Literature DB >> 23447390

Flow cytometric 96-well microplate-based in vitro micronucleus assay with human TK6 cells: protocol optimization and transferability assessment.

Steven M Bryce1, Svetlana L Avlasevich, Jeffrey C Bemis, Matthew Tate, Richard M Walmsley, Frédéric Saad, Kris Van Dijck, Marlies De Boeck, Freddy Van Goethem, Magdalena Lukamowicz-Rajska, Azeddine Elhajouji, Stephen D Dertinger.   

Abstract

An automated approach for scoring in vitro micronuclei (MN) has been described in which flow cytometric analysis is combined with compound exposure, processing, and sampling in a single 96-well plate (Bryce SM et al. [2010]: Mutat Res 703:191-199). The current report describes protocol optimization and an interlaboratory assessment of the assay's transferability and reproducibility. In a training phase, the methodology was refined and collaborating laboratories were qualified by repeatedly testing three compounds. Second, a set of 32 chemicals comprised of reference genotoxicants and presumed non-genotoxicants was tested at each of four sites. TK6 cells were exposed to 10 closely spaced compound concentrations for 1.5- to 2-cell population doublings, and were then stained and lysed for flow cytometric analysis. MN frequencies were determined by evaluating ≥ 5,000 cells per replicate well, and several indices of cytotoxicity were acquired. The prevalence of positive results varied according to the MN-fold increase used to signify a genotoxic result, as well as the endpoint used to define a cytotoxicity limit. By varying these parameters, assay sensitivity and specificity values ranged from 82 to 98%, and 86 to 97%, respectively. In a third phase, one laboratory tested a further six genotoxicants and five non-genotoxic apoptosis inducers. In these experiments assay specificity was markedly improved when top concentration selection was based on two cytotoxicity endpoints-relative survival and quantification of ethidium monoazide-positive events. Collectively, the results indicate that the miniaturized assay is transferable across laboratories. The 96-well format consumes considerably less compound than conventional in vitro MN test methods, and the high information content provided by flow cytometry helps guard against irrelevant positive results arising from overt toxicity.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23447390     DOI: 10.1002/em.21760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of in vitro and in vivo clastogenic potency based on benchmark dose analysis of flow cytometric micronucleus data.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bemis; John W Wills; Steven M Bryce; Dorothea K Torous; Stephen D Dertinger; Wout Slob
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Biomarkers of DNA damage response improve in vitro micronucleus assays by revealing genotoxic mode of action and reducing the occurrence of irrelevant positive results.

Authors:  Svetlana Avlasevich; Tina Pellegrin; Manali Godse; Steven Bryce; Jeffrey Bemis; Peter Bajorski; Stephen Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Optimized automated data analysis for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using imaging flow cytometry for high throughput radiation biodosimetry.

Authors:  M A Rodrigues; C E Probst; L A Beaton-Green; R C Wilkins
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 4.  High throughput toxicity screening and intracellular detection of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins; Balasubramanyam Annangi; Laura Rubio; Ricard Marcos; Marco Dorn; Carolin Merker; Irina Estrela-Lopis; Mihaela Roxana Cimpan; Mohamed Ibrahim; Emil Cimpan; Melanie Ostermann; Alexander Sauter; Naouale El Yamani; Sergey Shaposhnikov; Sylvie Chevillard; Vincent Paget; Romain Grall; Jozo Delic; Felipe Goñi- de-Cerio; Blanca Suarez-Merino; Valérie Fessard; Kevin N Hogeveen; Lise Maria Fjellsbø; Elise Runden Pran; Tana Brzicova; Jan Topinka; Maria João Silva; P E Leite; A R Ribeiro; J M Granjeiro; Roland Grafström; Adriele Prina-Mello; Maria Dusinska
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2016-06-07

5.  Automation of the in vitro micronucleus assay using the Imagestream® imaging flow cytometer.

Authors:  Matthew A Rodrigues
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.355

6.  A novel in vitro 3D model of the human bone marrow to bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Alexander R Vernon; Roy M Pemberton; H Ruth Morse
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.954

7.  Evaluation of the automated MicroFlow® and Metafer™ platforms for high-throughput micronucleus scoring and dose response analysis in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.

Authors:  Jatin R Verma; Benjamin J Rees; Eleanor C Wilde; Catherine A Thornton; Gareth J S Jenkins; Shareen H Doak; George E Johnson
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 6.168

8.  Inter-laboratory automation of the in vitro micronucleus assay using imaging flow cytometry and deep learning.

Authors:  George E Johnson; Paul Rees; John W Wills; Jatin R Verma; Benjamin J Rees; Danielle S G Harte; Qiellor Haxhiraj; Claire M Barnes; Rachel Barnes; Matthew A Rodrigues; Minh Doan; Andrew Filby; Rachel E Hewitt; Catherine A Thornton; James G Cronin; Julia D Kenny; Ruby Buckley; Anthony M Lynch; Anne E Carpenter; Huw D Summers
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.