Literature DB >> 18215013

Predicting small-molecule solvation free energies: an informal blind test for computational chemistry.

Anthony Nicholls1, David L Mobley, J Peter Guthrie, John D Chodera, Christopher I Bayly, Matthew D Cooper, Vijay S Pande.   

Abstract

Experimental data on the transfer of small molecules between vacuum and water are relatively sparse. This makes it difficult to assess whether computational methods are truly predictive of this important quantity or merely good at explaining what has been seen. To explore this, a prospective test was performed of two different methods for estimating solvation free energies: an implicit solvent approach based on the Poisson-Boltzmann equation and an explicit solvent approach using alchemical free energy calculations. For a set of 17 small molecules, root mean square errors from experiment were between 1.3 and 2.6 kcal/mol, with the explicit solvent free energy approach yielding somewhat greater accuracy but at greater computational expense. Insights from outliers and suggestions for future prospective challenges of this kind are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18215013     DOI: 10.1021/jm070549+

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  113 in total

1.  Differential geometry based solvation model II: Lagrangian formulation.

Authors:  Zhan Chen; Nathan A Baker; G W Wei
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Differential geometry based solvation model. III. Quantum formulation.

Authors:  Zhan Chen; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  The character of molecular modeling.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A very short history of structure-based design: how did we get here and where do we need to go?

Authors:  Jeff Blaney
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  The SAMPL3 blind prediction challenge: transfer energy overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  SAMPL3: blinded prediction of host-guest binding affinities, hydration free energies, and trypsin inhibitors.

Authors:  A Geoffrey Skillman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Rapid prediction of solvation free energy. 3. Application to the SAMPL2 challenge.

Authors:  Enrico O Purisima; Christopher R Corbeil; Traian Sulea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  SAMPL2 and continuum modeling.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; Stanislaw Wlodek; J Andrew Grant
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Predicting hydration free energies using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations and multiple starting conformations.

Authors:  Pavel V Klimovich; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Predictions of hydration free energies from continuum solvent with solute polarizable models: the SAMPL2 blind challenge.

Authors:  Alexandre Meunier; Jean-François Truchon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.