Literature DB >> 34741666

Development and validation of a novel 133-plex forensic STR panel (52 STRs and 81 Y-STRs) using single-end 400 bp massive parallel sequencing.

Haoliang Fan1,2,3, Lingxiang Wang1, Changhui Liu2, Xiaoyu Lu1, Xuding Xu1, Kai Ru1, Pingming Qiu2, Chao Liu4, Shao-Qing Wen5.   

Abstract

Short tandem repeats (STRs) are the preferred genetic markers in forensic DNA analysis, routinely measured by capillary electrophoresis (CE) method based on the fragment length features. While, the massive parallel sequencing (MPS) technology could simultaneously target a large number of intriguing forensic STRs, bypassing the intrinsic limitations of amplicon size separation and accessible fluorophores in CE, which is efficient and promising for enabling the identification of forensic biological evidence. Here, we developed a novel MPS-based Forensic Analysis System Multiplecues SetB Kit of 133-plex forensic STR markers (52 STRs and 81 Y-STRs) and one Y-InDel (M175) based on multiplex PCR and single-end 400 bp sequencing strategy. This panel was subjected to developmental validation studies according to the SWGDAM Validation Guidelines. Approximately 2185 MPS-based reactions using 6 human DNA standards and 8 male donors were conducted for substrate studies (filter paper, gauze, cotton swab, four different types of FTA cards, peripheral venous blood, saliva, and exfoliated cells), sensitivity studies (from 2 ng down to 0.0625 ng), mixture studies (two-person DNA mixtures), PCR inhibitor studies (seven commonly encountered PCR inhibitors), species specificity studies (11 non-human species), and repeatability studies. Results of concordance studies (413 Han males and 6 human DNA standards) generated by STRait Razor and in-house Python scripts indicated 99.98% concordance rate in STR calling relative to CE for STRs between 41,900 genotypes at 100 STR markers. Moreover, the limitations of present studies, the nomenclature rules and forensic MPS applications were also described. In conclusion, the validation studies based on ~ 2200 MPS-based and ~ 2500 CE-based DNA profiles demonstrated that the novel MPS-based panel meets forensic DNA quality assurance guidelines with robust, reliable, and reproducible performance on samples of various quantities and qualities, and the STR nomenclature rules should be further regulated to integrate the inconformity between MPS-based and CE-based methods.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forensic genetics; Massive parallel sequencing; Multiplex PCR; Next-generation sequencing; STR; Single-end 400 bp; Validation study; Y-STR

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34741666     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02738-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.791


  88 in total

1.  Application of automated DNA sizing technology for genotyping microsatellite loci.

Authors:  J S Ziegle; Y Su; K P Corcoran; L Nie; P E Mayrand; L B Hoff; L J McBride; M N Kronick; S R Diehl
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 2.  STR allele sequence variation: Current knowledge and future issues.

Authors:  Katherine Butler Gettings; Rachel A Aponte; Peter M Vallone; John M Butler
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 3.  Forensic transcriptome analysis using massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Cordula Haas; Jacqueline Neubauer; Andrea Patrizia Salzmann; Erin Hanson; Jack Ballantyne
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.882

4.  Technical in-depth comparison of two massive parallel DNA-sequencing methods for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from victims of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Emma Adolfsson; Alvida Qvick; Henrik Gréen; Daniel Kling; Cecilia Gunnarsson; Jon Jonasson; Anna Gréen
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.882

5.  Postmortem submersion interval (PMSI) estimation from the microbiome of Sus scrofa bone in a freshwater river.

Authors:  Claire Cartozzo; Tal Simmons; Jenise Swall; Baneshwar Singh
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Ancestry and phenotype predictions from touch DNA using massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Jennifer M Young; D Power; P Kanokwongnuwut; A Linacre
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Current issues for mammalian species identification in forensic science: a review.

Authors:  Chikahiro Mori; Shuichi Matsumura
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  DNA typing with fluorescently tagged short tandem repeats: a sensitive and accurate approach to human identification.

Authors:  C J Frégeau; R M Fourney
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.993

9.  Massively parallel sequencing is unlocking the potential of environmental trace evidence.

Authors:  J M Young; A Linacre
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.882

10.  Retrofitting massively parallel sequencing (MPS) for HLA-DQA1 and polymarker (PM) in forensic casework.

Authors:  Elaine J Lewis; Erin Weaver; Audrey Hoyle; Robert Lagacé; Fabio Oldoni; Daniele Podini
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.686

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and validation of a novel 133-plex forensic STR panel (52 STRs and 81 Y-STRs) using single-end 400 bp massive parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Haoliang Fan; Lingxiang Wang; Changhui Liu; Xiaoyu Lu; Xuding Xu; Kai Ru; Pingming Qiu; Chao Liu; Shao-Qing Wen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.791

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.