Literature DB >> 34729681

Spherical coordinates transformation pre-processing in Deep Convolution Neural Networks for brain tumor segmentation in MRI.

Carlo Russo1, Sidong Liu2,3, Antonio Di Ieva2.   

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is used in everyday clinical practice to assess brain tumors. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNN) have recently shown very promising results in brain tumor segmentation tasks; however, DCNN models fail the task when applied to volumes that are different from the training dataset. One of the reasons is due to the lack of data standardization to adjust for different models and MR machines. In this work, a 3D spherical coordinates transform during the pre-processing phase has been hypothesized to improve DCNN models' accuracy and to allow more generalizable results even when the model is trained on small and heterogeneous datasets and translated into different domains. Indeed, the spherical coordinate system avoids several standardization issues since it works independently of resolution and imaging settings. The model trained on spherical transform pre-processed inputs resulted in superior performance over the Cartesian-input trained model on predicting gliomas' segmentation on Tumor Core and Enhancing Tumor classes, achieving a further improvement in accuracy by merging the two models together. The proposed model is not resolution-dependent, thus improving segmentation accuracy and theoretically solving some transfer learning problems related to the domain shifting, at least in terms of image resolution in the datasets.
© 2021. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain tumor; Deep Convolutional Neural Network; MRI segmentation; Spherical coordinates

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34729681     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02464-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  26 in total

1.  Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.

Authors:  Harold L Kundel; Calvin F Nodine; Emily F Conant; Susan P Weinstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  The radiology task: Bayesian theory and perception.

Authors:  T Donovan; D J Manning
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Radiology: Opportunities, Challenges, Pitfalls, and Criteria for Success.

Authors:  James H Thrall; Xiang Li; Quanzheng Li; Cinthia Cruz; Synho Do; Keith Dreyer; James Brink
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Perceptual skill, radiology expertise, and visual test performance with NINA and WALDO.

Authors:  C F Nodine; E A Krupinski
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  A Road Map for Translational Research on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: From the 2018 National Institutes of Health/RSNA/ACR/The Academy Workshop.

Authors:  Bibb Allen; Steven E Seltzer; Curtis P Langlotz; Keith P Dreyer; Ronald M Summers; Nicholas Petrick; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Marisa Cruz; Tarik K Alkasab; Robert J Hanisch; Wendy J Nilsen; Judy Burleson; Kevin Lyman; Krishna Kandarpa
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images.

Authors:  H L Kundel; P S La Follette
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A visual concept shapes image perception.

Authors:  H L Kundel; C F Nodine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety.

Authors:  Robert Challen; Joshua Denny; Martin Pitt; Luke Gompels; Tom Edwards; Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 9.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS).

Authors:  Bjoern H Menze; Andras Jakab; Stefan Bauer; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani; Justin Kirby; Yuliya Burren; Nicole Porz; Johannes Slotboom; Roland Wiest; Levente Lanczi; Elizabeth Gerstner; Marc-André Weber; Tal Arbel; Brian B Avants; Nicholas Ayache; Patricia Buendia; D Louis Collins; Nicolas Cordier; Jason J Corso; Antonio Criminisi; Tilak Das; Hervé Delingette; Çağatay Demiralp; Christopher R Durst; Michel Dojat; Senan Doyle; Joana Festa; Florence Forbes; Ezequiel Geremia; Ben Glocker; Polina Golland; Xiaotao Guo; Andac Hamamci; Khan M Iftekharuddin; Raj Jena; Nigel M John; Ender Konukoglu; Danial Lashkari; José Antonió Mariz; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Doina Precup; Stephen J Price; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Syed M S Reza; Michael Ryan; Duygu Sarikaya; Lawrence Schwartz; Hoo-Chang Shin; Jamie Shotton; Carlos A Silva; Nuno Sousa; Nagesh K Subbanna; Gabor Szekely; Thomas J Taylor; Owen M Thomas; Nicholas J Tustison; Gozde Unal; Flor Vasseur; Max Wintermark; Dong Hye Ye; Liang Zhao; Binsheng Zhao; Darko Zikic; Marcel Prastawa; Mauricio Reyes; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  The effect of expertise on eye movement behaviour in medical image perception.

Authors:  Raymond Bertram; Laura Helle; Johanna K Kaakinen; Erkki Svedström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance image-based brain tumour segmentation methods: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jayendra M Bhalodiya; Sarah N Lim Choi Keung; Theodoros N Arvanitis
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-03-16

2.  Machine learning analysis on the impacts of COVID-19 on India's renewable energy transitions and air quality.

Authors:  Thompson Stephan; Fadi Al-Turjman; Monica Ravishankar; Punitha Stephan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.190

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.