Literature DB >> 22784038

Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana.

Michael C Thigpen1, Poloko M Kebaabetswe, Lynn A Paxton, Dawn K Smith, Charles E Rose, Tebogo M Segolodi, Faith L Henderson, Sonal R Pathak, Fatma A Soud, Kata L Chillag, Rodreck Mutanhaurwa, Lovemore Ian Chirwa, Michael Kasonde, Daniel Abebe, Evans Buliva, Roman J Gvetadze, Sandra Johnson, Thom Sukalac, Vasavi T Thomas, Clyde Hart, Jeffrey A Johnson, C Kevin Malotte, Craig W Hendrix, John T Brooks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preexposure prophylaxis with antiretroviral agents has been shown to reduce the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among men who have sex with men; however, the efficacy among heterosexuals is uncertain.
METHODS: We randomly assigned HIV-seronegative men and women to receive either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF-FTC) or matching placebo once daily. Monthly study visits were scheduled, and participants received a comprehensive package of prevention services, including HIV testing, counseling on adherence to medication, management of sexually transmitted infections, monitoring for adverse events, and individualized counseling on risk reduction; bone mineral density testing was performed semiannually in a subgroup of participants.
RESULTS: A total of 1219 men and women underwent randomization (45.7% women) and were followed for 1563 person-years (median, 1.1 years; maximum, 3.7 years). Because of low retention and logistic limitations, we concluded the study early and followed enrolled participants through an orderly study closure rather than expanding enrollment. The TDF-FTC group had higher rates of nausea (18.5% vs. 7.1%, P<0.001), vomiting (11.3% vs. 7.1%, P=0.008), and dizziness (15.1% vs. 11.0%, P=0.03) than the placebo group, but the rates of serious adverse events were similar (P=0.90). Participants who received TDF-FTC, as compared with those who received placebo, had a significant decline in bone mineral density. K65R, M184V, and A62V resistance mutations developed in 1 participant in the TDF-FTC group who had had an unrecognized acute HIV infection at enrollment. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis that included the 33 participants who became infected during the study (9 in the TDF-FTC group and 24 in the placebo group; 1.2 and 3.1 infections per 100 person-years, respectively), the efficacy of TDF-FTC was 62.2% (95% confidence interval, 21.5 to 83.4; P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Daily TDF-FTC prophylaxis prevented HIV infection in sexually active heterosexual adults. The long-term safety of daily TDF-FTC prophylaxis, including the effect on bone mineral density, remains unknown. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health; TDF2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00448669.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22784038     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  985 in total

1.  HIV preexposure prophylaxis in the real world.

Authors:  Demetre C Daskalakis
Journal:  Top Antivir Med       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

2.  Medication adherence among men who have sex with men at risk for HIV infection in the United States: implications for pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation.

Authors:  Albert Y Liu; Nancy A Hessol; Eric Vittinghoff; K Rivet Amico; Elizabeth Kroboth; Jonathan Fuchs; Risha Irvin; R Craig Sineath; Travis Sanchez; Patrick S Sullivan; Susan P Buchbinder
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.078

3.  Will risk compensation accompany pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV?

Authors:  Jill Blumenthal; Richard H Haubrich
Journal:  Virtual Mentor       Date:  2014-11-01

4.  Examining the role of serostatus disclosure on unprotected sex among people living with HIV.

Authors:  Sarahmona Przybyla; Carol Golin; Laura Widman; Catherine Grodensky; Jo Anne Earp; Chirayath Suchindran
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.078

5.  HIV Care Providers' Intentions to Prescribe and Actual Prescription of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis to At-Risk Adolescents and Adults.

Authors:  Tanya L Kowalczyk Mullins; Gregory Zimet; Michelle Lally; Jiahong Xu; Sarah Thornton; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.078

Review 6.  Engaging healthcare providers to implement HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Authors:  Douglas Krakower; Kenneth H Mayer
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 7.  Next-generation oral preexposure prophylaxis: beyond tenofovir.

Authors:  Bisrat K Abraham; Roy Gulick
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 8.  Antiretrovirals and safer conception for HIV-serodiscordant couples.

Authors:  Lynn T Matthews; Jennifer A Smit; Susan Cu-Uvin; Deborah Cohan
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 9.  Helping our patients take HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): a systematic review of adherence interventions.

Authors:  J L Marcus; T Buisker; T Horvath; K R Amico; J D Fuchs; S P Buchbinder; R M Grant; A Y Liu
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.180

10.  An intravaginal ring for the sustained delivery of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Authors:  Marc M Baum; Irina Butkyavichene; Scott A Churchman; Gilbert Lopez; Christine S Miller; Thomas J Smith; John A Moss
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.