Literature DB >> 34727272

Does the Ring Work? Perceptions and Understanding of the Efficacy of a Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV Prevention Amongst Women in a Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Juliane Etima1, Ariana W K Katz2, Zoe Duby3, Morgan Garcia4, Thesla Palanee-Phillips5, Krishnaveni Reddy5, Florence Mathebula5, Chifundo Zimba6, Leila E Mansoor7, Devika Singh8, Elmah Manengamambo9, Sarita Naidoo10,11, Lydia Soto-Torres12, Elizabeth T Montgomery2.   

Abstract

As demonstrated by the Phase III clinical trial, MTN-020/ASPIRE, the monthly dapivirine vaginal ring is well tolerated and reduces the risk of HIV-1 as a woman-initiated prevention option. This analysis uses data from the follow-on MTN-032/Assessment of ASPIRE and HOPE Adherence (AHA) qualitative study to understand how perceptions (or misperceptions) of ring efficacy may have influenced behavior during ASPIRE, and affected intention to use the ring in future ring projects, specifically HOPE, the planned open-label extension study. Single in-depth interviews (n = 98) and 12 focus group discussions (n = 89) were conducted with women at seven sites in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe. Eligibility included participation in the ASPIRE active arm, and ring use for ≥ 3 months or at least 1 month if seroconversion occurred. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed into English, coded in Dedoose and thematically analyzed. Demographic and behavioral questionnaire data were summarized in Stata. Most AHA participants perceived the ring to be effective, and described simply trusting it or having confidence in it because they, or other participants in risky situations, remained HIV-uninfected. Participants described ring efficacy after receiving ASPIRE results as a binary assessment: the ring worked or not. Many did not remember exact efficacy percentages because of lack of comprehension or memory but recalled key details about age differences. The majority expressed interest in future ring use. There is a need to investigate improved ways of explaining placebo-controlled trials and efficacy to women in Sub-Saharan Africa. Now that ring efficacy, is known, these benefits must be well communicated, and understood by end-users and key stakeholders. Engagement with end-users to construct effective messages and to develop tools to measure understanding of partial efficacy will be essential.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dapivirine vaginal ring; Efficacy; Perceptions; Understanding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34727272      PMCID: PMC9007827          DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03512-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Behav        ISSN: 1090-7165


  24 in total

1.  The preventive misconception: experiences from CAPRISA 004.

Authors:  Rachael C Dellar; Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Leila E Mansoor; Anneke Grobler; Hilton Humphries; Lise Werner; Fanelesibonge Ntombela; Londiwe Luthuli; Salim S Abdool Karim
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-09

2.  Evaluation of an intervention among adolescents to reduce preventive misconception in HIV vaccine clinical trials.

Authors:  Michelle Lally; Richard Goldsworthy; Moussa Sarr; Jessica Kahn; Larry Brown; Ligia Peralta; Gregory Zimet
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Explaining the Efficacy of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention: A Qualitative Study of Message Framing and Messaging Preferences Among US Men Who have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Kristen Underhill; Kathleen M Morrow; Christopher Colleran; Sarah K Calabrese; Don Operario; Peter Salovey; Kenneth H Mayer
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2016-07

4.  Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana.

Authors:  Michael C Thigpen; Poloko M Kebaabetswe; Lynn A Paxton; Dawn K Smith; Charles E Rose; Tebogo M Segolodi; Faith L Henderson; Sonal R Pathak; Fatma A Soud; Kata L Chillag; Rodreck Mutanhaurwa; Lovemore Ian Chirwa; Michael Kasonde; Daniel Abebe; Evans Buliva; Roman J Gvetadze; Sandra Johnson; Thom Sukalac; Vasavi T Thomas; Clyde Hart; Jeffrey A Johnson; C Kevin Malotte; Craig W Hendrix; John T Brooks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women.

Authors:  Jared M Baeten; Deborah Donnell; Patrick Ndase; Nelly R Mugo; James D Campbell; Jonathan Wangisi; Jordan W Tappero; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Elly Katabira; Allan Ronald; Elioda Tumwesigye; Edwin Were; Kenneth H Fife; James Kiarie; Carey Farquhar; Grace John-Stewart; Aloysious Kakia; Josephine Odoyo; Akasiima Mucunguzi; Edith Nakku-Joloba; Rogers Twesigye; Kenneth Ngure; Cosmas Apaka; Harrison Tamooh; Fridah Gabona; Andrew Mujugira; Dana Panteleeff; Katherine K Thomas; Lara Kidoguchi; Meighan Krows; Jennifer Revall; Susan Morrison; Harald Haugen; Mira Emmanuel-Ogier; Lisa Ondrejcek; Robert W Coombs; Lisa Frenkel; Craig Hendrix; Namandjé N Bumpus; David Bangsberg; Jessica E Haberer; Wendy S Stevens; Jairam R Lingappa; Connie Celum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Male Partner Influence on Women's HIV Prevention Trial Participation and Use of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: the Importance of "Understanding".

Authors:  Elizabeth T Montgomery; Ariane van der Straten; Jonathan Stadler; Miriam Hartmann; Busisiwe Magazi; Florence Mathebula; Nicole Laborde; Lydia Soto-Torres
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2015-05

7.  Preventive misconception and adolescents' knowledge about HIV vaccine trials.

Authors:  Mary A Ott; Andreia B Alexander; Michelle Lally; John B Steever; Gregory D Zimet
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Kachit Choopanya; Michael Martin; Pravan Suntharasamai; Udomsak Sangkum; Philip A Mock; Manoj Leethochawalit; Sithisat Chiamwongpaet; Praphan Kitisin; Pitinan Natrujirote; Somyot Kittimunkong; Rutt Chuachoowong; Roman J Gvetadze; Janet M McNicholl; Lynn A Paxton; Marcel E Curlin; Craig W Hendrix; Suphak Vanichseni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The importance of male partner involvement for women's acceptability and adherence to female-initiated HIV prevention methods in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Montgomery; Ariane van der Straten; Agnes Chidanyika; Tsungai Chipato; Shabbar Jaffar; Nancy Padian
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2011-07

Review 10.  Motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, biomedical HIV prevention products in sub-Saharan Africa: an adapted meta-ethnography.

Authors:  Robyn Eakle; Adam Bourne; Caitlin Jarrett; Jonathan Stadler; Heidi Larson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  Integrating Gender-Based Violence Screening and Support into the Research Clinic Setting: Experiences from an HIV Prevention Open-Label Extension Trial in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Morgan Garcia; Sarah T Roberts; Ashley J Mayo; Rachel Scheckter; Leila E Mansoor; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Krishnaveni Reddy; Yuthika Naidoo; Carolyne Agwau Akello; Zakir Gaffoor; Samantha Siva; Chenai Rushwaya; Kudzai Hlahla; Jane Jambaya; Rujeko Makoni; Evans Kachale; Margret Ndovie; Jabulisile Zuma; Elizabeth T Montgomery
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2022-09-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.