Literature DB >> 34733096

Health-Related Quality of Life and Toxicity After Definitive High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Among Veterans With Prostate Cancer.

Alexander A Harris1, Mayuri Yasuda1, Megan S Wu1, Jacqueline M Deirmenjian1, Ahmer Farooq1, Kristin G Baldea1, Robert Flanigan1, Matthew M Harkenrider1, James S Welsh1, Abhishek A Solanki1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for prostate cancer. There is limited research, however, investigating toxicity outcomes with HDRBT treatment among veterans. The objective of this study is to assess the impact on health-related quality of life (hrQOL) and physician-graded toxicities associated with HDRBT as monotherapy among veterans treated at Edward Hines, Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital in Hines, Illinois.
METHODS: Between 2016 and 2019, 74 veterans with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with HDRBT as monotherapy with 27 Gy in 2 fractions, delivered over 2 implants. Veteran-reported hrQOL in the genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual domains was assessed using the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. Mixed linear effect models were used to assess differences in the hrQOL scores at follow-up compared with baseline scores. Statistically significant differences in hrQOL scores from baseline were further assessed for clinical significance, using minimal clinically important difference (MCID) evaluations.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18 months. Veterans reported declines in GU, GI, and sexual hrQOL scores immediately after treatment, with the IPSS and EPIC-26 hrQOL scores all displaying significant decrease from baseline over time. The majority of the declines in hrQOL scores met criteria for MCID. These hrQOL scores trended toward a return to baseline, with the EPIC-26 urinary obstruction score returning to baseline at the 18-month follow-up assessment and the EPIC-26 bowel score returning to baseline at the 12-month follow-up. The IPSS, urinary incontinence, and sexual scores did not return to baseline at 18 months. The grade 2 maximum physician-graded GU, GI, and sexual toxicity rates were 65%, 5%, and 53%, respectively. There was 1 incidence of grade 3 GU toxicity but no grade 3 GI or sexual toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: HDRBT as monotherapy is a well-tolerated treatment option for veterans with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with favorable veteran-reported and physician-graded toxicities. Veterans should be educated about HDRBT as an option when counseled regarding treatment for localized prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2021 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34733096      PMCID: PMC8560122          DOI: 10.12788/fp.0147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fed Pract        ISSN: 1078-4497


  16 in total

1.  Factors associated with initial therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prostate cancer outcomes study.

Authors:  L C Harlan; A Potosky; F D Gilliland; R Hoffman; P C Albertsen; A S Hamilton; J W Eley; J L Stanford; R A Stephenson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-12-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients.

Authors:  Anna E McGlothlin; Roger J Lewis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Cancer Incidence Among Patients of the U.S. Veterans Affairs Health Care System: 2010 Update.

Authors:  Leah L Zullig; Kellie J Sims; Rebecca McNeil; Christina D Williams; George L Jackson; Dawn Provenzale; Michael J Kelley
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 4.  HDR Prostate Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Juanita Crook; Marina Marbán; Deidre Batchelar
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.934

5.  Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Rodney L Dunn; Martin G Sanda; Peter Chang; Thomas K Greenfield; Mark S Litwin; John T Wei
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Are patients at Veterans Affairs medical centers sicker? A comparative analysis of health status and medical resource use.

Authors:  Z Agha; R P Lofgren; J V VanRuiswyk; P M Layde
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-11-27

7.  Early toxicity and health-related quality of life results of high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marc Gaudet; Mathieu Pharand-Charbonneau; Marie-Pierre Desrosiers; Debbie Wright; Alain Haddad
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Prostate cancer survivorship care in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2014-08

9.  Factors influencing prostate cancer patterns of care: An analysis of treatment variation using the SEER database.

Authors:  Lindsay M Burt; Dennis C Shrieve; Jonathan D Tward
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-01-31

10.  Transitioning From a Low-Dose-Rate to a High-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Program: Comparing Initial Dosimetry and Improving Workflow Efficiency Through Targeted Interventions.

Authors:  Abhishek A Solanki; Michael L Mysz; Rakesh Patel; Murat Surucu; Hyejoo Kang; Ahpa Plypoo; Amishi Bajaj; Mark Korpics; Brendan Martin; Courtney Hentz; Gopal Gupta; Ahmer Farooq; Kristin G Baldea; Julius Pawlowski; John Roeske; Robert Flanigan; William Small; Matthew M Harkenrider
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.