Literature DB >> 34734135

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a cellular allogeneic bone matrix in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease and lumbar spinal instability.

William C Tally1, H Thomas Temple2, J Kenneth Burkus3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cellular allogeneic bone grafts are used as a biologic adjuvant in lumbar spinal fusions. The clinical use of a minimally invasive extreme lateral approach to the lumbar spine has been widely adopted; however, there are few clinical studies that have documented the clinical and radiographic outcomes associated with the use of cellular allografts as an adjunct to fusion in this advanced surgical approach.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 67 patients (34 males and 33 females) with a mean age of 66.8 years (26-85 years) who underwent single- or multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with supplemental posterior segmental spinal fixation using a cellular allogeneic bone matrix as the only bone graft material was retrospectively reviewed by a single surgeon. Patients' preoperative and 3- and 12-month postoperative data were studied. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Standardized clinical outcome measures-36-Item Short Form Surgery (SF-36), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores-were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. An average of 2.25 levels was treated per patient (151 total levels). Fusion status was assessed by dynamic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. The statistical method used to identify the significance of the observed changes in clinical outcomes was the paired 2-sided t-tests. Significance was ascribed to P values <0.05.
RESULTS: Fusion was achieved at 142 levels (142/151; 94%). Eight levels (8/151; 5.3%) showed partial fusions and one patient (single level) had no fusion. In the group of patients with fusions, the mean back and leg pain scores showed improvement from preoperative scores at both 3 and 12 months (P<0.001). Functional outcomes showed similar clinical success in both in SF-36 and ODI scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a cellular allogeneic bone matrix provided osteoconductive and osteoinductive components for successful spine fusions and was associated with statistically significant improvement in SF-36, VAS, and ODI scores. 2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF); cellular allogeneic bone matrix; cellular bone matrix; cellular bone scaffold; degenerative lumbar disc disease

Year:  2021        PMID: 34734135      PMCID: PMC8511570          DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  22 in total

1.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 2.  Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gun Keorochana; Kitipong Setrkraising; Patarawan Woratanarat; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brandon B Carlson; Philip Saville; James Dowdell; Rie Goto; Avani Vaishnav; Catherine Himo Gang; Steven McAnany; Todd J Albert; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): A single-center clinical and radiological follow-up study of 20 patients.

Authors:  Enrico Tessitore; Granit Molliqaj; Karl Schaller; Oliver Pascal Gautschi
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Interbody cage stabilisation in the lumbar spine: biomechanical evaluation of cage design, posterior instrumentation and bone density.

Authors:  T Lund; T R Oxland; B Jost; P Cripton; S Grassmann; C Etter; L P Nolte
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-03

6.  Maintenance of Segmental Lordosis and Disk Height in Stand-alone and Instrumented Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF).

Authors:  Gregory M Malham; Ngaire J Ellis; Rhiannon M Parker; Carl M Blecher; Rohan White; Ben Goss; Kevin A Seex
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; J F Lu; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Christoph P Hofstetter; Guang-Ting Cong; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Andrew R James; Danika Paulo; Eric Elowitz; Roger Härtl
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-04-04

9.  Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Min Li; Ren-Jie Zhang; Cai-Liang Shen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Methods of Cryoprotectant Preservation: Allogeneic Cellular Bone Grafts and Potential Effects.

Authors:  W Blake Martin; Renaud Sicard; Shabnam M Namin; Timothy Ganey
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.