Literature DB >> 29713757

Availability of attention affects time-to-contact estimation.

Robin Baurès1, François Maquestiaux2, Patricia R DeLucia3, Alexis Defer4, Elise Prigent5.   

Abstract

To estimate the time-to-contact (TTC) of a moving object, numerous studies have focused on the type of information or gaze strategy used by the observer. However, it remains to be determined whether and how attention could affect TTC estimation. In particular, how does TTC estimation operate when less attention is available? To answer this question, we conducted two experiments in which the participants had to perform an absolute (Experiment 1) or relative (Experiment 2) prediction-motion task, either alone (i.e., in single-task condition) or along with a secondary, visual working-memory task (i.e., in dual-task condition). In both experiments, we found that TTC estimation was superior in dual-task condition relative to single-task condition. This finding suggests that the reduction of available attention actually improves TTC estimation. We discuss possible explanations as well as theoretical implications for this seemingly counter-intuitive finding. Further research is needed to investigate if (in)attention facilitates or only shifts TTC estimation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Dual task; Prediction motion; Time-to-contact estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29713757     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5273-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Gianfranco Bosco; Vincenzo Maffei; Marco Iosa; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Limited attention facilitates coherent motion processing.

Authors:  Isamu Motoyoshi; Taichi Ishii; Miyuki G Kamachi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention.

Authors:  Joel Lachter; Kenneth I Forster; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-04

5.  The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Time and cognitive load in working memory.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Sophie Bernardin; Sophie Portrat; Evie Vergauwe; Valérie Camos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion task.

Authors:  P R DeLucia; G W Liddell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks.

Authors:  J R Tresilian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

9.  Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: some things are better left unsaid.

Authors:  J W Schooler; T Y Engstler-Schooler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.

Authors:  Daniël Lakens
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  The influence of time structure on prediction motion in visual and auditory modalities.

Authors:  Kuiyuan Qin; Wenxiang Chen; Jiayu Cui; Xiaoyu Zeng; Ying Li; Yuan Li; Xuqun You
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.