: (i) the selected SNPs are associated with exposure (telomere length); (ii) the selected SNPs are not associated with confounders; and (iii) the selected SNPs are associated with outcome exclusively through their effect on exposure (telomere length). To our knowledge, the causal effect of shorter leukocyte telomeres in CKD in patients with T2D has not been evaluated in East Asians. A recent large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) in the Singapore Chinese Health Study (SCHS) cohort identified 16 SNPs associated with LTL [23]. In this study, we performed two-sample MR with summary statistics of SNP–LTL associations from the SCHS cohort and SNP–DKD association determined in this study to investigate the causal relationship between LTL and CKD in patients with T2D.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SNP selection

Ten SNPs robustly associated (P < 5 × 10−8) with LTL in the Singapore Chinese population (N = 25 273; mean age = 55 years) and an additional six independent SNPs identified after meta-analysis with European cohorts (n = 37 505) [23] were selected as instrumental variables (IVs). These 16 SNPs are located in different regions and close to genes coding for proteins involved in telomere homeostasis, such as shelterin complex, DNA repair pathways and telomerase enzyme. The list of 16 SNPs selected as IV for LTL, and the coefficient estimate for LTL (βLTL), are shown in Table 1. Together, these 16 SNPs explained ∼4% of the variation in LTL in the Singaporean Chinese population [23]. The beta estimate reflects changes in standard deviation (SD) of the standardized levels of LTL adjusted for age, sex and principal components.
Table 1.

SNPs selected as IV and its association with LTL and CKD

SNPChrPosition (hg19)GeneTest alleleSNP–LTL
SNP–CKD
β SE (β)loge (OR)SEP-value
rs32191041226562621 PARP1 A−0.0740.009−0.0130.0480.780
rs11890390254485682 ACYP2 C−0.0400.0120.1250.0650.055
rs22936073169482335 TERC C−0.1200.0090.0300.0580.406
rs108573524164101482 NAF1 A−0.0640.011−0.0040.0790.544
rs770552651285974 TERT C−0.1180.0090.0440.0500.386
rs77767447124599749 POT1 G−0.0580.0090.0760.0490.126
rs28365964873920883 TERF1 T−0.2700.0350.2490.2190.256
rs1241514810105680586 OBFC1 T−0.2040.0200.0050.0740.947
rs709595310101274425 NKX2-3 C−0.0470.0090.0590.0480.222
rs22708011108247888 ATM G−0.0600.0090.0680.0660.102
rs23025881473404752 DCAF4 G−0.0420.0110.1150.0760.035
rs412938361424721327 TINF2 C−0.2330.0170.1260.0580.029
rs29673741682209861 MPHOSPH6 G−0.0560.012−0.0410.0830.704
rs100176118662103 TYMS A−0.0420.010−0.1010.0900.256
rs72534901922293706 ZNF208, ZNF257, ZNF676 C−0.0360.010−0.0510.0510.317
rs413093672062309554 RTEL1 T−0.0580.0100.0640.1010.529

Chr, chromosome number; CKD, chronic kidney disease; LTL, leukocyte telomere length; OR odds ratio; SE, standard error.

SNPs selected as IV and its association with LTL and CKD Chr, chromosome number; CKD, chronic kidney disease; LTL, leukocyte telomere length; OR odds ratio; SE, standard error.

Study design and cohorts

This is a cross-sectional study. We utilized a two-sample MR framework using two non-overlapping cohorts. We used summary statistic of a GWAS of LTL in the SCHS [23]. The association of SNPs with CKD was estimated in two independent T2D cohorts in Khoo Teck Puat Hospital: The Diabetes Nephropathy (DN) [24] and the Singapore Study of Macro-angiopathy and Micro-vascular Reactivity in T2D (SMART2D) [25] cohorts. Briefly, the DN is an on-going study including 4590 participants (age 21 years and above) recruited between March 2004 and December 2017, and the SMART2D dataset is a prospective cohort with baseline recruitment of 2052 T2D participants (age 21 years and above) between August 2011 and February 2014. Genotyping for the SMART2D and DN cohorts were carried using Illumina Humanomniexpress-24 Bead Chip and Illumina HumanOmniZhonghua Bead Chip, respectively, and quality control procedures have been described previously [26, 27]. An additional 253 Chinese and 245 Malay samples from the DN studies were genotyped using the Illumina GSA array, and quality control procedures are indicated in Supplementary data, Table S1. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the DN and SMART2D datasets was calculated using CKD Epidemiology Collaboration equation and CKD was defined as eGFR ˂60 mL/min/1.73 m2. In this study, only participants with information on renal condition and genotype data were included (DN: Chinese  = 2459, Malay = 837; SMART2D: Chinese = 1033, Malay = 439) (Supplementary data, Figure S1). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant, and the study has been approved by the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board in Singapore.

