Literature DB >> 19817153

A sex difference in facial contrast and its exaggeration by cosmetics.

Richard Russell1.   

Abstract

This study demonstrates the existence of a sex difference in facial contrast. By measuring carefully controlled photographic images, female faces were shown to have greater luminance contrast between the eyes, lips, and the surrounding skin than did male faces. This sex difference in facial contrast was found to influence the perception of facial gender. An androgynous face can be made to appear female by increasing the facial contrast, or to appear male by decreasing the facial contrast. Application of cosmetics was found to consistently increase facial contrast. Female faces wearing cosmetics had greater facial contrast than the same faces not wearing cosmetics. Female facial beauty is known to be closely linked to sex differences, with femininity considered attractive. These results suggest that cosmetics may function in part by exaggerating a sexually dimorphic attribute-facial contrast-to make the face appear more feminine and hence attractive.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19817153     DOI: 10.1068/p6331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  29 in total

1.  Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images.

Authors:  Richard J W Vernon; Clare A M Sutherland; Andrew W Young; Tom Hartley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Intrinsic fluctuations in sustained attention and distractor processing.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Monica D Rosenberg; Sarah K Noonan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Human colour in mate choice and competition.

Authors:  Hannah M Rowland; Robert P Burriss
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Crossing the 'uncanny valley': adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces.

Authors:  Haiwen Chen; Richard Russell; Ken Nakayama; Margaret Livingstone
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Makeup and Its Application Simulation Affect Women's Self-Perceptions.

Authors:  Natália Machado Anchieta; Anthonieta Looman Mafra; Roberta Tokumori Hokama; Marco Antonio Correa Varella; Jailson de Almeida Melo; Luana Oliveira da Silva; Caio Santos Alves da Silva; Jaroslava Varella Valentova
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-11-05

6.  Facial Cosmetics Exert a Greater Influence on Processing of the Mouth Relative to the Eyes: Evidence from the N170 Event-Related Potential Component.

Authors:  Hideaki Tanaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-05

7.  Asymmetries in infants' attention toward and categorization of male faces: The potential role of experience.

Authors:  Jennifer L Rennels; Andrea J Kayl; Judith H Langlois; Rachel E Davis; Mateusz Orlewicz
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2015-11-06

8.  Biological Sex Determines Whether Faces Look Real.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013

9.  Sexual Dimorphism in Facial Contrast: A Case from Central Africa.

Authors:  Šimon Pokorný; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-08-24

10.  FaReT: A free and open-source toolkit of three-dimensional models and software to study face perception.

Authors:  Jason Hays; Claudia Wong; Fabian A Soto
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.