Literature DB >> 27030760

Auditory Brainstem Response Latency in Noise as a Marker of Cochlear Synaptopathy.

Golbarg Mehraei1, Ann E Hickox2, Hari M Bharadwaj3, Hannah Goldberg4, Sarah Verhulst5, M Charles Liberman6, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham7.   

Abstract

Evidence from animal and human studies suggests that moderate acoustic exposure, causing only transient threshold elevation, can nonetheless cause "hidden hearing loss" that interferes with coding of suprathreshold sound. Such noise exposure destroys synaptic connections between cochlear hair cells and auditory nerve fibers; however, there is no clinical test of this synaptopathy in humans. In animals, synaptopathy reduces the amplitude of auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave-I. Unfortunately, ABR wave-I is difficult to measure in humans, limiting its clinical use. Here, using analogous measurements in humans and mice, we show that the effect of masking noise on the latency of the more robust ABR wave-V mirrors changes in ABR wave-I amplitude. Furthermore, in our human cohort, the effect of noise on wave-V latency predicts perceptual temporal sensitivity. Our results suggest that measures of the effects of noise on ABR wave-V latency can be used to diagnose cochlear synaptopathy in humans. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although there are suspicions that cochlear synaptopathy affects humans with normal hearing thresholds, no one has yet reported a clinical measure that is a reliable marker of such loss. By combining human and animal data, we demonstrate that the latency of auditory brainstem response wave-V in noise reflects auditory nerve loss. This is the first study of human listeners with normal hearing thresholds that links individual differences observed in behavior and auditory brainstem response timing to cochlear synaptopathy. These results can guide development of a clinical test to reveal this previously unknown form of noise-induced hearing loss in humans.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/363755-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory brainstem response; auditory nerve loss; cochlear synaptopathy; hidden hearing loss; temporal coding

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27030760      PMCID: PMC4812134          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4460-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  44 in total

1.  The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses.

Authors:  Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Salwa Masud; Golbarg Mehraei; Sarah Verhulst; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model.

Authors:  Roland Schaette; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Contribution of auditory nerve fibers to compound action potential of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Jérôme Bourien; Yong Tang; Charlène Batrel; Antoine Huet; Marc Lenoir; Sabine Ladrech; Gilles Desmadryl; Régis Nouvian; Jean-Luc Puel; Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. III. Anatomic locus.

Authors:  R Burkard; K E Hecox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.

Authors:  Greta C Stamper; Tiffany A Johnson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Chronux: a platform for analyzing neural signals.

Authors:  Hemant Bokil; Peter Andrews; Jayant E Kulkarni; Samar Mehta; Partha P Mitra
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Towards a Diagnosis of Cochlear Neuropathy with Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Luke A Shaheen; Michelle D Valero; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01

10.  Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Sarah Verhulst; Luke Shaheen; M Charles Liberman; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-21
View more
  80 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear synaptopathy in acquired sensorineural hearing loss: Manifestations and mechanisms.

Authors:  M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Andreu Paredes Gallardo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Electrophysiological markers of cochlear function correlate with hearing-in-noise performance among audiometrically normal subjects.

Authors:  Kelsie J Grant; Anita M Mepani; Peizhe Wu; Kenneth E Hancock; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Reliability of Measures Intended to Assess Threshold-Independent Hearing Disorders.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Translational issues in cochlear synaptopathy.

Authors:  Ann E Hickox; Erik Larsen; Michael G Heinz; Leslie Shinobu; Jonathon P Whitton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Txn2 haplodeficiency does not affect cochlear antioxidant defenses or accelerate the progression of cochlear cell loss or hearing loss across the lifespan.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Kim; Chul Han; Karessa White; Hyo-Jin Park; Dalian Ding; Kevin Boyd; Christina Rothenberger; Upal Bose; Peter Carmichael; Paul J Linser; Masaru Tanokura; Richard Salvi; Shinichi Someya
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.032

9.  Linking anatomical and physiological markers of auditory system degeneration with behavioral hearing assessments in a mouse (Mus musculus) model of age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Katrina M Schrode; Laurel A Screven; Hamad Javaid; Madison M Weinberg; Garrett Brown; Ryleigh Board; Dillan F Villavisanis; Micheal L Dent; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex vs. auditory brainstem response for hearing assessment.

Authors:  R J Longenecker; F Alghamdi; M J Rosen; A V Galazyuk
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.