Literature DB >> 30369784

Prostate cancer survivorship care in the Veterans Health Administration.

Ted A Skolarus1,2,3, Sarah T Hawley3,4.   

Abstract

The burden of prostate cancer among Veterans is substantial with over 200,000 survivors and 12,000 new diagnoses annually. Most men live with rather than die from this common and expensive disease making prostate cancer survivorship care especially important. In addition, the symptom burden after prostate cancer treatment can be substantial, last well into survivorship and lead to reduced quality of life and greater use of services. For these reasons, it is increasingly recognized that cancer survivorship care is similar to chronic disease management in requiring a combination of primary care providers and cancer specialists to deliver care over long periods of time. Because of its leadership in chronic disease care and the proportion of older men served, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is well positioned to become one of the national leaders in prostate cancer survivorship care. However, best practices and portfolios of quality indicators for prostate cancer survivorship care remain underdeveloped. More broadly, there is a limited consensus about who (primary care providers or prostate cancer specialists - urologists, radiation and medical oncologists) has primary responsibility for prostate cancer surveillance, and who manages the often substantial and lingering treatment-related side effects. Unclear roles and regional variation in the VHA cancer specialist workforce also complicate delivery of quality survivorship care. Ultimately, the design and implementation of tools to facilitate the delivery of optimal cancer survivorship care in VHA rests upon understanding how responsibility for survivorship care is managed and the barriers to quality survivorship care. Due to the expanding population of Veteran prostate cancer survivors, improving their quality of survivorship care through effective use of the VHA's provider workforce and latest telemedicine initiatives has potential to transform the national efficiency and effectiveness of cancer specialty care delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate cancer; implementation; quality improvement; survivorship; symptoms; veteran

Year:  2014        PMID: 30369784      PMCID: PMC6201257     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fed Pract        ISSN: 1078-4497


  82 in total

1.  Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Charles L Bosk; Emma Louise Aveling; Christine A Goeschel; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Understanding fragmentation of prostate cancer survivorship care: implications for cost and quality.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Yun Zhang; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.

Authors:  Eva Johansson; Gunnar Steineck; Lars Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Tommy Nyberg; Mirja Ruutu; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Cancer survivors--United States, 2007.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Primary care perspectives on prostate cancer survivorship: implications for improving quality of care.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Laurel L Northouse; Angela Fagerlin; Carol Garlinghouse; Raymond Y Demers; David R Rovner; May Darwish-Yassine; John T Wei
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 6.  Management of complications of prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  M Dror Michaelson; Shane E Cotter; Patricio C Gargollo; Anthony L Zietman; Douglas M Dahl; Matthew R Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Survivorship: adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.907

8.  Advancing survivorship care through the National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center: developing American Cancer Society guidelines for primary care providers.

Authors:  Rebecca Cowens-Alvarado; Katherine Sharpe; Mandi Pratt-Chapman; Anne Willis; Ted Gansler; Patricia A Ganz; Stephen B Edge; Mary S McCabe; Kevin Stein
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Melissa C Brouwers; Valerie A Palda; Louise Lemieux-Charles; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  A systematic exploration of differences in contextual factors related to implementing the MOVE! weight management program in VA: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David E Goodrich; Claire H Robinson; Carol E Fletcher; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Current use of telehealth in urology: a review.

Authors:  Peris Castaneda; Chad Ellimoottil
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Bone Health in Patients With Prostate Cancer: An Evidence-Based Algorithm.

Authors:  Eric D Johnson; Katerina Butler; Sumati Gupta
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-08

3.  Health-Related Quality of Life and Toxicity After Definitive High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Among Veterans With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander A Harris; Mayuri Yasuda; Megan S Wu; Jacqueline M Deirmenjian; Ahmer Farooq; Kristin G Baldea; Robert Flanigan; Matthew M Harkenrider; James S Welsh; Abhishek A Solanki
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-08

4.  Factors Associated with Osteoporosis Management Among Veterans Who Received Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Samantha L Solimeo; Brian C Lund; Kimberly D McCoy; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin; Richard Hoffman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Determinants of quality prostate cancer survivorship care across the primary and specialty care interface: Lessons from the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Archana Radhakrishnan; Jennifer Henry; Kevin Zhu; Sarah T Hawley; Brent K Hollenbeck; Timothy Hofer; Daniela A Wittmann; Anne E Sales; Ted A Skolarus
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Economic Outcomes in Patients with Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone.

Authors:  Krishnan Ramaswamy; Stanislav Lechpammer; Jack Mardekian; Ahong Huang; Neil M Schultz; Rickard Sandin; Li Wang; Onur Baser; Daniel J George
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Survival outcomes in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate.

Authors:  Scott T Tagawa; Krishnan Ramaswamy; Ahong Huang; Jack Mardekian; Neil M Schultz; Li Wang; Rickard Sandin; Stanislav Lechpammer; Daniel J George
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 5.455

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.