Literature DB >> 33157385

Massively parallel sequencing is unlocking the potential of environmental trace evidence.

J M Young1, A Linacre2.   

Abstract

Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) has revolutionised the field of genomics enabling substantial advances in human DNA profiling. Further, the advent of MPS now allows biological signatures to be obtained from complex DNA mixtures and trace amounts of low biomass samples. Environmental samples serve as ideal forms of contact trace evidence as detection at a scene can establish a link between a suspect, location and victim. Many studies have applied MPS technology to characterise the biodiversity within high biomass environmental samples (such as soil and water) to address questions related to ecology, conservation, climate change and human health. However, translation of these tools to forensic science remains in its infancy, due in part to the merging of traditional forensic ecology practices with unfamiliar DNA technologies and complex datasets. In addition, people and objects also carry low biomass environmental signals which have recently been shown to reflect a specific individual or location. The sensitivity, and reducing cost, of MPS is now unlocking the power of both high and low biomass environmental DNA (eDNA) samples as useful sources of genetic information in forensic science. This paper discusses the potential of eDNA to forensic science by reviewing the most explored applications that are leading the integration of this technology into the field. We introduce novel areas of forensic ecology that could also benefit from these tools with a focus on linking a suspect to a scene or establishing provenance of an unknown sample and discuss the current limitations and validation recommendations to achieve translation of eDNA into casework.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Botany; DNA; Forensic; MPS; Metabarcoding; Microbial; Pollen; Soil; Trace evidence

Year:  2020        PMID: 33157385     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  5 in total

Review 1.  Microbiomes in forensic botany: a review.

Authors:  Sarah Ishak; Eleanor Dormontt; Jennifer M Young
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Development and validation of a novel 133-plex forensic STR panel (52 STRs and 81 Y-STRs) using single-end 400 bp massive parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Haoliang Fan; Lingxiang Wang; Changhui Liu; Xiaoyu Lu; Xuding Xu; Kai Ru; Pingming Qiu; Chao Liu; Shao-Qing Wen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.791

Review 3.  Animal Forensic Genetics.

Authors:  Adrian Linacre
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 4.  DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges.

Authors:  Roland A H van Oorschot; Georgina E Meakin; Bas Kokshoorn; Mariya Goray; Bianca Szkuta
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 5.  On the Identification of Body Fluids and Tissues: A Crucial Link in the Investigation and Solution of Crime.

Authors:  Titia Sijen; SallyAnn Harbison
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.