Literature DB >> 34741247

Makeup and Its Application Simulation Affect Women's Self-Perceptions.

Natália Machado Anchieta1, Anthonieta Looman Mafra2, Roberta Tokumori Hokama3, Marco Antonio Correa Varella1, Jailson de Almeida Melo4, Luana Oliveira da Silva1, Caio Santos Alves da Silva1, Jaroslava Varella Valentova1.   

Abstract

Appearance modification is ancient, universal and influences other and self-perceptions. It has been rarely addressed how expectation of appearance modification would affect women's self-perception. We analyzed self-assessments of women without makeup and after having makeup professionally applied at four increasing levels (light, moderate, heavy 1, and heavy 2 makeup). In the simulation phase, women were treated with colorless cosmetics. Fifty Brazilian women (Mage = 24.26 years; SD = 5.53) rated themselves on attractiveness, health, self-esteem, femininity, satisfaction with appearance, age, dominance, confidence, and competence in all experimental conditions. Women in the simulation phase considered themselves more feminine, healthier, and with higher self-esteem than without makeup. In the real makeup phases, these ratings were higher than in the simulation phase. Appearance satisfaction and attractiveness did not differ between simulation and the real makeup phases, both being higher than without makeup. Confidence increased only in real makeup phases, but there was no effect on competence. Thus, real appearance modification and/or an expectation thereof can differently affect specific domains of self-evaluation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appearance; Attractiveness; Cosmetic usage; Self-esteem; Self-evaluation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34741247     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02127-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  14 in total

1.  Why women use makeup: implication of psychological traits in makeup functions.

Authors:  Rodolphe Korichi; Delphine Pelle-de-Queral; Germaine Gazano; Arnaud Aubert
Journal:  J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.948

2.  A sex difference in facial contrast and its exaggeration by cosmetics.

Authors:  Richard Russell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  The evolution of human skin coloration.

Authors:  N G Jablonski; G Chaplin
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.895

4.  Evaluation of quality of life after a medical corrective make-up lesson in patients with various dermatoses.

Authors:  Lucie Peuvrel; Gaëlle Quéreux; Anabelle Brocard; Mélanie Saint-Jean; Céline Vallet; Agnès Mère; Ghislaine Labetoulle; Catherine Le Fol; Brigitte Dréno
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 5.366

5.  Color homogeneity and visual perception of age, health, and attractiveness of female facial skin.

Authors:  Paul J Matts; Bernhard Fink; Karl Grammer; Maria Burquest
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 6.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-06

7.  Facial Cosmetics and Attractiveness: Comparing the Effect Sizes of Professionally-Applied Cosmetics and Identity.

Authors:  Alex L Jones; Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects and Components of Placebos with a Psychological Treatment Rationale - Three Randomized-Controlled Studies.

Authors:  Jens Gaab; Joe Kossowsky; Ulrike Ehlert; Cosima Locher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Examining the 'cosmetics placebo effect'.

Authors:  Carlota Batres; Sarah S Kramer; Caroline G DeAngelis; Richard Russell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quality of Life and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dreher; Carolina Blaya; Juliana L C Tenório; Renato Saltz; Pedro B Ely; Ygor A Ferrão
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-09-15
View more
  3 in total

1.  Response to Commentaries: A Socioevolutionary Approach to Self-Presentation Modification.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-10-28

2.  Makeup and Its Application Simulation Affect Women's Self-Perceptions.

Authors:  Natália Machado Anchieta; Anthonieta Looman Mafra; Roberta Tokumori Hokama; Marco Antonio Correa Varella; Jailson de Almeida Melo; Luana Oliveira da Silva; Caio Santos Alves da Silva; Jaroslava Varella Valentova
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-11-05

3.  The contrasting effects of body image and self-esteem in the makeup usage.

Authors:  Anthonieta Looman Mafra; Caio S A Silva; Marco A C Varella; Jaroslava V Valentova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.