Literature DB >> 28207620

Maintenance of Segmental Lordosis and Disk Height in Stand-alone and Instrumented Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF).

Gregory M Malham1, Ngaire J Ellis, Rhiannon M Parker, Carl M Blecher, Rohan White, Ben Goss, Kevin A Seex.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective single-surgeon nonrandomized clinical study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes, by fixation type, in extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) patients and provide an algorithm for determining patients suitable for stand-alone XLIF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: XLIF may be supplemented with pedicle screw fixation, however, since stabilizing structures remain intact, it is suggested that stand-alone XLIF can be used for certain indications. This eliminates the associated morbidity, though subsidence rates may be elevated, potentially minimizing the clinical benefits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fixation algorithm was developed after evaluation of patient outcomes from the surgeon's first 30 cases. This algorithm was used prospectively for 40 subsequent patients to determine the requirement for supplemental fixation. Preoperative, postoperative, and 12-month follow-up computed tomography scans were measured for segmental and global lumbar lordosis and posterior disk height. Clinical outcome measures included back and leg pain (visual analogue scale), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-36 physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS).
RESULTS: Preoperatively to 12-month follow-up there were increases in segmental lordosis (7.9-9.4 degrees, P=0.0497), lumbar lordosis (48.8-55.2 degrees, P=0.0328), and disk height (3.7-5.5 mm, P=0.0018); there were also improvements in back (58.6%) and leg pain (60.0%), ODI (44.4%), PCS (56.7%), and MCS (16.1%) for stand-alone XLIF. For instrumented XLIF, segmental lordosis (7.6-10.5 degrees, P=0.0120) and disk height (3.5-5.6 mm, P<0.001) increased, while lumbar lordosis decreased (51.1-45.8 degrees, P=0.2560). Back (49.8%) and leg pain (30.8%), ODI (32.3%), PCS (37.4%), and MCS (2.0%) were all improved. Subsidence occurred in 3 (7.5%) stand-alone patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The XLIF treatment fixation algorithm provided a clinical pathway to select suitable patients for stand-alone XLIF. These patients achieved positive clinical outcomes, satisfactory fusion rates, with sustained correction of lordosis and restoration of disk height.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28207620     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aa4c94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  31 in total

Review 1.  [Extreme lateral interbody fusion. Indication, surgical technique, outcomes and specific complications].

Authors:  Markus Quante; Henry Halm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  An Algorithm to Predict Success of Indirect Decompression Using the Extreme Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedure.

Authors:  Brandon C Gabel; Reid Hoshide; William Taylor
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-09-08

Review 3.  The role of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion in sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity.

Authors:  Giuseppe Costanzo; Carmine Zoccali; Philip Maykowski; Christina M Walter; Jesse Skoch; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Kevin Phan; Greg Malham; Kevin Seex; Prashanth J Rao
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

5.  Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gregory M Malham; Rhiannon M Parker; Ben Goss; Carl M Blecher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison of pure lateral and oblique lateral inter-body fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disk disease: a multicentric cohort study.

Authors:  Massimo Miscusi; Alessandro Ramieri; Stefano Forcato; Mary Giuffrè; Sokol Trungu; Marco Cimatti; Alessandro Pesce; Pietro Familiari; Amedeo Piazza; Cristina Carnevali; Giuseppe Costanzo; Antonino Raco
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of a calcium phosphate bone substitute with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of fusion rates, clinical outcomes and complications with 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Rhiannon M Parker; Gregory M Malham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Outcomes of direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) in an Australian cohort.

Authors:  Daniel B Scherman; Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan; Sean F Mungovan; Kenneth Faulder; Gordon Dandie
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-03

9.  Mini-Open Access for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Stephan N Salzmann; Gary A Fantini; Ichiro Okano; Andrew A Sama; Alexander P Hughes; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-11-01

10.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in a lateral decubitus position: technique and outcomes in obese patients.

Authors:  Gregory M Malham; Timothy P Wagner; Matthew H Claydon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.