Literature DB >> 34736911

Disparities in adjuvant treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population.

Logan Corey1, Michele L Cote2, Julie J Ruterbusch3, Alex Vezina4, Ira Winer5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Black women experience worse survival effects with high-grade endometrial cancer. Differences in adjuvant treatment have been proposed to be major contributors to this disparity. However, little is known about the differences in type or timing of adjuvant treatment as it relates to race and ethnicity in the Medicare population.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine patterns of adjuvant therapy and survival for non-Hispanic Black women vs non-Hispanic White women and Hispanic women who have undergone surgery for high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population. STUDY
DESIGN: We used the Medicare-linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify women who underwent surgery as a primary treatment for uterine grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, clear-cell carcinoma, or serous carcinoma between the years 2000 and 2015. Women who did not identify as White or Black race or Hispanic ethnicity were excluded. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for receiving a treatment delay or not receiving adjuvant treatment (compared with those who received adjuvant treatment within 12 weeks) adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics. Overall survival was stratified by race and ethnicity, route of surgery, operative complications, and type and timing of adjuvant therapy, which were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio of death by race and ethnicity adjusted for known predictors and surgical outcomes and adjuvant therapy patterns.
RESULTS: A total of 12,201 women met the study inclusion criteria. Non-Hispanic Black patients had a significantly worse 5-year overall survival than Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients (30.9 months vs 51.0 months vs 53.6 months, respectively). Approximately 632 of 7282 patients (8.6%) who received adjuvant treatment experienced a treatment delay. Delay in treatment of ≥12 weeks was significantly different by race and ethnicity (P=.034), with 12% of Hispanic, 9% of non-Hispanic Black, and 8% of non-Hispanic White women experiencing a delay. After adjustment for the number of complications, age, histology (endometrioid vs nonendometroid), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, marital status, comorbidity count, surgical approach, lymph node dissection, and urban-rural code, Hispanic women had a 71% increased risk of treatment delay (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.38) for all stages of disease. In the same model, non-Hispanic Black race was independently predictive of decreased use of adjuvant treatment for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II and higher (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.68). Non-Hispanic Black race, number of perioperative complications, and nonendometrioid histology were predictive of worse survival in univariate models. Treatment delay was not independently predictive of worse 1- or 5-year survival at any stage.
CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic Black race was predictive of worse 5-year survival across all stages and was associated with omission of adjuvant treatment in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II or higher high-grade endometrial cancer. In unadjusted analyses, patients who experience treatment omission or delay experienced poorer overall survival, but these factors were not independently associated in multivariate analyses. This study suggests that race and ethnicity are independently associated with the type and timing of adjuvant treatment in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer. Further efforts to identify specific causes of barriers to care and timely treatment are imperative.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adjuvant Treatment; high-grade endometrial cancer; racial disparities

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34736911      PMCID: PMC8983438          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  17 in total

1.  Racial disparities in high-risk uterine cancer histologic subtypes: A United States Cancer Statistics study.

Authors:  Mary Kathryn Abel; Cheng-I Liao; Chloe Chan; Danny Lee; Atharva Rohatgi; Kathleen M Darcy; Chunqiao Tian; Amandeep K Mann; George L Maxwell; Daniel S Kapp; John K Chan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Disparities in receipt of care for high-grade endometrial cancer: A National Cancer Data Base analysis.

Authors:  Amy J Bregar; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Ryan Spencer; Joel T Clemmer; John O Schorge; Laurel W Rice; Marcela G Del Carmen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Wui-Jin Koh; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Sarah Bean; Kristin Bradley; Susana M Campos; Kathleen R Cho; Hye Sook Chon; Christina Chu; David Cohn; Marta Ann Crispens; Shari Damast; Oliver Dorigo; Patricia J Eifel; Christine M Fisher; Peter Frederick; David K Gaffney; Suzanne George; Ernest Han; Susan Higgins; Warner K Huh; John R Lurain; Andrea Mariani; David Mutch; Christa Nagel; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Amanda Nickles Fader; Steven W Remmenga; R Kevin Reynolds; Todd Tillmanns; Stefanie Ueda; Emily Wyse; Catheryn M Yashar; Nicole R McMillian; Jillian L Scavone
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Clinical characteristics associated with racial disparities in endometrial cancer outcomes: A surveillance, epidemiology and end results analysis.

Authors:  Shivani Sud; Jordan Holmes; Michael Eblan; Ronald Chen; Ellen Jones
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Ralph G DePalma; Cecilia Mosca; Nancy A Healey; Dharam J Kumbhani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  C L Creutzberg; W L van Putten; P C Koper; M L Lybeert; J J Jobsen; C C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; K A De Winter; L C Lutgens; A C van den Bergh; E van de Steen-Banasik; H Beerman; M van Lent
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-22       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high grade endometrial cancer: a multi-site study performed at high volume cancer centers.

Authors:  Amanda Nickles Fader; Leigh G Seamon; Pedro F Escobar; Heidi E Frasure; Laura A Havrilesky; Kristine M Zanotti; Angeles Alvarez Secord; John F Boggess; David E Cohn; Jeffrey M Fowler; Gregory Skafianos; Emma Rossi; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Disparities in uterine cancer epidemiology, treatment, and survival among African Americans in the United States.

Authors:  B Long; F W Liu; R E Bristow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  N Colombo; C Creutzberg; F Amant; T Bosse; A González-Martín; J Ledermann; C Marth; R Nout; D Querleu; M R Mirza; C Sessa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  The impact of race, comorbid conditions and obesity on survival endpoints in women with high grade endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Juliana Fucinari; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Julie J Ruterbusch; Remonda Khalil; Gregory Dyson; Daniel Shultz; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Michele L Cote
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.