Statistical analysis

Association of LTL shortening SNPs with CKD

The association of each IV with CKD in the Khoo Teck Puat Hospital (KTPH) cohort was determined by logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. Analysis was first performed separately in the DN and SMART2D, stratified by ethnic group and pooled using a random effect meta-analysis (βSNP–CKD). Heterogeneity in meta-analyzed data was determined using I2 statistic and Cochran’s Q P-value (Phet) <0.05 was determined to be significantly heterogeneous.

MR analysis

The SNP–LTL (βSNP–LTL) and SNP–CKD (βSNP–CKD) coefficients were combined using an inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method to give an overall estimate of the causal effect. This method assumes that all the SNPs included are valid instruments, and the effect size represents a weighted average of Wald ratio estimates derived from all the IVs [28]. The odds ratio (OR) from the weighted regression represents the increased risk of CKD per SD shortening in LTL. Heterogeneity in meta-analysed data was determined using I2 statistic and Phet < 0.05 was determined to be significantly heterogeneous.

Sensitivity analysis

The weighted median method and MR-Egger regression were performed to assess if the MR IVW estimates are biased and affected by violation of MR assumptions (i.e. horizontal pleiotropy) [29]. The weighted median method employs the weighted empirical distribution function of each SNP ratio estimate and provides a median value. This approach yields a consistent estimate of a true causal effect as long as >50% of SNPs are valid [29]. The MR-Egger regression was utilized to formally test for potential violations of MR assumptions. Intercept with P > 0.05 indicates no horizontal pleiotropy exists. We also performed leave-one-out analysis, where each SNP was removed systematically, and IVW analysis was performed in the remaining 15 SNPs, to identify potentially influential SNP driving the association. All analysis was performed using R, version 3.1.2., and Stata released version 14.0 (StatCorp LP). The MendelianRandomization and RadialMR R package were used to perform MR and sensitivity analysis. P-values were two-sided, and evidence of association was declared at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the 4768 T2D participants, the mean age [standard error (SE)] was 58.4 (11.7) years, 57.7% were male and 34.1% had CKD at baseline (Supplementary data, Table S2). The list of IVs for LTL and their pooled association with CKD from the DN and SMART2D cohorts using random-effect IVW is shown in Table 1 and Supplementary data, Table S3. Of the 16 SNPs, rs41293836 (β = 0.126, SE = 0.058, P = 0.029) and rs2302588 (β = 0.115, SE = 0.076, P = 0.035) were associated with increased risk of CKD. Primary MR analysis using IVW method demonstrated that shorter genetically predicted LTL was associated with increased risk of CKD [OR = 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–2.12, P = 0.007, Phet = 0.547] (Table 2 and Figure 1). Similar observation was obtained using the weighted median analysis (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.03–2.24, P = 0.035). The MR-Egger regression showed no evidence of directional pleiotropy (intercept β = 0.010, SE = 0.028, P = 0.715). Radial MR approach also did not reveal evidence of outlying genetic variants, in agreement with the MR-Egger regression analysis (Figure 2).
Table 2.

MR for LTL on CKD

N SNPsOR (95% CI)aP-valuePhet
Inverse-variance weighted161.51 (1.12–2.12)0.0070.547
Weighted median161.52 (1.03–2.24)0.035
MR-Egger161.38 (0.82–2.35)0.2200.481
Interceptb0.010 (0.028)0.715

OR per 1-SD shortening in LTL. bIntercept is presented as β coefficients with SEs. Model adjusted for age and sex. Phet represents Cochran’s Q P-value after meta-analysis. N SNPs, number of SNPs.

FIGURE 1:

Scatter plot to visualize the causal effect of LTL on CKD.

FIGURE 2:

Radial plot to visualize individual outlier SNPs in the MR estimates for CKD. Black dots show valid SNPs and green dots (if any) display invalid outlier SNPs. The curved black line represents ratio estimates of each SNPs.

