| Literature DB >> 34719498 |
Min Chu1, Li Liu1,2, Jingjuan Wang3, Lin Liu1,4, Yu Kong1, Donglai Jing1,5, Kexin Xie1, Yue Cui1, Bo Cui1, Jing Zhang1, Hong Ye1, Junjie Li1, Lin Wang1, Pedro Rosa-Neto6, Serge Gauthier6, Liyong Wu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) seems to play an important role in behavioral deficits and executive dysfunctions in patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), while its specific and independent contribution requires clarification.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; Anterior cingulate cortex; atrophy; frontotemporal dementia; hypometabolism; magnetic resonance imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34719498 PMCID: PMC8764589 DOI: 10.3233/JAD-215127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Alzheimers Dis ISSN: 1387-2877 Impact factor: 4.472
Demographic data and neuropsychological performance in bvFTD patients (n = 21) and healthy controls (n = 21)
| bvFTD ( | Controls ( |
| |
| Age (y) | 61.00±11.32 | 57.95±8.00 | 0.320 |
| Sex (male/female) | 10/11 | 11/10 | 0.758 |
| Years of education | 10.76±4.94 | 11.62±3.14 | 0.506 |
| Disease duration (y) | 2.11±0.85 | ||
| MMSE | 17.95±5.34 | 28.73±2.09 | < 0.001 |
| FTLD-CDR sum of box | 11.67±4.90 | 0 | |
| Executive function | |||
| TMT-A | 108.07±37.47 | 48.47±17.66 | < 0.001 |
| TMT-B | 221.57±87.05 | 82.27±45.78 | < 0.001 |
| Stroop I | 85.44±53.43 | 19.13±3.14 | 0.006 |
| Stroop II | 135.00±128.30 | 29.07±5.80 | 0.004 |
| Verbal memory | |||
| RAVLT total | 14.50±10.96 | 41.20±8.52 | < 0.001 |
| RAVLT recall | 1.78±2.07 | 8.20±2.01 | < 0.001 |
| RAVLT recognition | 3.54±5.09 | 11.73±2.49 | < 0.001 |
| Visuospatial skill | |||
| Rey complex figure test | 10.71±4.51 | 15.00±1.41 | 0.004 |
| Behavioral features | |||
| FBI total score | 31.62±11.02 | 1.57±3.04 | < 0.001 |
| FBI disinhibition score | 13.57±5.62 | 0.48±0.87 | < 0.001 |
| FBI apathy score | 18.05±6.09 | 1.10±2.23 | < 0.001 |
bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; FTLD-CDR, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration-Clinical Dementia Rating scale; TMT, Trail Making Test; RAVLT, Rey’s Auditory-Verbal Learning Test; FBI, Frontal Behavior Inventory
Fig. 1GM atrophy and hypometabolism profiles. A) Regions of GM loss and B) hypometabolism in bvFTD patients. (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected, minimum cluster size 100 voxels). T values are color-coded from cyan to blue. The red arrow indicates the location of ACC.
Spatial coordinates and peak values of brain areas showing significant GM Volume and metabolism differences between bvFTD patients and healthy controls
| Region | Anatomical location | Side | Cluster Size | MNI coordinate | T value |
| GM atrophy | |||||
| Anterior cingulate | Anterior cingulum | R | 1659 | 9 45 18 | –12.14 |
| Anterior cingulum | L | 2352 | –4 35 13 | –12.30 | |
| Frontal lobe | Inferior orbital frontal | L | 2339 | –31.5 31.5 –7.5 | –9.32 |
| Medial orbital frontal | R | 1096 | 11 39 –9 | –12.17 | |
| Middle orbital frontal | R | 985 | 30 52.5 –4.5 | –9.08 | |
| Temporal lobe | Middle temporal | L | 4642 | –46.5 –6 –13.5 | –8.38 |
| Middle temporal | R | 4112 | 55 –33 –2 | –8.77 | |
| Superior temporal pole | L | 1357 | –39 15 20 | –8.27 | |
| Limbic lobe | Hippocampus | L | 1860 | –32 –12 –14 | –12.10 |
| Insula | R | 3640 | 39 6 2 | –9.07 | |
| Insula | L | 2649 | –30 –9 13.5 | –8.97 | |
| Subcortical | Caudate | L | 1492 | –12 11 10 | –8.99 |
| Putamen | R | 1139 | 28 5 3 | –9.54 | |
| GM hypometabolism | |||||
| Anterior cingulate | Anterior cingulum | L | 1135 | –4 35 13 | –9.24 |
| Anterior cingulum | R | 1040 | 2 20 26 | –11.82 | |
| Frontal lobe | Middle frontal | L | 2644 | –34 33 36 | –8.23 |
| Superior medial frontal | L | 2461 | –5 50 31 | –11.83 | |
| Superior frontal | R | 1763 | 16 70 10 | –11.11 | |
| Superior medial frontal | R | 1623 | 38 34 35 | –8.35 | |
| Temporal lobe | Superior temporal pole | L | 2252 | –39 15 –20 | –9.07 |
| Limbic lobe | Insula | R | 711 | 46 18 –10 | –8.64 |
| Subcortical | Thalamus | R | 736 | 6 –20 10 | –8.90 |
| Putamen | L | 519 | –25 4 3 | –9.26 | |
| Caudate | L | 710 | –12 11 10 | –10.43 |
MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute. All regions survived the most stringent whole-brain FWE correction for multiple comparisons at p < 0.05 (minimum cluster size 100 voxels).
Fig. 2Scatter plots of significant correlations in the bvFTD group. Strong correlations were found between SUVR of the left (A-C) and right ACC (D-F) and FBI total score, FBI disinhibition subscale score, as well as FBI apathy subscale score.
Results of the partial Pearson’s correlation analysis
| TMT-A | TMT-B | Stroop I | Stroop II | FBI Total | FBI Apathy | FBI Disinhibition | |
| GM volume | |||||||
| RACC | 0.0253 | –0.2167 | –0.5115 | –0.4185 | –0.1987 | –0.2677 | –0.0975 |
| LACC | –0.1826 | –0.4360 | –0.4648 | –0.3992 | –0.2116 | –0.3301 | –0.0542 |
| SUVR | |||||||
| RACC | 0.2330 | 0.0576 | 0.5891 | 0.6436 | –0.8546* | –0.7518* | –0.8522* |
| LACC | –0.0380 | –0.1532 | 0.5256 | 0.5704 | –0.8504* | –0.7197* | –0.8743* |
GM, gray matter; RACC, right anterior cingulum; LACC, left anterior cingulum; SUVR, standardized uptake value rate; TMT, Trail Making Test; FBI, Frontal Behavior Inventory. *of statistical significance (p < 0.05).