Literature DB >> 28159409

Disparities in receipt of care for high-grade endometrial cancer: A National Cancer Data Base analysis.

Amy J Bregar1, J Alejandro Rauh-Hain1, Ryan Spencer2, Joel T Clemmer1, John O Schorge1, Laurel W Rice2, Marcela G Del Carmen3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine patterns of care and survival for Hispanic women compared to white and African American women with high-grade endometrial cancer.
METHODS: We utilized the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to identify women diagnosed with uterine grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, clear cell carcinoma and papillary serous carcinoma between 2003 and 2011. The effect of treatment on survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: 43,950 women were eligible. African American and Hispanic women had higher rates of stage III and IV disease compared to white women (36.5% vs. 36% vs. 33.5%, p<0.001). African American women were less likely to undergo surgical treatment for their cancer (85.2% vs. 89.8% vs. 87.5%, p<0.001) and were more likely to receive chemotherapy (36.8% vs. 32.4% vs. 32%, p<0.001) compared to white and Hispanic women. Over the entire study period, after adjusting for age, time period of diagnosis, region of the country, urban or rural setting, treating facility type, socioeconomic status, education, insurance, comorbidity index, pathologic stage, histology, lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment, African American women had lower overall survival compared to white women (Hazard Ratio 1.21, 95% CI 1.16-1.26). Conversely, Hispanic women had improved overall survival compared to white women after controlling for the aforementioned factors (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.93).
CONCLUSIONS: Among women with high-grade endometrial cancer, African American women have lower all-cause survival while Hispanic women have higher all-cause survival compared to white women after controlling for treatment, sociodemographic, comorbidity and histopathologic variables.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28159409     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  13 in total

1.  Where you live matters: A National Cancer Database study of Medicaid expansion and endometrial cancer outcomes.

Authors:  David A Barrington; Jennifer A Sinnott; Corinne Calo; David E Cohn; Casey M Cosgrove; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Receipt of adjuvant endometrial cancer treatment according to race: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Study.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; David E Cohn; Theodore M Brasky; Richard Zaino; Kay Park; David G Mutch; William T Creasman; Premal H Thaker; Joan L Walker; Richard G Moore; Shashikant B Lele; Saketh R Guntupalli; Levi S Downs; Christa I Nagel; John F Boggess; Michael L Pearl; Olga B Ioffe; Marcus E Randall; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Rural-urban differences in surgical treatment, regional lymph node examination, and survival in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Katherine S Hyon; Paula Diaz-Sylvester; Sonya R Izadi; Graham A Colditz; Laurent Brard
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Disparities in adjuvant treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Logan Corey; Michele L Cote; Julie J Ruterbusch; Alex Vezina; Ira Winer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  How cancer programs identify and address the financial burdens of rural cancer patients.

Authors:  Victoria Petermann; Whitney E Zahnd; Robin C Vanderpool; Jan M Eberth; Catherine Rohweder; Randall Teal; Maihan Vu; Lindsay Stradtman; Elizabeth Frost; Erika Trapl; Sarah Koopman Gonzalez; Thuy Vu; Linda K Ko; Allison Cole; Paige E Farris; Jackilen Shannon; Jessica Lee; Natoshia Askelson; Laura Seegmiller; Arica White; Jean Edward; Melinda Davis; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.359

6.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Mortality by Stage and Histologic Subtype.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Susan S Devesa; Anne Hammer; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 33.006

7.  Black and Hispanic women are less likely than white women to receive guideline-concordant endometrial cancer treatment.

Authors:  Mara Kaspers; Elyse Llamocca; Allison Quick; Jhalak Dholakia; Ritu Salani; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Uterine Corpus Malignancies in Appalachia Kentucky: Incidence, Survival, and Related Health Disparities.

Authors:  Marian Symmes Johnson; Thomas C Tucker; Quan Chen; Bin Huang; Christopher P DeSimone; Rachel W Miller; Lauren A Baldwin; Tricia I Fredericks; Brian T Burgess; Frederick R Ueland
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Socioeconomic inequality and omission of adjuvant radiation therapy in high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Leo Y Luo; Emeline M Aviki; Anna Lee; Marisa A Kollmeier; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; C Jillian Tsai; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Factors associated with endometrial cancer and hyperplasia among middle-aged and older Hispanics.

Authors:  Ana M Rodriguez; Efstathia Polychronopoulou; Enshuo Hsu; Rahul Shah; Kelly Lamiman; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.