Scatter plot to visualize the causal effect of LTL on CKD. Radial plot to visualize individual outlier SNPs in the MR estimates for CKD. Black dots show valid SNPs and green dots (if any) display invalid outlier SNPs. The curved black line represents ratio estimates of each SNPs. MR for LTL on CKD OR per 1-SD shortening in LTL. bIntercept is presented as β coefficients with SEs. Model adjusted for age and sex. Phet represents Cochran’s Q P-value after meta-analysis. N SNPs, number of SNPs. We further performed leave-one-out analysis to explore whether the associations between genetically determined LTL and CKD were driven by particular SNPs. Compared with the observed results (OR = 1.51) from 16 SNPs, the ORs fluctuated from 1.39 to 1.63, and the largest decrease and increase in OR was observed after removing rs41293836 and rs12415148, respectively. However, only removal of rs41293836 [near TERF1-interacting nuclear factor 2 (TINF2)] attenuated the association of LTL and CKD (P = 0.080), suggesting TINF2 may drive the IVW point estimate (Supplementary data, Figure S2). Among the 16 SNPs, data on association for eight of these SNPs with HbA1c levels in the East Asian population were available in the MAGIC (Meta-Analysis of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium) study. MR analysis found no causal relation between LTL and HbA1c levels (β = 0.022, SE = 0.035, P = 0.534). We calculated the power for this study with the assumption that the proportion of LTL variance explained by all 16 SNPs is R2 = 4% and with type 1 error of 0.05. Using mRnd (https://shiny.cnsgenomics.com/mRnd/), this study had 82% power to detect per allele effect of LTL on CKD with corresponding OR of 1.50, at a significant level of 0.05.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we used a two-sample MR framework to demonstrate that shorter genetically predicted LTL was also associated with increased risk of CKD in patients with T2D. This finding was robust and consistent in the sensitivity analysis. Leave-one-out analysis suggests rs41293836 near TINF2 may drive the observed association between genetically determined LTL and CKD. Our findings are consistent with observational studies where shorter LTL was associated with renal dysfunction cross-sectionally [16, 18] and prospectively [17, 30]. Specifically, in the meta-analysis of MMKD (Mild to Moderate Kidney Disease; n = 166) and CRISIS (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Standards Implementation; n = 889) cohorts, shorter LTL was significantly associated with increased risk for CKD progression in diabetic patients but not in non-diabetic patients [17]. These results are in contrast to a study demonstrating that the association between LTL and CKD was entirely explained by age [31]. These inconsistent findings may be due to residual confounding or biased by reverse causation in conventional observational studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first MR analysis investigating the potential causal relationship between LTL and CKD in East Asians with T2D. A previous MR study performed in non-diabetic Europeans reported a lack of causal relationship between LTL and kidney function defined using continuous traits (creatinine, albuminin and cystatin) in the general population [32]. Moreover, the analysis with CKD was not reported. This difference might reflect different pathophysiologic mechanisms behind CKD in T2D and the general population, or could be due to different selection and strength of the IVs used in this study. We also found that the association observed in our study seems to be driven by rs41293836 near TINF2/TGM1 loci in chromosome 14, which is monomorphic or rare in the European population but polymorphic and common in the Chinese population. Additionally, given that the diabetic condition is associated with an elevated level of oxidative stress and inflammation, factors that also accelerate telomere shortening and aging [33], it is possible that impact of telomere shortening on renal function is exacerbated in the diabetic condition when compared with non-diabetics. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the exact role of telomere length in CKD in diabetic population. Examination of the associations between individual LTL genetic risk loci and CKD highlighted TINF2 as the main driver of the association. Several studies have identified deleterious mutations in TINF2 in patients with short telomere syndrome diseases such as dyskeratosis congenita and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [34-36]. TINF2 is a component of the telomere shelterin protein complex and regulates telomerase activity [37]. In germline and stem cells, telomerase activity is essential for the maintenance of telomere length and therefore, cell renewal capacity. However, the role of TINF2 in CKD in patients with T2D has not yet been clearly demonstrated. In human kidney, telomere length decreases more rapidly in the renal cortex than in the medulla during aging [2], contributing to the cortical scarring and glomerular senescence observed in aging kidneys. Using mice model, Westhoff et al. [38] showed that shorter telomere contributed to increased renal injury and decreased recovery after insult. Therefore, it is likely that shorter leukocyte telomere, as a result of increased oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, may reflect a state of compromised immune response and increased susceptibility to renal injury. Alternatively, as LTL is correlated with intrarenal telomere length (r = 0.4, P = 0.001) [39], it is also likely that shorter telomeres increase the likelihood of chromosomal damage, leading to cellular senescence or apoptosis and renal damage. The strengths of this study are the robust genetic instrument identified in the same population explaining ∼4% of the variance in LTL (double the phenotypic variance identified in Europeans previously) and the use of multiple MR methods with different assumptions. Moreover, we used two-sample MR where IV and the estimation of the IV with CKD in patients with T2D were derived from two independent populations, reducing bias in the causal estimate [40]. However, this study also has some limitations. First, the IV was derived for blood telomere length and not telomere length in renal tissues. However, studies have shown that LTL correlates with telomere length in other tissues, including renal tissues (r = 0.4, P = 0.001) [6, 39, 41]. Second, pooled data using random-effect meta-analysis from the Chinese and Malay T2D participants were included in MR analysis to increase the sample size and hence statistical power. Third, the SNPs selected as IVs were derived mainly from the non-diabetic population, which may potentially reduce the validity of the measure in our study. However, we have shown that in a subset of KTPH Chinese T2D subjects (n = 1602), 12 SNPs were directionally consistent in T2D population (binomial P = 0.028) and the top hit at chromosome 14 (rs41293836) showed a statistically significant association with LTL [23]. Lastly, given that individual-level telomere length data were not available for all the participants in our study population, we were not able to assess if the IV is associated with CKD independent of its effect on telomere length. Although we performed sensitivity analysis and demonstrated the absence of directional pleiotropic effects, we cannot completely exclude the possibility. In summary, we demonstrated a potential role of LTL in the development of CKD in East Asians with T2D. However, further studies in larger-scale East Asian T2D populations are warranted to validate our findings and elucidate the causal role of telomere length in CKD progression. With potential therapies to minimize premature leukocyte telomere shortening available [42, 43], preventing premature telomere shortening may provide a strategy to prevent CKD and reduce the public burden of diabetes-related complications.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data are available at ckj online. Click here for additional data file.
  43 in total

