Literature DB >> 21440884

Temporal-range estimation of multiple objects: evidence for an early bottleneck.

Robin Baurès1, Daniel Oberfeld, Heiko Hecht.   

Abstract

When making parallel time-to-contact (TTC) estimates of two approaching objects, the two respective TTC estimates interfere with one another in an asymmetric fashion. The TTC of the later-arriving object is systematically overestimated, while the estimated TTC for the first-arriving object is as accurate as in a condition presenting only a single object. This asymmetric interference points to a processing bottleneck that could be due to early (e.g., during the estimation of the TTC from the optic flow) or late (e.g., during the timing of the response or the motor execution) constraints in the TTC estimation process. We used a Sperling-like prediction-motion task to differentiate between these two possibilities. Participants produced an absolute estimate of the TTC of only one of two objects approaching a target line. The target object to which the response was to be made was indicated by an auditory cue that occurred either at motion-onset or at the instant at which the two objects disappeared from the screen (occlusion-onset). The cue at motion-onset should disengage visual processing of the irrelevant stimulus. The cue at occlusion-onset, in contrast, requires visual processing of both relevant and irrelevant stimulus until occlusion. A single-object condition was introduced as a control condition. Results show symmetric interference in the motion-onset condition. In the occlusion-onset condition however, the results were congruent with asymmetric interference. Thus, the processing bottleneck in TTC estimation is originating at the earlier stages. 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21440884     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  8 in total

1.  Visual attention affects temporal estimation in anticipatory motor actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; Simon J Bennett; Joe Causer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of time structure on prediction motion in visual and auditory modalities.

Authors:  Kuiyuan Qin; Wenxiang Chen; Jiayu Cui; Xiaoyu Zeng; Ying Li; Yuan Li; Xuqun You
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Perceiving and acting on complex affordances: how children and adults bicycle across two lanes of opposing traffic.

Authors:  Timofey Y Grechkin; Benjamin J Chihak; James F Cremer; Joseph K Kearney; Jodie M Plumert
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  The common rate control account of prediction motion.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

6.  Depression does not affect time perception and time-to-contact estimation.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Sven Thönes; Benyne J Palayoor; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-24

7.  A catch-up illusion arising from a distance-dependent perception bias in judging relative movement.

Authors:  Tobias Meilinger; Bärbel Garsoffky; Stephan Schwan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Drift-diffusion explains response variability and capacity for tracking objects.

Authors:  Asieh Daneshi; Hamed Azarnoush; Farzad Towhidkhah; Amin Gohari; Ali Ghazizadeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.