Sang Wook Lee1, Hyun Joo Cho2, Hae-Won Shin3, Mark Hallett4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA; Center for Applied Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Research, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA; Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 3. Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: hallettm@ninds.nih.gov.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine interactions between cortical areas and between cortical areas and muscles during sensory tricks in cervical dystonia (CD). METHODS: Thirteen CD patients and thirteen age-matched healthy controls performed forewarned reaction time tasks, sensory tricks, and two tasks replicating aspects of the tricks (moving necks/arms). Control subjects mimicked sensory tricks. Corticocortical and corticomuscular coherence values were calculated from surface electrodes placed over motor, premotor, and sensory cortical areas and dystonic muscles. RESULTS: During initial preparation (after the warning stimulus), the only between-task difference was found in the γ-band corticocortical coherence (higher during tricks than during voluntary neck movements). With movements (before/after the imperative stimulus), the γ-band coherence of CD patients significantly increased during tricks but decreased during voluntary movements, while opposite trends were observed in healthy subjects. Additionally, the α- and β-band coherence decreased in healthy subjects during movements. Between the two patient subgroups (typical vs. forcible tricks), only those with typical tricks showed significant decrease in corticomuscular coherence during tricks. CONCLUSIONS: Observed changes in the corticocortical coherence suggest that sensory tricks improve cortical function, which reduces corticomuscular connectivity and the dystonia. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrated that sensory tricks fundamentally affect sensorimotor integration in CD, both in movement preparation and execution. Published by Elsevier B.V.
OBJECTIVE: To examine interactions between cortical areas and between cortical areas and muscles during sensory tricks in cervical dystonia (CD). METHODS: Thirteen CD patients and thirteen age-matched healthy controls performed forewarned reaction time tasks, sensory tricks, and two tasks replicating aspects of the tricks (moving necks/arms). Control subjects mimicked sensory tricks. Corticocortical and corticomuscular coherence values were calculated from surface electrodes placed over motor, premotor, and sensory cortical areas and dystonic muscles. RESULTS: During initial preparation (after the warning stimulus), the only between-task difference was found in the γ-band corticocortical coherence (higher during tricks than during voluntary neck movements). With movements (before/after the imperative stimulus), the γ-band coherence of CD patients significantly increased during tricks but decreased during voluntary movements, while opposite trends were observed in healthy subjects. Additionally, the α- and β-band coherence decreased in healthy subjects during movements. Between the two patient subgroups (typical vs. forcible tricks), only those with typical tricks showed significant decrease in corticomuscular coherence during tricks. CONCLUSIONS: Observed changes in the corticocortical coherence suggest that sensory tricks improve cortical function, which reduces corticomuscular connectivity and the dystonia. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrated that sensory tricks fundamentally affect sensorimotor integration in CD, both in movement preparation and execution. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Sahana N Kukke; Ana Carolina de Campos; Diane Damiano; Katharine E Alter; Nicholas Patronas; Mark Hallett Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 3.708