1.  THE LIMITED IN VITRO LIFETIME OF HUMAN DIPLOID CELL STRAINS.

Authors:  L HAYFLICK
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 2.  Telomere Length and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Yiqiang Zhan; Nancy L Pedersen; Fang Fang; Sara Hägg
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 10.895

3.  Telomere length in different tissues of elderly patients.

Authors:  U Friedrich; E Griese; M Schwab; P Fritz; K Thon; U Klotz
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms of diabetic kidney disease.

Authors:  Kimberly Reidy; Hyun Mi Kang; Thomas Hostetter; Katalin Susztak
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Association Between Telomere Length and Risk of Cancer and Non-Neoplastic Diseases: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Philip C Haycock; Stephen Burgess; Aayah Nounu; Jie Zheng; George N Okoli; Jack Bowden; Kaitlin Hazel Wade; Nicholas J Timpson; David M Evans; Peter Willeit; Abraham Aviv; Tom R Gaunt; Gibran Hemani; Massimo Mangino; Hayley Patricia Ellis; Kathreena M Kurian; Karen A Pooley; Rosalind A Eeles; Jeffrey E Lee; Shenying Fang; Wei V Chen; Matthew H Law; Lisa M Bowdler; Mark M Iles; Qiong Yang; Bradford B Worrall; Hugh Stephen Markus; Rayjean J Hung; Chris I Amos; Amanda B Spurdle; Deborah J Thompson; Tracy A O'Mara; Brian Wolpin; Laufey Amundadottir; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon; Antonia Trichopoulou; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Eiliv Lund; Eric J Duell; Federico Canzian; Gianluca Severi; Kim Overvad; Marc J Gunter; Rosario Tumino; Ulrika Svenson; Andre van Rij; Annette F Baas; Matthew J Bown; Nilesh J Samani; Femke N G van t'Hof; Gerard Tromp; Gregory T Jones; Helena Kuivaniemi; James R Elmore; Mattias Johansson; James Mckay; Ghislaine Scelo; Robert Carreras-Torres; Valerie Gaborieau; Paul Brennan; Paige M Bracci; Rachel E Neale; Sara H Olson; Steven Gallinger; Donghui Li; Gloria M Petersen; Harvey A Risch; Alison P Klein; Jiali Han; Christian C Abnet; Neal D Freedman; Philip R Taylor; John M Maris; Katja K Aben; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Sita H Vermeulen; John K Wiencke; Kyle M Walsh; Margaret Wrensch; Terri Rice; Clare Turnbull; Kevin Litchfield; Lavinia Paternoster; Marie Standl; Gonçalo R Abecasis; John Paul SanGiovanni; Yong Li; Vladan Mijatovic; Yadav Sapkota; Siew-Kee Low; Krina T Zondervan; Grant W Montgomery; Dale R Nyholt; David A van Heel; Karen Hunt; Dan E Arking; Foram N Ashar; Nona Sotoodehnia; Daniel Woo; Jonathan Rosand; Mary E Comeau; W Mark Brown; Edwin K Silverman; John E Hokanson; Michael H Cho; Jennie Hui; Manuel A Ferreira; Philip J Thompson; Alanna C Morrison; Janine F Felix; Nicholas L Smith; Angela M Christiano; Lynn Petukhova; Regina C Betz; Xing Fan; Xuejun Zhang; Caihong Zhu; Carl D Langefeld; Susan D Thompson; Feijie Wang; Xu Lin; David A Schwartz; Tasha Fingerlin; Jerome I Rotter; Mary Frances Cotch; Richard A Jensen; Matthias Munz; Henrik Dommisch; Arne S Schaefer; Fang Han; Hanna M Ollila; Ryan P Hillary; Omar Albagha; Stuart H Ralston; Chenjie Zeng; Wei Zheng; Xiao-Ou Shu; Andre Reis; Steffen Uebe; Ulrike Hüffmeier; Yoshiya Kawamura; Takeshi Otowa; Tsukasa Sasaki; Martin Lloyd Hibberd; Sonia Davila; Gang Xie; Katherine Siminovitch; Jin-Xin Bei; Yi-Xin Zeng; Asta Försti; Bowang Chen; Stefano Landi; Andre Franke; Annegret Fischer; David Ellinghaus; Carlos Flores; Imre Noth; Shwu-Fan Ma; Jia Nee Foo; Jianjun Liu; Jong-Won Kim; David G Cox; Olivier Delattre; Olivier Mirabeau; Christine F Skibola; Clara S Tang; Merce Garcia-Barcelo; Kai-Ping Chang; Wen-Hui Su; Yu-Sun Chang; Nicholas G Martin; Scott Gordon; Tracey D Wade; Chaeyoung Lee; Michiaki Kubo; Pei-Chieng Cha; Yusuke Nakamura; Daniel Levy; Masayuki Kimura; Shih-Jen Hwang; Steven Hunt; Tim Spector; Nicole Soranzo; Ani W Manichaikul; R Graham Barr; Bratati Kahali; Elizabeth Speliotes; Laura M Yerges-Armstrong; Ching-Yu Cheng; Jost B Jonas; Tien Yin Wong; Isabella Fogh; Kuang Lin; John F Powell; Kenneth Rice; Caroline L Relton; Richard M Martin; George Davey Smith
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Association of relative telomere length with progression of chronic kidney disease in two cohorts: effect modification by smoking and diabetes.

