Literature DB >> 34725775

The influence of time structure on prediction motion in visual and auditory modalities.

Kuiyuan Qin1,2, Wenxiang Chen1,2,3, Jiayu Cui1,2, Xiaoyu Zeng1,2, Ying Li1,2, Yuan Li4,5, Xuqun You6,7.   

Abstract

Usually people can estimate the correct position of a moving object even when it temporarily moves behind an occlusion. Studies have been performed on this type of occluded motion with prediction motion (PM) tasks in the laboratory. Previous publications have emphasized that people could use mental imagery or apply an oculomotor system to estimate the arrival of a moving stimulus at the target place. Nevertheless, these two ways cannot account for the performance difference under a different set of conditions. Our study tested the role of time structure in a time-to-collision (TTC) task using visual and auditory modalities. In the visual condition, the moving red bar travelled from left to right and was invisible during the entire course but flashed at the initial and the occluded points. The auditory condition and visual condition were alike, except that the flashes in the visual condition were changed to clicks at the initial and the occluded points. The results illustrated that participants' performance was better in the equal time structure condition. The comparison between the two sense modalities demonstrated a similar tendency, which suggested there could be common cognitive processes between visual and auditory modalities when participants took advantage of temporal cues to judge TTC.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory modality; PM task; Time structure; Time to contact; Visual modality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34725775     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02369-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.157


  32 in total

Review 1.  Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull; Ruey-Kuang Cheng; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Judging the contact-times of multiple objects: Evidence for asymmetric interference.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; Daniel Oberfeld; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-04-27

3.  Eye movements influence estimation of time-to-contact in prediction motion.

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Robin Baures; Heiko Hecht; Nicolas Benguigui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI.

Authors:  Jt Coull; Ac Nobre
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Temporal-range estimation of multiple objects: evidence for an early bottleneck.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; Daniel Oberfeld; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-03-26

6.  Can Stroboscopic Training Improve Judgments of Time-to-Collision?

Authors:  Adam M Braly; Patricia R DeLucia
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Auditory and temporal factors in the modality effect.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Availability of attention affects time-to-contact estimation.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; François Maquestiaux; Patricia R DeLucia; Alexis Defer; Elise Prigent
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Cognitive processes involved in smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  G R Barnes
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Combined smooth and saccadic ocular pursuit during the transient occlusion of a moving visual object.

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Graham R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.