Sara Nofal1, Yi-Qian Nancy You2, George J Chang2, Elizabeth G Grubbs1, Brian Bednarski3. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 2. Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 3. Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: bkbednarski@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-resolution pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a critical tool in the management of patients with rectal cancer. An on-line curriculum was developed for surgical trainees on the interpretation of pelvic MRI in rectal cancer for clinical staging and surgical planning. METHODS: The online curriculum was developed using the six-step approach to curriculum development for medical education. The curriculum incorporated case-based learning, annotated videos, and narrated presentations on key aspects of pelvic MRI in rectal cancer. A pilot study was conducted to assess curriculum effectiveness among Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) fellows using pre- and post-intervention assessments. RESULTS: Of 15 eligible fellows, nine completed the pilot study (60%). The fellows' median confidence score after completing the online curriculum (40, IQR: 33-46) was significantly higher than their baseline median confidence score (23, IQR: 14-30), P = 0.0039. The total practical assessment score significantly increased from a pre-median score of 9 (IQR: 8-11) to a post-median score of 14 (IQR: 13-14), P = 0.0078. A subgroup analysis revealed a significant change in the knowledge assessment with a median score of 7 compared to a baseline median score of 4, Z = 2.64, P = 0.0078. However, the skills assessment showed no significant change. CONCLUSIONS: The case-based online curriculum had a positive impact on CGSO fellows' knowledge and confidence in the utilization of pelvic MRI for patients with rectal cancer. This unique on-line curriculum demonstrates a mechanism to enhance shared educational collaboration across CGSO fellowships and other surgical training programs.
BACKGROUND: High-resolution pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a critical tool in the management of patients with rectal cancer. An on-line curriculum was developed for surgical trainees on the interpretation of pelvic MRI in rectal cancer for clinical staging and surgical planning. METHODS: The online curriculum was developed using the six-step approach to curriculum development for medical education. The curriculum incorporated case-based learning, annotated videos, and narrated presentations on key aspects of pelvic MRI in rectal cancer. A pilot study was conducted to assess curriculum effectiveness among Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) fellows using pre- and post-intervention assessments. RESULTS: Of 15 eligible fellows, nine completed the pilot study (60%). The fellows' median confidence score after completing the online curriculum (40, IQR: 33-46) was significantly higher than their baseline median confidence score (23, IQR: 14-30), P = 0.0039. The total practical assessment score significantly increased from a pre-median score of 9 (IQR: 8-11) to a post-median score of 14 (IQR: 13-14), P = 0.0078. A subgroup analysis revealed a significant change in the knowledge assessment with a median score of 7 compared to a baseline median score of 4, Z = 2.64, P = 0.0078. However, the skills assessment showed no significant change. CONCLUSIONS: The case-based online curriculum had a positive impact on CGSO fellows' knowledge and confidence in the utilization of pelvic MRI for patients with rectal cancer. This unique on-line curriculum demonstrates a mechanism to enhance shared educational collaboration across CGSO fellowships and other surgical training programs.
Authors: Nicholas J Battersby; Peter How; Brendan Moran; Sigmar Stelzner; Nicholas P West; Graham Branagan; Joachim Strassburg; Philip Quirke; Paris Tekkis; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Mark Gudgeon; Bill Heald; Gina Brown Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Andrea Cercek; Campbell S D Roxburgh; Paul Strombom; J Joshua Smith; Larissa K F Temple; Garrett M Nash; Jose G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Rona Yaeger; Zsofia K Stadler; Kenneth Seier; Mithat Gonen; Neil H Segal; Diane L Reidy; Anna Varghese; Jinru Shia; Efsevia Vakiani; Abraham J Wu; Christopher H Crane; Marc J Gollub; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Leonard B Saltz; Martin R Weiser Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Fiona G M Taylor; Philip Quirke; Richard J Heald; Brendan J Moran; Lennart Blomqvist; Ian R Swift; David Sebag-Montefiore; Paris Tekkis; Gina Brown Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Y Nancy You; Karin M Hardiman; Andrea Bafford; Vitaliy Poylin; Todd D Francone; Kurt Davis; Ian M Paquette; Scott R Steele; Daniel L Feingold Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 4.412