Literature DB >> 34740452

Open practices in our science and our courtrooms.

Michael D Edge1, Jeanna Neefe Matthews2.   

Abstract

Advocates of transparency in science often point to the benefits of open practices for the scientific process. Here, we focus on a possibly underappreciated effect of standards for transparency: their influence on non-scientific decisions. As a case study, we consider the current state of probabilistic genotyping software in forensics.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  forensic genetics; open practices; open science

Mesh：

Year:  2021        PMID： 34740452      PMCID： PMC9191822          DOI： 10.1016/j.tig.2021.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN： 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.821


  9 in total

1.  EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.

Authors:  Øyvind Bleka; Geir Storvik; Peter Gill
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.882

2.  The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.

Authors:  Duncan Taylor; Jo-Anne Bright; John Buckleton
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 3.  Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.

Authors:  Michael D Coble; Jo-Anne Bright
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 4.882

4.  The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.

Authors:  John S Buckleton; Jo-Anne Bright; Simone Gittelson; Tamyra R Moretti; Anthony J Onorato; Frederick R Bieber; Bruce Budowle; Duncan A Taylor
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 1.832

5.  Validation of probabilistic genotyping software for use in forensic DNA casework: Definitions and illustrations.

Authors:  Hinda Haned; Peter Gill; Kirk Lohmueller; Keith Inman; Norah Rudin
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  An information gap in DNA evidence interpretation.

Authors:  Mark W Perlin; Alexander Sinelnikov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors.

Authors:  David B Allison; Andrew W Brown; Brandon J George; Kathryn A Kaiser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Access and Management: Indigenous Perspectives on Genomic Data Sharing.

Authors:  Nanibaa' A Garrison; Krysta S Barton; Kathryn M Porter; Thyvu Mai; Wylie Burke; Stephanie Russo Carroll
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.006

9.  A manifesto for reproducible science.

Authors:  Marcus R Munafò; Brian A Nosek; Dorothy V M Bishop; Katherine S Button; Christopher D Chambers; Nathalie Percie du Sert; Uri Simonsohn; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Jennifer J Ware; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-01-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.