OBJECTIVE: Involuntary subject motion is the main source of artifacts in weight-bearing cone-beam CT of the knee. To achieve image quality for clinical diagnosis, the motion needs to be compensated. We propose to use inertial measurement units (IMUs) attached to the leg for motion estimation. METHODS: We perform a simulation study using real motion recorded with an optical tracking system. Three IMU-based correction approaches are evaluated, namely rigid motion correction, non-rigid 2D projection deformation and non-rigid 3D dynamic reconstruction. We present an initialization process based on the system geometry. With an IMU noise simulation, we investigate the applicability of the proposed methods in real applications. RESULTS: All proposed IMU-based approaches correct motion at least as good as a state-of-the-art marker-based approach. The structural similarity index and the root mean squared error between motion-free and motion corrected volumes are improved by 24-35% and 78-85%, respectively, compared with the uncorrected case. The noise analysis shows that the noise levels of commercially available IMUs need to be improved by a factor of 105 which is currently only achieved by specialized hardware not robust enough for the application. CONCLUSION: Our simulation study confirms the feasibility of this novel approach and defines improvements necessary for a real application. SIGNIFICANCE: The presented work lays the foundation for IMU-based motion compensation in cone-beam CT of the knee and creates valuable insights for future developments.
OBJECTIVE: Involuntary subject motion is the main source of artifacts in weight-bearing cone-beam CT of the knee. To achieve image quality for clinical diagnosis, the motion needs to be compensated. We propose to use inertial measurement units (IMUs) attached to the leg for motion estimation. METHODS: We perform a simulation study using real motion recorded with an optical tracking system. Three IMU-based correction approaches are evaluated, namely rigid motion correction, non-rigid 2D projection deformation and non-rigid 3D dynamic reconstruction. We present an initialization process based on the system geometry. With an IMU noise simulation, we investigate the applicability of the proposed methods in real applications. RESULTS: All proposed IMU-based approaches correct motion at least as good as a state-of-the-art marker-based approach. The structural similarity index and the root mean squared error between motion-free and motion corrected volumes are improved by 24-35% and 78-85%, respectively, compared with the uncorrected case. The noise analysis shows that the noise levels of commercially available IMUs need to be improved by a factor of 105 which is currently only achieved by specialized hardware not robust enough for the application. CONCLUSION: Our simulation study confirms the feasibility of this novel approach and defines improvements necessary for a real application. SIGNIFICANCE: The presented work lays the foundation for IMU-based motion compensation in cone-beam CT of the knee and creates valuable insights for future developments.
Authors: Andreas Maier; Hannes G Hofmann; Martin Berger; Peter Fischer; Chris Schwemmer; Haibo Wu; Kerstin Müller; Joachim Hornegger; Jang-Hwan Choi; Christian Riess; Andreas Keil; Rebecca Fahrig Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Jang-Hwan Choi; Rebecca Fahrig; Andreas Keil; Thor F Besier; Saikat Pal; Emily J McWalter; Gary S Beaupré; Andreas Maier Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Andreas Maier; Hannes G Hofmann; Chris Schwemmer; Joachim Hornegger; Andreas Keil; Rebecca Fahrig Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Neil A Segal; Eric Frick; Jeffrey Duryea; Michael C Nevitt; Jingbo Niu; James C Torner; David T Felson; Donald D Anderson Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: N A Segal; E Frick; J Duryea; F Roemer; A Guermazi; M C Nevitt; J C Torner; D T Felson; D D Anderson Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: H Huang; J H Siewerdsen; W Zbijewski; C R Weiss; M Unberath; T Ehtiati; A Sisniega Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 4.174