Literature DB >> 26976468

Validation of probabilistic genotyping software for use in forensic DNA casework: Definitions and illustrations.

Hinda Haned1, Peter Gill2, Kirk Lohmueller3, Keith Inman4, Norah Rudin5.   

Abstract

A number of new computer programs have recently been developed to facilitate the interpretation and statistical weighting of complex DNA profiles in forensic casework. Acceptance of such software in the user community, and subsequent acceptance by the court, relies heavily upon their validation. To date, few guidelines exist that describe the appropriate and sufficient validation of such software used in forensic DNA casework. In this paper, we discuss general principles of software validation and how they could be applied to the interpretation software now being introduced into the forensic community. Importantly, we clarify the relationship between a statistical model and its implementation via software. We use the LRmix program to provide specific examples of how these principles can be implemented.
Copyright © 2015 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Genotyping; LRmix; Likelihood ratio; Probabilistic; Strength of evidence; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26976468     DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Justice        ISSN: 1355-0306            Impact factor:   2.124


  5 in total

1.  MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA.

Authors:  Mitchell M Holland; Teresa M Tiedge; Abigail J Bender; Sidney A Gaston-Sanchez; Jennifer A McElhoe
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Open practices in our science and our courtrooms.

Authors:  Michael D Edge; Jeanna Neefe Matthews
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 11.821

3.  Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.

Authors:  Sho Manabe; Chie Morimoto; Yuya Hamano; Shuntaro Fujimoto; Keiji Tamaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems: EuroForMix, DNAStatistX and STRmix™.

Authors:  Peter Gill; Corina Benschop; John Buckleton; Øyvind Bleka; Duncan Taylor
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.