Lauren Swany1, A Noelle Larson2, Sumeet Garg3, Daniel Hedequist4, Peter Newton5, Paul Sponseller6. 1. Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, USA. larson.noelle@mayo.edu. 3. Pediatric Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery Center, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Orthopedics and Scoliosis, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In contrast to infection and curve progression, return to OR for implant malposition is potentially within the surgeon's control. With increasing surgeon familiarity with freehand/fluoroscopic pedicle screw placement, rates of return to OR due to malposition may have decreased over time. We sought to document the incidence and risk factors for return to OR due to screw malposition in a large cohort of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: AIS patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective registry with minimum 2-year follow-up undergoing PSF between 2003 and 2017 were included. Surgeries with the use of intraoperative CT-guided navigation were excluded. Return to OR due to screw malposition over time was tabulated. Lenke class, age at surgery, year of surgery, height, weight, surgeon and site were evaluated. RESULTS: 2435 patients underwent PSF with non-navigated open pedicle screw instrumentation. Mean age was 14.6 years, mean thoracic curve magnitude was 53°, and mean lumbar was 40°. Patients did not routinely undergo intraoperative or postoperative CT evaluation. There were 10 returns to OR for screw malposition at a mean of 0.83 years postoperatively (range 0.1-3.4 years), for an overall incidence of 0.4%. Of the 14 screws, 10 were thoracic, 7 were left-sided. No association was found between screw malposition and curve size, enrolling site, surgeon, BMI, Lenke class, or age. Five patients had radiculopathy which improved after screw revision. Return to OR for screw malposition changed from 2003 to 2017 (1-0.2%) but this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of asymptomatic malpositioned screws is unknown, the rate of return to the OR for implant malposition overall in this registry was 1 in 250 patients. Recent data suggest the rate has decreased to 1 in 500 patients. Further work may determine whether enabling technologies can reduce the rate, ideally to a "never event".
PURPOSE: In contrast to infection and curve progression, return to OR for implant malposition is potentially within the surgeon's control. With increasing surgeon familiarity with freehand/fluoroscopic pedicle screw placement, rates of return to OR due to malposition may have decreased over time. We sought to document the incidence and risk factors for return to OR due to screw malposition in a large cohort of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: AIS patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective registry with minimum 2-year follow-up undergoing PSF between 2003 and 2017 were included. Surgeries with the use of intraoperative CT-guided navigation were excluded. Return to OR due to screw malposition over time was tabulated. Lenke class, age at surgery, year of surgery, height, weight, surgeon and site were evaluated. RESULTS: 2435 patients underwent PSF with non-navigated open pedicle screw instrumentation. Mean age was 14.6 years, mean thoracic curve magnitude was 53°, and mean lumbar was 40°. Patients did not routinely undergo intraoperative or postoperative CT evaluation. There were 10 returns to OR for screw malposition at a mean of 0.83 years postoperatively (range 0.1-3.4 years), for an overall incidence of 0.4%. Of the 14 screws, 10 were thoracic, 7 were left-sided. No association was found between screw malposition and curve size, enrolling site, surgeon, BMI, Lenke class, or age. Five patients had radiculopathy which improved after screw revision. Return to OR for screw malposition changed from 2003 to 2017 (1-0.2%) but this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of asymptomatic malpositioned screws is unknown, the rate of return to the OR for implant malposition overall in this registry was 1 in 250 patients. Recent data suggest the rate has decreased to 1 in 500 patients. Further work may determine whether enabling technologies can reduce the rate, ideally to a "never event".
Authors: David W Polly; Benjamin K Potter; Timothy Kuklo; Stewart Young; Chris Johnson; William R Klemme Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Ejovi Ughwanogho; Neeraj M Patel; Keith D Baldwin; Norma Rendon Sampson; John M Flynn Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-04-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Sven K Tschoeke; Patrick Gahr; Lasse Krug; Antje S Kasper; Christoph E Heyde; Wolfgang Ertel Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Scott L Parker; Matthew J McGirt; S Harrison Farber; Anubhav G Amin; Anne-Marie Rick; Ian Suk; Ali Bydon; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Timothy F Witham Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Mario Di Silvestre; Patrizio Parisini; Francesco Lolli; Georgios Bakaloudis Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-07-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Smitha E Mathew; J Blade Hargiss; Todd A Milbrandt; Anthony A Stans; William J Shaughnessy; A Noelle Larson Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2022-05-24
Authors: Antti J Saarinen; Eetu N Suominen; Linda Helenius; Johanna Syvänen; Arimatias Raitio; Ilkka Helenius Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-07-28