Sara Nofal1, Y Nancy You1, George J Chang1, Elizabeth E Grubbs1, Brian K Bednarski2. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: bkbednarski@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer. However, baseline experience of surgical residents with MRI is unknown. Therefore, a needs assessment survey was conducted to examine confidence with pelvic MRI for residents entering Complex General Surgical Oncology (CSGO) fellowships. METHODS: A multi-institutional survey evaluated incoming CGSO fellows' experience with pelvic MRI for rectal cancer in residency. Additionally, confidence was assessed for essential components of pelvic MRI including T- and N-stage, circumferential resection margin (CRM), extramural venous invasion (EMVI), and pelvic anatomy. RESULTS: Of the twenty-four incoming fellows who completed the survey (response rate = 44%), 20 reported frequent use of pelvic MRI for rectal cancer in residency, but 16 reported rarely/never interpreting images themselves for staging or operative planning. Most respondents reported low confidence for T-stage, N-stage, CRM, EMVI, as well as pelvic anatomy, particularly for lateral and posterior pelvis. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a pelvic MRI curriculum for residents entering CGSO fellowships could enhance their clinical training in the multidisciplinary management of patients with rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer. However, baseline experience of surgical residents with MRI is unknown. Therefore, a needs assessment survey was conducted to examine confidence with pelvic MRI for residents entering Complex General Surgical Oncology (CSGO) fellowships. METHODS: A multi-institutional survey evaluated incoming CGSO fellows' experience with pelvic MRI for rectal cancer in residency. Additionally, confidence was assessed for essential components of pelvic MRI including T- and N-stage, circumferential resection margin (CRM), extramural venous invasion (EMVI), and pelvic anatomy. RESULTS: Of the twenty-four incoming fellows who completed the survey (response rate = 44%), 20 reported frequent use of pelvic MRI for rectal cancer in residency, but 16 reported rarely/never interpreting images themselves for staging or operative planning. Most respondents reported low confidence for T-stage, N-stage, CRM, EMVI, as well as pelvic anatomy, particularly for lateral and posterior pelvis. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a pelvic MRI curriculum for residents entering CGSO fellowships could enhance their clinical training in the multidisciplinary management of patients with rectal cancer.