Literature DB >> 29482918

Early toxicity and health-related quality of life results of high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Marc Gaudet1, Mathieu Pharand-Charbonneau2, Marie-Pierre Desrosiers2, Debbie Wright2, Alain Haddad3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the acute toxicity and effect on health-related quality of life of a two-fraction regimen of high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy in two implants of 13.5 Gy spaced 7-14 days apart. Patients completed International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, and 24 months after brachytherapy. Proportion of patients in each IPSS category (mild = 0-7, moderate = 8-18, severe = 19+) was evaluated at each of the intervals above. Paired t tests with baseline values were done for IPSS and EPIC scores.
RESULTS: Thirty patients were accrued to the study. Median prostate-specific antigen was 8,7 (range 4.1-17.5). T stages were T1c = 65%, T2a = 21%, and T2b = 14%. Twenty-seven percent of patients had a Gleason score of 6 and 73% had a Gleason score of 7. IPSS categories at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were mild (81%, 43%, 58%, 62%, 76%, 64%), moderate (19%, 32%, 29%, 30%, 20%, 29%), and severe (0%, 25%, 13%, 7%, 4%, 6%), respectively. There was a significant decrease in EPIC sexual summary scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of 0 points (p < 0.001), 17 points (p = 0.01), 18 points (p = 0.02), and 17 points (p = 0.01), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of this cohort of patients treated with two-fraction HDR monotherapy. This regimen shows rates of toxicity and health-related quality of life that appear acceptable as compared to other treatment modalities. These results are also comparable with other reports with similar treatment regimens. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachytherapy; HDR; Health-related quality of life; Monotherapy; Prostate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29482918     DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brachytherapy        ISSN: 1538-4721            Impact factor:   2.362


  3 in total

1.  Health-Related Quality of Life and Toxicity After Definitive High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Among Veterans With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander A Harris; Mayuri Yasuda; Megan S Wu; Jacqueline M Deirmenjian; Ahmer Farooq; Kristin G Baldea; Robert Flanigan; Matthew M Harkenrider; James S Welsh; Abhishek A Solanki
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-08

2.  Patient and physician reported toxicity with two-fraction definitive high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: the impact of implant interval.

Authors:  Alexander A Harris; Mark Korpics; Zohaib Sherwani; Ahmer Farooq; Kristin G Baldea; Robert Flanigan; Matthew M Harkenrider; Abhishek A Solanki
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-06-30

3.  Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy planning: The impact on patient-reported health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Alexander A Harris; Megan Wu; Jacqueline M Deirmenjian; Steven M Shea; Hyejoo Kang; Rakesh Patel; Derek Fielder; Michael L Mysz; Matthew M Harkenrider; Abhishek A Solanki
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.