Authors:  Julia Raschenberger; Barbara Kollerits; James Ritchie; Beverley Lane; Philip A Kalra; Eberhard Ritz; Florian Kronenberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  George Davey Smith; Gibran Hemani
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Genetic variants in the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) gene were associated with circulating soluble RAGE level but not with renal function among Asians with type 2 diabetes: a genome-wide association study.

Authors:  Su Chi Lim; Rajkumar Dorajoo; Xiao Zhang; Ling Wang; Su Fen Ang; Clara Si Hua Tan; Lee Ying Yeoh; Xiao Wei Ng; Na Li; Chang Su; Sylvia Liu; Melvin D S Wong; Kiat Mun Serena Low; Amy Ou Yao; Jeevith Babitha; Sharon Fun; Shiyi Zhou; Simon Biing Ming Lee; Wern Ee Tang; Subramaniam Tavintharan; Chee Fang Sum; Jian-Jun Liu
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Telomeres shorten at equivalent rates in somatic tissues of adults.

Authors:  Lily Daniali; Athanase Benetos; Ezra Susser; Jeremy D Kark; Carlos Labat; Masayuki Kimura; Kunji Desai; Mark Granick; Abraham Aviv
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk Factors of Pancreatic Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Hong Kong Diabetes Study.

Authors:  Raymond Ngai Chiu Chan; Teddy Tai Loy Lee; Oscar Hou In Chou; Jenny So; Cheuk To Chung; Edward Christopher Dee; Kenrick Ng; Pias Tang; Leonardo Roever; Tong Liu; Wing Tak Wong; Gary Tse; Sharen Lee
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2022-09-05

2.  Genetic Evidence Supporting a Causal Role of Snoring in Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Yang Xiong; Xin Zhong; Fuxun Zhang; Wei Wang; Yangchang Zhang; Changjing Wu; Feng Qin; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  Genetically predicted higher educational attainment decreases the risk of stroke: a multivariable Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Weihao Zhang; Yuanjin Li; Yuming Li; Kai Zheng; Shenghui Zou; Xing Jia; Hua Yang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.174

4.  Genetic association of leukocyte telomere length with Graves' disease in Biobank Japan: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Meijie Ye; Yu Wang; Yiqiang Zhan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.786

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.